It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Basically, my point was, why try to discredit other sites simply because they try to make money from their content or something linked off their site, especially if they have a different opinion or call out an ATS post specifically?
It's true other sites have been discredited because they've been linked to a book or a DVD and only will those web authors have their view points acknowledged if they come to ATS and post, become part of the creating the ATS pages.
Originally posted by Valhall
P.S. I believe they have a discussion board as well. But as outlined on their own site the minimum requirement to be a member on that board is to read a minimum number of their books.
I think the minimum requirement here is to sign up with a valid email, right?
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
Originally posted by Valhall
the minimum requirement to be a member on that board is to read a minimum number of their books.
Erhmm...yeah Valhall, but.... but... that would require you first ...uhm... uh...
buy the books ?!
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
In that case, I am damn glad I have a valid email address
Originally posted by Valhall
I was not speaking of legalities concerning the atrocious behavior that has been displayed in retaliation to a simple request based on a singular legal issue, I was speaking of the ethics, or lack there of, displayed by said behavior. Also, my point was not that you need to buy their books - although I'm sure the hope is you will - but that there is a requirement over and above free access membership. And, by the way, it is my understanding that the minimum requirements are much more than just the books, but I'll leave the reader to figure that out for themselves.
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
For all we know you have a few hundred dollars of expenses each month and then make a few thousand dollars for your own personal bank account while intimidating other websites or even your own members if they don't follow what ATS says is 'ethical' in regards to commercial websites promoting conspiracy.
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Basically, my point was, why try to discredit other sites simply because they try to make money from their content or something linked off their site, especially if they have a different opinion or call out an ATS post specifically?
So why not just come out and say, this is a website for making money so the guys who run it can make a living, that's why we wan't to build ATS pages and flood search engines with them?
Why try to act like it's a charity,
The 'conspiracy' would be that ATS content is herded in a way which pumps up page numbers to increase search presence to dominate the internet world of 'conspiracy content', this can make ATS supported opinion seem like fact or the difinitive word to many people even if it's not entirely true.
If ATS is purely for making money, then herding discussion makes perfect sense, it's good business but apparently that's not a proper topic to talk about because that's not what the founders are in it for?
Or we don't want to acknowledge that because it would mean ATS isn't the beacon of integrity it portrays?
Personally, i'd feel more comfortable knowing ATS is a money making business and that's why it's run like it is rather than pretend it's a full time hobby,
Originally posted by SimonGray
Anyone with a few brain cells will know we will turn a profit once ATS TV goes onto air.
Originally posted by howmuchisthedoggy
4. TheShroudofMemphis....WTF!?!?
What happened? What bugged you to make a post like that? This is the primary reason I am posting here, I just don't get it...?
Originally posted by AgentSmith
It's just petty tactics derived from jealousy or maybe more sinister motives, like because ATS is getting too close to the truth on something.