It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The CBS caption says,
"The pope sits on the altar at Korazim. The backdrop depicts Christ with an open book that reads, 'Love your enemies, I will come soon.' "
The EU's "Parliament" Building in Strasbourg has been deliberately designed to represent the Tower of Babel, as per the famous painting by Peter Brueghel, painted in 1563. The logic behind this symbolism is the the EU is seeking to "build the house of Europe" - a task yet to be completed. The building is complete and in use, but is designed to look unfinished, and even has ringed platforms around it to represent scaffolding. When asked by a secular journalist ‘Why the Tower of Babel?’ an EU official replied, ‘What they failed to complete 3000 years ago – we in Europe will finish now.’
Eusebius' Ecclesiastical history, 3:39 records Papias' (140AD) testimony that John the apostle taught him that Jesus would literally come back in the flesh and reign for 1000 years.
Justin Martyr (165AD) was a disciple of Polycarp. Polycarp worked with John the Apostle in ministry for over 20 years. Justin states in his Dialogue chapters 32 & 110 that their would be a literal 7 year tribulation, and chapter 81 there will be a literal 1000 year reign of Christ.
Irenaeus (177AD), who also studied under Polycarp and talked with John when he was young, teaches in his 'Against Heresies' 5:25-30 a literal tribulation and 1000 year reign of Christ. He goes on to say in 5:35 that Christians who try to allegorize these things are immature Christians.
Tertullian (202AD) taught in his 'Against Marcion' 3.5 that the 1000 year reign of Christ is real.
In Eusebius' Ecclesiastical history (325AD) states in 7.25 the Gnostic Cerinthus started teaching not only is the 1000 years literal but it would be for gratifying the sensual appetites like, food, drink, sex, ect. This perverse teaching lead some early Christians to reject the book of Revelation and others to accept it but view the 1000 years as symbolic.
In Ecclesiastical history 7.24 we learn when allegorical interpretation became the normal style of interpretation Nepos, a bishop in Egypt, around 295 AD, wrote a book entitled "Refutation of the Allegorists" In which he interpreted the millennium as literal. This led some to think he was trying to revive the old teaching of Cerinthus. This caused more Christians to begin to hold to the millennium among other things as allegorical. Others began to avoid the issue all together.
Dionysius, in his "Promises," also mentions Nepos and Millennialism. ECF 6.81
Victorinus commentary on Revelation chapter 22 also mentions Cerinthus.
Eusebius (325AD) and Augustine (597AD) taught the Millennium was not literal. But remember at the council of Nicea, instead of taking the position that Jesus was homousos or heterousos, Eusebius tried to make a compromise stating Jesus was neither, which of course did not work. This shows his tendency toward avoiding the controversy. Augustan taught what would later be called Calvinism. All the first and second century fathers taught it was a Gnostic perversion to say man is not given a choice in salvation.
Originally posted by Nakash
Spam, that would be incorrect. You see, Revelations is just an indepth study of former prophecy (particularly Daniel's 70 weeks). It fill's in on what we didn't know, and fleshes out the senario a bit more. So it wasn't really written as a scared reactionary anti-Roman piece to be honest. Many would disagree with me though, but I'm a Pre-Millennialist.
Originally posted by Nakash
Above is a pagan Canaanite cultic pillar or "matstsebah", also found in excavations of the city of Hatzor, showing hands raised in praise to the sun disk, portrayed within the crescent moon.
[The dragon] is a pagan symbol with Satanic overtones.
Cybele with episcopal 'daggon-hat'...
having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
Originally posted by Nakash
No problem. Been there (my Mother is Catholic, father a lapsed protestant. Grew up as a Catholic mainly, though I read the Vedas, Quran,talmud, and so forth during my childhood).
[edit on 27-1-2006 by Nakash]
Originally posted by Nakash
I *Never* said a single word in favour of Pat Robertson.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Lately I think it's clear that the Whore of Babylon must be Islam. The antichrist was Mohammed. Revelation has been playing out for hundreds and hundreds of years, I think we've been making a mistake to think all these events would happen quickly and together in time. The false prophet is one who will come and take up the mantle of Mohammed and impose Islam on the world. Muslims use one hand to carry the Koran, which itself is the mark of the beast.
Originally posted by Nakash
There is no Eucharist in Christianity, only the Lord's supper which is a symbolic ritual with a completely different meaning than that of Catholicism's bread God of Egypt.