Future of russia defense industry?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 1-2-2006 @ 12:57 PM by Russian Boy
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by Russian Boy

You're implying the Russians are going to build a moon base, LMAO, that's almost as funny as the Nazi's building a moon base, except, the Nazi myth is more believable



You are really out of date. Here let me update you a little bit .


Russia to open moonbase mine
From: Agence France-Presse From correspondents in Moscow
January 26, 2006

Moon ... the Russians may soon be going lunar / file RUSSIA is planning to mine a rare fuel on the moon by 2020 with a permanent base and a heavy-cargo transport link, a Russian space official says.

"We are planning to build a permanent base on the moon by 2015 and by 2020 we can begin the industrial-scale delivery ... of the rare isotope Helium-3," Nikolai Sevastyanov, head of the Energia space corporation, was quoted by ITAR-TASS news agency as saying at an academic conference.
The International Space Station (ISS) would play a key role in the project and a regular transport relay to the moon would be established with the help of the planned Clipper spaceship and the Parom, a space capsule intended to tug heavy cargo containers around space, Mr Sevastyanov said.

Helium-3 is a non-radioactive isotope of helium that can be used in nuclear fusion.


Advertisement:
Rare on earth but plentiful on the moon, it is seen by some experts as an ideal fuel because it is powerful, non-polluting and generates almost no radioactive by-product. "http://i1.tinypic.com/n1cok3.jpg" alt="Image hosting by TinyPic">

www.news.com


reply posted on 3-2-2006 @ 01:18 PM by ElTiante
Demographics = Destination.

Russia has a declining population (crashing really), a lousy climate, poor living conditions, a GDP smaller than Californian and a per capita GDP (much) smaller than West Virginia. Sure Russia has lots of natural resources, but what good are they if there’s no one to make use of them or they’re just being shipped out as raw materials.

Hate America all you want, but it’s still the preferred destination for the smart and ambitious. The only way they kept smart, ambitious people in the USSR was by building a wall around it.

The following compares the US to the EU, but it will give you some idea as to how the US compares to Russia.

America will also be noticeably younger then and ethnically more varied. At the moment, its median age is roughly the same as Europe's (36 against 38). By 2050, according to Bill Frey of the Brookings Institution, a think-tank, America's median age will still be around 36, but Europe's will have risen to 53 (and China's will be 44). In the 1990s, America took in the largest number of immigrants it had ever seen in one decade: 33m people now living in the country were born outside it, and Latinos have become the largest ethnic group. “America,” says Hania Zlotnik of the United Nations Population Division, “is the world's great demographic outlier.”

Then there is the technology gap. Each year, more patents are applied for in America than in the European Union. America has almost three times as many Nobel prize-winners than the next country (Britain), and spends more on research and development than any other country. On one measure of academic performance, over 90 of the world's top 100 universities are in America.

Europe and America have also been diverging economically, though one should be cautious about that. In the seven years from 1995 to 2001, real GDP rose by 3.3% a year in America but by only 2.5% a year in the European Union. The bursting of the stockmarket bubble and the subsequent recession reversed this pattern—in 2001, GDP growth was higher in Europe than America—but the gap opened up again as the economies recovered. On current estimates and forecasts, growth in America in the three years to 2004 will average 1.3 percentage points a year more than in the 12-country euro area. Some 60% of the world's economic growth since 1995 has come from America.

These relative economic gains may be reversed. It is hard to see how the country can sustain both its huge trade and budget deficits. On the other hand, its growth in the 1990s reflected a big improvement in productivity, which rose by over 2% a year in the 1990s. The number of hours worked also rose. In 1982, Europeans and Americans put in roughly the same number of hours each year. Now, Americans work a daunting 300 hours a year more.


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 09:23 AM by prelude
well this forum is basically US western dominated forum so its quite common for Russia to get criticized but for years I havent found a single reliable answer to the 3 of my questions ....if you really believe me I dont want a debate...i want a discussion from fellow american friends for understanding each other better

1 If US is so well developed then why inspite of all those so called "successful" NASA projects the americans have to depend on "age old "Russian rockets to send their men to ISS........but at last the question remains why Russian rockets.if you are so improved ..i remember that some americans even admitted that russian rockets are more reliable than US ones ... I would like to know your honest views

2 If Russia is such a crap country as some of you think what makes you all CARE and criticize of any of the positive developments of Russian military ? shall i call it haterd, anger , greed what ? I am sure you wont care to criticize such a military development of India /China /korea with such enthuciasm ...some time i get the feeling that americans inspite of being the citizens of the most powerful country always suffer from a sense of insecurity ....please let me know your(i mean the american ) views about it ..


3
you call russia a poor economy ...while you call India and China to be rising economies .....but still basically India and China are third world countries with GDP per capita four times and two times less than that of Russia....any one who have been to the 3 countries can tell you the hell and heaven difference ....please justify yourself ........

as far as defense is concerned Russia is still regarded as the second largest defense spender of the world by most of the defense analysts after USA a few of them put Russia in third position ...irrespective of the fact of wether she is second or third as far as defense is concerned how do you justify yourselves in calling Russia a poor defense spender ?

sorry for the bad english ...its not generally used in Russia

[edit on 6-2-2006 by prelude]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Top 10 Non-Lethal Weapons
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
A Different look at the Tunguska Event
  Posted 2 days ago with 7 member flags
The Robots Of Boston Dynamics Inc.
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags
Camouflage face paint \'resists intense heat from bombs\'
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Freeze Dried Food
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags
Asia’s New Arms Race: Missiles, Missile Defenses
  Posted 15 days ago with 0 member flags