9/11: A Boeing 757 *DID NOT* Strike the Pentagon, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 26-1-2006 @ 12:46 PM by Lyte Trizzle
yes i challenge that claim.

the "damaged spool" is not a recognizable spool at all but point is even if it was it's ludicrous to assert the others were untouched

and i am going off these graphs....





furthermore........

the measurements don't add-up considering all the official claims anyway.

The Pentagon report also made note of the fact that:

"With the possible exception of the immediate vicinity of the fuselage’s entry point at column line 14, essentially all interior impact damage was inflicted in the first story: The aircraft seems for the most part to have slipped between the first-floor slab on grade and the second floor."

That is impossible as the following graphic will show. Note the pink line, where the "13 ft cylinder" is supposed to have slipped "under."



reply posted on 26-1-2006 @ 01:06 PM by ChapaevII
Originally posted by Lyte Trizzle
That is impossible as the following graphic will show. Note the pink line, where the "13 ft cylinder" is supposed to have slipped "under."


I am just amazed at this. Are you telling me that someone has to fly a plane that close to the ground and exactly parallel to get into that tiny hole? Who flew that plane anyway? That is some great flying.

I saw stuff like that when they were sending the bombs into Baghdad! Remember, they had those RealTV cameras on the front so you could see them go down the chimney. Like Santa Clause but with a bang!

Hey! Maybe it was one of those things! They really move around great, and they can go right through things! Hey, that might be why that round punched out hole in the end of that thing happened?

Wow! What if it was one of those drone missles? Wouldnt that get inside? And maybe that military guy who reported the helicopter just before the fireball was painting the target for the delivery vehicle?

That would certainly fit the picture better than a huge jet flying 3 feet over the ground. Man Tom Cruise would have to be flying that in a movie to happen like that.



reply posted on 26-1-2006 @ 01:34 PM by Zaphod58

The image in impact is much brighter than any of the other 4 images. The brightness is higher throughout the image, not just in regions that would be illuminated by the bright explosion. There is no evidence of shadows from the explosion that is supposedly the source of the heightened brightness. Note the setback in the facade in the middle of the images to the right. The setback is considerably closer than the explosion, yet it casts no shadow on the portion of the facade just in front of it. There is also an absence of any evidence of even faint shadows from other objects, such as the structures in the vicinity of the camera. The sky is also brighter and a different hue, as if an explosion could brighten a clear sky.



The last three frames show an explosion with a shape that is roughly axially symmetric around a vertical axis. The center of the impact zone lies approximately behind the center of the helicopter control tower. That places the central axis of the explosion well inside of the building -- easily 100 feet behind the facade. But the part of the building above the impact hole did not collapse until well after the impact and explosion. How could an explosion evolve in such a symmetrical manner around the obstacle of the building without reflecting the shape of the building? The only plausible explanation is that the explosion imagery was superimposed on the building through image manipulation.



By the last of the five frames, the explosion, which appears to extend to at least four times the building's height, has become dark with soot. Yet the huge explosion casts no shadow from the sun on the lawn below it. Shadows of other objects show that the sun is low in the southeast, as one would expect at 9:40 AM in September. The Pentagon's wall, which faces almost due west, casts long shadows extending to the left and toward the camera. But there is sunlight-illuminated lawn directly left of the huge explosion. The uppermost swath of white in the enlargement to the right is part of the heliport, which was directly under portions of the explosion. Yet it is illuminated by direct sunlight.

911research.wtc7.net...

This is the best analysis of the video I've been able to find so far.


reply posted on 26-1-2006 @ 03:16 PM by Lyte Trizzle
since of course they are withholding other videos of the impact AND the existence of this video was flat out denied until just after the release of Thierry Meyssan book, L'effroyable Imposture (The frightening Fraud), explaining his theory that the damage to the Pentagon resulted from a truck bomb rather than a plane crash; there is no reason to accept the validitiy of this video.

NOBODY AT THE PENTAGON WILL EVEN CLAIM RESPONSIBILITY FOR RELEASING IT!

Evidence the Images Were Edited

Motive for Fabrication:

The clear evidence that the video frames were manipulated further discredits the idea that the release of these images was just a miscalculation on the part of people involved in the cover-up. The source of these images must have known that they show a vapor trail, an obscured aircraft that is clearly not a 757, and an explosion that could not have resulted from jet fuel combustion alone. It is unreasonable to think that this set of five frames is anything other than a planned part of the cover-up. They fueled theories that the Pentagon crash involved a small plane and a missile, rather than a jetliner such as Flight 77. The perpetrators have correctly predicted that controversy between people rejecting and insisting that Flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon would divide skeptics.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 13 hours ago, 106 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 68 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies