I didn't speak to Buzz about 9/11, I spoke to him about the Apollo missions, space travel and alien life funnily enough
I think Royal scandles were mentioned by Mrs Aldrin at one point, 9/11 was mentioned but only in context of conversation.....
No, I don't expect you to take my word for it, but there are plenty of people here that do
know I'm telling the truth and know the sort of
people I mix with, so it's more for their benefit.
Sorry how many people involved in aerospace do you know personally again? I missed your reply?
Sorry if my unimpressive name dropping hit a nerve, but I guess it smarts when you think you're clever doing it with your internet source copied off
a website and it turns out that other people actually do
get to speak
with far more interesting, real life, individuals.
I guess it's threatening to someone in your position when you build up a carefully crafted set of arguments (sorry in your case copy a carefully
crafted set of arguments) based on disinformation and mis-quotes, only to have people come along who either know what they are talking about first
hand or actually know people, directly, that do. Your information isn't from the horse's mouth so to speak, it's more like chinese whispers. It's
so twisted out of context by the time it's presented it probably bares little resemblance to whatever was meant in the first place.
With the exception of statements lke the one made by your ex Air-Force
officer of course
I loved the way for instance, that other forum was good evidence for the conspiracy, until the deception employed by the original poster is pointed
out and that it's actually in favour of there being a 757, then suddenly it's disregarded!
What a surprise...
I also like the way that the various people involved in aerospace I know are 'ZERO' sources, but I guess that's because it's not 10th hand
information seemingly backing up your claims?
Son, you have to remember that not everyone on here is like you, there are a lot of people here that either have relevant jobs, hold positions of
great responsibility, often come into contact with some pretty high up and well educated people, or any combination of the above. Now you can either
learn from these people and their experiences that they share, or you can carry on spouting off like you think you know what you're talking about
because you read everything off some website.
I think that's the best bit of all of this, you seem to rely 100% on what you read on Conspiracy sites and have no background off the computer as an
additional source of information, yet you criticise those that do? How does that work? How are your dubious internet sources more reliable than
face-to-face conversations with those directly involved in the industry?
You probably wonder why I and others are hostile towards you and your mate, but the problem is that when you strode on into ATS with your head the
size of a planet, giving the attitude and laying down the law like you're the biggest authority on 9/11 and the science behind it, what you failed to
realise is that there are a lot of people here who either have a great deal of first hand knowledge or know people personally, in real life, that
know what they are talking about.
So excuse me if you don't like my attitude and certain other people's, but maybe you should cast your mind back to when you arrived with your chum
and the behaviour we have all learned to associate with you, then maybe ask yourself why you get the response you do. Don't be too disappointed
either when people put you back in your place.
So now we've finished comparing willies, if it's all the same to you and with your kind permission, perhaps we can get back to the topic?
I'd be interested in why you think it's impossible that your source is a dis-info seed? Seeing as his ex-military and we were warned of it? How's
that impossible again?
That's your lone source in a minority out of the huge majority of qualified people that don't
have a problem with it of course?
Does it not strike you odd that out of the thousands of qualified people they arn't getting up in arms about it? Does it not strike you odd that you
have to search pretty hard to find the odd one that does have a problem with what happened? Or are you saying that the majority are incompetent?
Actually, don't bother. Speaking to you is nothing more than a combined amusement and embarrasment that leaves a nasty taste in the mouth. I waste
far too much time arguing with people like you for the sake of it and I've been trying to do something about it, though I seem to have lapsed into it
the last few days which has left me once again with the feeling of communicating with the inhabitants of a kindergarten.
You are free to have your last word, as I'm sure you feel obliged to do
I'm going to be busy having a more intellectual conversation with my wall, while I watch the paint dry.
[edit on 16-3-2006 by AgentSmith]