It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Look at the stuff they sell on that website. What kind of people would buy that crap? The rense.com audience, that’s who! That website and most everything that comes from it is complete bull plop.
EDIT: Not to mention all the racist propaganda on that site. It might as well be stormfront.com.
[edit on 24-1-2006 by Dronetek]
Originally posted by LetKnowledgeDrop
He has come out now saying that the ''war on terrorism'' is a hoax, and is being used to create a world government body.
I personally believe that this is the case, I have been saying that ever since it happened.
Originally posted by SwearBear
If some of you don't like infowars.com or rense.com, you can also find the article on Google News.
news.google.com...
Originally posted by Dronetek
Originally posted by SwearBear
If some of you don't like infowars.com or rense.com, you can also find the article on Google News.
news.google.com...
that isnt google news. Its just a search done from google.
Originally posted by SwearBear
If some of you don't like infowars.com or rense.com, you can also find the article on Google News.
news.google.com...
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by SwearBear
If some of you don't like infowars.com or rense.com, you can also find the article on Google News.
news.google.com...
Thats a link to searches for news article mentioning his name. There are no reputable news sources reporting this. That is probably because the article is a fraud and he didn't write it.
Center for Defense Information (interview)
Question: How broadly shall we interpret the Brussels accord on Russian-NATO close cooperation in the war on international terrorism?
Leonid Ivashov: I dislike the term, you know. As I see it, combating international terrorism in Afghanistan is only a secondary mission as far as the Americans are concerned. Demonstration of its military might is what the United States is really after. I even think that there is more to objectives of the operation that the war on terrorism as such. In other words, the counter-terrorism operation in Afghanistan may be viewed as a means of crushing the Taliban and, more importantly, establishing American hegemony in this part of the world. The Americans themselves do not deny it, by the way, referring to their strategy of national security ...
swearbear
What is a "reputable" source?
Originally posted by SwearBear
Originally posted by Dronetek
Originally posted by SwearBear
If some of you don't like infowars.com or rense.com, you can also find the article on Google News.
news.google.com...
that isnt google news. Its just a search done from google.
Yes it is. Google doesn't report it's own news, dumbass.
I dislike the term, you know. As I see it, combating international terrorism in Afghanistan is only a secondary mission as far as the Americans are concerned. Demonstration of its military might is what the United States is really after. I even think that there is more to objectives of the operation that the war on terrorism as such. In other words, the counter-terrorism operation in Afghanistan may be viewed as a means of crushing the Taliban and, more importantly, establishing American hegemony in this part of the world. The Americans themselves do not deny it, by the way, referring to their strategy of national security ...
Originally posted by Nygdan
A source that at verifies its articles and information. Rense.com doesn't do
that
...
info wars does the same sort of thing.
As far as aljazeera, which is one of the other hits in that google search, there are two al-jazeera websites, one is from the news network, another is infact quite mysterious.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Here, he says he "dislikes" the term. He never said there wasnt international terrorists. Unless you can point out to me where he does say that, ill have to call this another spin operation by the usual suspects. The fact that this general probobly has to deal with international terrorists on a daily basis dosnt help the "no terrorists" argument either.
Originally posted by LetKnowledgeDrop
And like you ever do, moron. You give NO proof at all. YOU just blindly believe your controlled media. Sheep.....
[edit on 25-1-2006 by LetKnowledgeDrop]