It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sardion2000
If you want people to actually take you seriously for a change stop talking down to them.
Whenever I see someone disagree with you, you go and say something like the above quote.
You said that University textbooks are misinformed remember that? No that wasn't it you said...
Now you say go argue with people who have degrees who had to be misinformed from those same textbooks in order to get said degree. WHICH IS IT!?!?! You're contradicting yourself.
Originally posted by bigpappadiaz
I'll take this one on dude, some people need explaining.
The point he was trying to drill through your head is that people like you only tend to believe those with degrees, he's not going to waste his brain space learning a big fat book's worth of crap and clutter wrote by a bunch of people who admit they don't really understand how "it all" works so how do we know learning the teachings and techniques in it will give us the right thought processes we need to understand the universe, and finally, go ahead and argue with someone like that because you'd obviously find it much more fascinating although not necessarily elightening.
There are points in learning when breakthrough discoveries are made and we supposedly can't predict what the future will be like because we don't know how we'll build ourselves around these discoveries. Being stuck in one mindset won't help you "break on through to the other side."
Originally posted by DeepCoverUK
If light cannot escape a black hole, does that mean that the photons are being accelerated to a speed greater than the speed of light towards the centre of the black hole? If this is possible, does it also mean that all other mass that is 'sucked' into a black hole is also being accelerated to a speed greater than the speed of light?
Also, what governs the intenstiy of a light? The light from the sun can be seen very far away, but the light from a dim bulb does not travel very far. Is this related directly to the energy given to the photons when they are released? - and how?
Originally posted by T_Jesus
Hmm...maybe I misread something, but someone seemed to imply that because photons have momentum they have mass. Just because something has momentum, does not mean it has mass.
Originally posted by sardion2000
Newton also says that light isn't a constant, gravity propogates instantly and time is constant and not relative. We all know how that turned out
[edit on 24-1-2006 by sardion2000]
[edit on 24-1-2006 by sardion2000]
Originally posted by sardion2000
math.ucr.edu...
The short answer is "no", but it is a qualified "no" because there are odd ways of interpreting the question which could justify the answer "yes".
But you can say that the photon has relativistic mass if you really want to. In modern terminology the mass of an object is its invariant mass which is zero for a photon.
Posted by Intelearthling
I can't find it right now, but several years ago, I was reading an article on light and it said that sunlight was pressing against the Earth's surface at a rate of about 6 lbs./mi.^2. The total weight against the entire Earth's surface is equal to about the weight of a modern luxury liner.
Posted by Sardion2000
Newton also says that light isn't a constant, gravity propogates instantly and time is constant and not relative....
Originally posted by Yarium
Well that's the question isn't it...
In theory, this could be achieved though the Graviton - but only mass seems to emit gravitons (IF this is indeed the case). Until we a) discover the graviton/gravity "carrying" particle/energy and b) discover how to manipulate it and create it, then we cannot affect this "fabric".
In other words, might it be possible to cause curvature of space-time in the absence of sufficient mass? If space-time is indeed a curved "fabric" (at least conceptually when we visualize it), and light can be effected by its curvature despite lacking mass (some say it has mass at C, but that would necessitate that it has extremely small mass at rest - which you'd all know better than I lol), then would it not be conceivable that we could 'grab' this 'fabric' and bend it through some means other than mass?