It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
002.216
YUSUFALI: Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.
PICKTHAL: Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that ye hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that ye love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, ye know not.
SHAKIR: Fighting is enjoined on you, and it is an object of dislike to you; and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you, and Allah knows, while you do not know.
"Allah has purchased from the faithful their lives and worldly goods, and in return has promised them the Garden. They will fight for the cause of Allah, they will slay, and be slain."
Originally posted by Ghaele
> The Hadith says that the trees will call out to the Muslims “there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him”.
If the Koran is to blame, why then do they use the Hadith? The Hadith is not the Koran. The Hadith is extremley rasistic and that is why extremists use the Hadith (Maybe they think it is a translation of Koran? It is not).
Value of hadith compared to the value of the Qur'an
Muslims who accept hadith believe that trusted hadith are in most cases the words of Muhammad and not the word of God, like the Qur'an. Hadith Qudsi form a partial exception; this small minority of hadith purports to express words spoken by God to Muhammad but not included in the Qur'an, or the sense of them.
While both hadith and Qur'an have been translated, most Muslims believe that translations of the Qur'an are inherently deficient, amounting to little more than a commentary upon the text. There is no such belief regarding hadith. Practicing Muslims cleanse themselves (wudu) and pray before reading or reciting the Qur'an; there is no such requirement for reading or reciting hadith. Even for Muslims who accept the hadith, they are clearly of inferior rank.
Just because a certain passage of the bible or the koran says to do this or kill that does not make it right, especially when directed on one faith as is the case here
How on earth anyone can even consider that as a way to defend their actions is beyond me
Originally posted by Hellmutt
But I just wonder, is he excused because what he said is written in Islam’s holy book?
Hasn't the President of the United States used such statements from the Bible and God's will to justify his current mission of killing in Iraq?
good excuse to brush up on the Qur'an
Originally posted by FLYIN HIGH
I just simply cannot bring myself to believe this. There must be something very wrong because I thought that the Muslim's Holy Book was one that was steeped in Peace Speaking for myself, I do not trust a dA=n one of 'em.
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
Why would you think that? Have you ever read the Qur'an? If you had, you would know that it is not "steeped in peace". In fact, it is repleat with intolerant language against anything that isn't a part of Islam. It is anti semetic, anti-Christian, anti-non-believers, and anti-women. This topic has been covered ad-nauseum.
Originally posted by spamandham
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
Why would you think that? Have you ever read the Qur'an? If you had, you would know that it is not "steeped in peace". In fact, it is repleat with intolerant language against anything that isn't a part of Islam. It is anti semetic, anti-Christian, anti-non-believers, and anti-women. This topic has been covered ad-nauseum.
It does seem ironic that the anti-everything-but-jew old testament gave rise to the anti-everything-but-christian new testament that gave rise to the anti-everything-but-muslim-quran. Numerous other anti-everything-but-us spin offs abound as well.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
I suspect that whether the Hadith, or any other book, is "holy" is a moot point in court, and just the only defence his lawyer could come up with. I could hardly use the Old Testament as an excuse as to why I went and smited my neighbour's wife for looking at my ox in a funny way.
The guy has either broken a law or he hasn't, whatever it says in an ancient book is irrelevant. Jews are covered by race hate laws in the UK, so if he has tried to stir up hatred of them he will be guilty of "incitement to racial hatred". If he has tried to influence others to commit violence (against anyone) then he could be guilty of a number of offences including "conspiricy to commit violence" or "conspiricy to murder" or a number of public order offences.
This defence, taken to it's extreme, would mean I could convert to Islam, attack some Jewish guy with an axe, and then when the police arrived wave the Qur'an at them going "It's OK mate, nothing to worry about, it's all in here". It will be interesting to see what the Judge and the prosecution have to say about it.
Having said this, Abu Hamza is a moron with spittle in his beard, it's only the tabloids over here who have built him up to be some kind of dangerous religious warrior.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
So .. now that I'm highly offended and that half the population
of the planet is offended, I feel it is time for all of us females,
and our sympathizers, to riot, destroy private property, loot,
pillage, burn, and call for mass murder in order to have our
demands met ... namely that all Qurans everywhere be
destroyed immediately.