It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Produkt
Granted all matter is composed of this underlying vibrational form of energy, atoms themselve's are still widely seperated from one another. The only connection shared is the same basic building blocks. If I die, my atomic structure, molecular structure breaks down and is used as an energy source for a plant, I'm not truely connected to that planet. That atome or molecule the plant made use of has no life in itself. I cease to exist when I die. I stop producing/using the energy needed to continue to function. My part's break down naturally over time. So yes, we do really die. The sense of us ceases to exist, that chemical/electro-chemical process ceases to function. The only thing that is transfered is the now inert molecule's and atom's.
At it's current state of evolution, the human species will never live in a perfect world of love and peace and wholesome goodness. We are still driven by our animal instict's. Until something come's along, turning off those gene's that produce these instinct's, nothing will change. Love is an emotional response, yes, one possibly evolved from a mating response that we still possess. Love could be taken to be many different factor's of emotional/intictual responses/chemical reactions. I'm no knocking the idea of love, I still feel the emotion, but I won't kid myself.
Quite wrong, we do understand the negative impact's of nuclear energy, which is why we've developed and continually develope protective measure's against's those negative impacts. This isn't due to a lack nor full understanding of ourselve's, this is due to a full understanding of the process of nuclear energy. it's also thanks to the understanding of the destructive qualities of nuclear energy that we developed the nuclear bomb, again, not because we understood or failed to understand ourselve's.
While I can't fully answer that question of why money would make us happy, I could hazzard a very educated guess. You can train a dog to salivate at the sound of a bell, it's a reward system of sort's. He hear's the bell and learn's it mean's food. Over time, take away the food, the dog will still salivate. Why? Because instinct tell's the dog bell equals food and thus salivate's in resonse to that. Money didn't alway's exist, before money we traded and bartered, this system, over time evolved into money. Gold and silver, shiny. Many animal's LOVE shiny. Human's LOVE shiny. This was our favorite, and even today, still favorite shiny. Why do we and animal's like shiny? I don't know, but shiny is the true god! Anyway's, back on topic... Money is that same reward system. Money equals goods and services that were back in ancient time's bartered for. We're still feeling that instinct or act of bartering when we exchange money. Just as if you had more to barter with, you got more in return for what you wanted/needed. Same with money of today, the more you have the more you get. Personally I also don't see a reason for money, or even bartering. There's enough space and resources for todays population to live equally, IF we applied ourselve's to achieve that goal, but other instincts come into play destroying the chance's for that happening.
Peace is the goal because it is being able to live. You go tell a lion that or a shark. There are no actual goal's to life beyond reproducing and surviving. The reason we live in a world of conflict is thanks to our natural instict's. We're still territorial creature's. There's no shame in that. We have materialism because we are material being's. We cloth ourselve's for very good reason's. We house ourselve's for very good reason's. We procure territory, etc. We are materialistic by our very nature.
The reason we say we're living is due to our self awareness. We are a set of self aware complex chemical reactions capable of reproducing those genetic traits that create more of the same series of complex chemical reactions. A rock, by our definition isn't living because it doesn't do the same. A rock isn't self aware that it is a rock. We on the other hand are self aware that we are self aware. When technology permit's AI to advance to self awareness and allows it to produce more of it's kind, even without producing more of it's kind, I will fully accept that set of complex programming intruction's as being alive. Wholly different from our chemical/electro-chemical computer's we call a brain, but still alive.
Can you overide any of your insticts? Which one's are you able to overide. There's a certain level of control we have over some of the basic instict's thanks to our self awareness, but despite all that, strong emotion's will make thing's a whole lot more difficult as for being able to overide your instinct's.
If I knew how life arose for a fact, what processes were involved, it still wouldn't change my outlook of life. It wouldn't change any of my goal's. My natural goal's aren't to do as I desire. By that definition who are we to condemn someone for having the desire and acting upon it to rape someone. There is nothing that will effect my reason for being. I'm fully aware and capable of understanding how it is that we're here. I'm not scared of that fact. I don't quiver in fear and despair just because I learned we're nothing more then a complex chemical machine. If I were able to learn all the why's and how's, I would simply continue to do what it is I'm doing right now, discussing them, procreating, eating, taking breaks to pee and crap. Etc. Nothing would change who I am or "why" I am. As I've said numerous time's, life isn't a divine occurance, there is now WHY, just the HOW. How did the natural process occur that lead to life. There's no reason why it happened, why would imply an unatural reason or a planned reason. All it is, is HOW. How did those first molecular protiens form together to produce what we define as life.
that the whole thing you not getting there is no ending, you existed before you started "living" just because your experience started doesnt mean you didnt exist before you were born. but if you refuse to see that everything is made at the root of one thing, energy, then idk what to tell you. yes atoms are different, in physical form they take different forms yet are still energy. you are part of that plant, and you are made from the same building blocks as that planet, you are connected. energy cannot be created or destroyed, nor matter. there is never less or more matter. that means we arent individuals, merely different forms of matter and energy.
that something is yourself, its on you to turn those genes off, it is possible. if you dont believe it though then well, whatever you believe cant happen, probably wont. or at least has alot less chances.
i can see you do not understand at all. there is no point to argue this with you. theres more effects that are undesirable and will harm us, yet we continue to use it. we use nuclear weapons, pointless weapons. we have no understanding of whats worth doing, just how to do it. science is a tool, and like all tools, can be abused severely. if you truely believe that the nuclear bomb and nuclear power are positive then i guess your not doing much thinking at all...even einstien saw this mistake coming.
nothing really to argue here, human ignorance on the masses part at its finest. and no as its stands there no way we could live isolationists, not because of wars, because population there just isnt enough space.
the primitive way of the strong survive, well no wonder this society cant progress. now war yes some will survive, and one day strong will come and end them. peace lefts all live life, not just the selective few. but this only means something if you believe we are connected in the sense hurting others is just attacking yourself. energy source for us, well science has done wonders, imagin food that came from non living things. NO MORE PRIONS EITHER!!! lol
my point being: you consider yourself alive, so what? that doesnt mean anything really other then you show specific characteristics. doesnt mean you and the rock arent the same. the energy and matter that has made you up, probably is pieces of rock, people, food, ect. you are not individual you are a contemplation of materials and energy that has taken but another form. thats all you are physically, no different then any other animal. mentally though yes you are because you can think. still doesnt mean anything as far as the connection physically. mentally, its a different type of connection you make, but i wont bother explaining it again.
you ever seen a deer jump in the way of a car to try and save its young or friend? no, as we advance these instincts become useless because we think. self preservation is an instinct, and yes thats something you can override if you believe in the cause. difficult is whatever you make it. you can control your emotions when you identify what they will be. if you dont have control over your emotions and instincts then you really arent that far along. your also probably dangerous because anger is another emotion. so yes i believe that you already have some control over your emotions and instincts. eventually we will have complete or total control.
so my question is why waste your short experience asking why when it makes no difference to you?
physical sex wouldnt have nearly as much emphasis, because its nothing more then a chemical reaction like you said. except they get nothing out of this chemical reaction unless they want to reproduce.
there is why, you just dont see it. the "why did i do that?" when you answer "a chemical reaction" what do we do just go O and walk away, let it happen again. im more interested in progressing as a race instead of just being intellecual screw ups till we destroy ourselves. you did it because those chemicals made you angry, and when you got angry you didnt think and acted on it. next time you refrain from doing the same thing because you keep thinking, using your brain instead of your instincts. and i KNOW this because its kept me from being kicked out of school and my home, so yea i can say we are capable of what we believe we are capable of.
Originally posted by Produkt
Where are you getting this whole good and evil predate blah blah idea from? The force's behind a cause and effect event are driven by many thing's. Natural occurance's. Evil doesn't make a storm appear. Good doesn't make a rainbow appear. Those are cause and effect event's. Evil doesn't make a man kill another man. That way of thinking is just calling out a scape goat to blame the cause and effect event that the man brought about. Evil doesn't force a man to pick up a gun, point it at someone and pull the trigger. His emotional response's do. A chemical imbalance inside his brain tha trigger's a strong killing instinct from way back when we were still killing each other out of aggression, territory, and pecking order. A kind of alpha male complex. A natural human response. Not an evil force.
What are the force/energy(s) that designed (caused) storms, rainbows, emotions, chemical imbalances, strong killing instincts, aggression,territorial disputes, pecking orders,alpha male complexes, 'natural' human responses to exist in the first place, thus allowing the effects such as a man picking up a gun, pointing it at someone and pulling the trigger.
Nature and good and/or evil are not mutually exclusive.
Nature is not exempt from the very real war between good and evil. Nature is a product of it, and all things in nature are subject to the ongoing influence and manipulation by these two energies.
Originally posted by Produkt
I understand where your comming from now, but in that light it's more of a religous view akin to a soul. The reality of it is however, yes a certain atom or molecular structure existed prior to me, that eventually lead to my existence doesn't inherently mean I've always existed and will forever exist. And it's untrue that matter cannot be created. There have been experiment's done where matter has been created from light. I'll look up the website tomorrow for you, this'll be my last post for the night. Anyways, I exist as a living, thinking being, not because the atom's that make me always existed. I exist as a living thinking being because those atom's became part of a complex natural process that lead to the chemical processes that lead to my ability to be self aware. If all the atoms that comprise my body became a rock, or air, or any other non living product, I wouldn't exist. The thought's in our head's are electrochemical in nature. A biological computer.
Yes, possible, but not by sheer will power alone. There are natural occurance's that would facilitate the need for those genes to turn off.
I don't see nuclear weapon's as positive. Nuclear power however, I do. As do many other's and, again, thanks to our understanding of nuclear energy and it's negative qualities we are able to develope technologies against that.
I never stated living as isiolationists. There is enough space through technological mean's for housing and agriculture to provide shelter and food for every human. There's enough resource's to provide everything need for our survival. But as you said, it's human ignorance.
Sadly, thats how it is. Society is still primitive. Still driven by it's instictual and emotional responses. We aren't any better then other species of animals on this planet. Some may be able to say, hey look, if we just stop fighting, blah blah blah, other's will look at you as weak. Easy. Childish. Other's would take that and advance upon your territory and knonk you down. While at the same time, those seeking peace would look at other's as barbaric and primitive. This leads to conflict, and those waging the wars are the ones who prevail in conflict's. A rabbit doesn't sit there praying for a peacfull existance to stop the lion from eating it. The rabbit run's like a mofo.
Maybe I'm not understanding this, but I also think your not adequatly explaining it. From your description's, it sound's like a religous view.
Is a deer as self aware as a human? Self preservation still exist's within human's. Some do overide that instinct, but so do some other species of animals, such as ape's. Maybe eventually one day we, as a species will have total control over our emotions and instinct's, but that day isn't going to be within our lifetime's nor our childrens.
I'm not asking why, I'm asking how. Me, along with countless other's are continually asking how certain thing's work to furthur progress our knowledge and the knowledge for the benefit of our offspring. Why do we do this, I'm not sure, I haven't learned of the evolutionary aspect that lead us to strive for knwoledge and understanding.
I don't see any end in physical sex. Not only does it serve the purpose of reproduction, but it's also very pleasurable. Yes, chemically induced pleasure within our brain's, but the knowledge of that isn't going to stop anyone from continuing to do it.
While I do strongly believe alot of our action's are brought about by chemicaly induced and enviromentally induced reaction's, I still don't write those action's off as acceptable. The self awareness we as a species have, should ideally stop us from acting upon socially viewed negative actions. I don't see this happening anytime soon for anyone though. It won't happen untill society as a whole can accept a more symbiotic realtionship with one another. In some way's, an NWO of sort's. We all strive towards one goal, that being the continuance of all people. Too bad we're not fully evolved enough yet for this.
physically yes you have always existed, mentally, no. we take many different forms through the course of time, as in time i mean millions of years. everything physically that makes up you, has been around before "you" you arent an individual physically, you just pieces of matter put together in another form.
no you cant either unless youve tried it, i dont mean near death or dead for a minute...i mean a full out brain gone body gone dead.
repetitive power to no longer need these DNA will though. like tails, we learned to go without, but they didnt fall off. they were still there for many years even though we didnt need them. we still even have the tailbone, yet we have no need for it, it is there. much like the tail, DNA overtime if we continue to override it and such it will become useless and start to physically turn off.
tell me what science has done to get rid of nuclear waste from energy? my point is that we didnt think it through and we ARE going to pay for it because our rash minds failed to see the outcomes.
at this point, i dont think physically there is enough room for everyone to live. death is part of nature, we dont except this, but eventualy it will still prevail. it will just end many lives at once instead of little at a time. if we didnt produce like rabbits, the people who were living could live better. genetic modification of foods and stuff like that is another thing we havent thought through. we do whatever to survive and get the immediate best outcome because we dont think ahead. we cant make clear judgements on what lies ahead because of our way of thinking. if we dicover ourselves and our way of thinking then we can change it. once we change it we can make more rational decisions. by the way, food wise is going to end up hurting ALOT if not ALL people because we believe we can supply everyone with food. even then it will eventually not be able to supply the demand and people will die that way as well.
society is primitive, agreed. wanting peace is one thing, defense is another. when i say peace i mean talk it out. when they start to charge with a knife, kill them if you have to. try not to kill them, do everything you can to stop them, like the police SHOULD be doing, but if something happens and the other person dies, o well. until everyone finds peace, theres no shame in using violence as a last resort, try not to kill or perminately damage but if you do, then o well. well the rabbit cant think nor the lion, like we can. but if they could the rabbit would try peace, but once the lion came running to eat it, it would do whatever means to evade it or kill it...of course a rabbit almost definately couldnt unless it tricked it to running off a ledge.
no its simply what it is, you are not an individual physically. mentally yes but physically no. your identity lies within your mind. you can connect mentally through understanding but mentally is your own real individual sense. what you may see LOOKS different, but in sense is all the same thing.
apes are also more advanced then most animals, our closest relative mind you. well optimism is the best mental tool you can posses so i strive to make it come within my lifetime or at least as soon as possible instead of giving up saying "maybe next generation"
hey dont see the actual negative things coming from it though because they are acting again on instinct. which they can override when they see that reproducing offspring in large amounts is no longer required because we have evolved enough to no longer have preditors. instinct tells us to mate like crazy because most of our young wont make it, we will be killed of by viruses and such. because of evolution physically and mentally, we have overcome this. we need to change our instinct because now its hurting us in many ways.
if you dont find peace as an individual how do you ever expect to find peace as a group, or even more the human race. its just not possible because we have yet to even deal with ourselves. we need to find peace in ourselves, which is what ive been saying all along.
A. we see both good and bad outcomes which we dont or nuclear energy would not have been explored past the first stage
B. that the phsycial you isnt even considered you, but thats the only reason a mental you exists, so that doesnt make sense how you could deny that there is a physical you.
C. you can state for a fact you know what happens after death.
you know nothing but yourselve, and until you grasp that there is no reason for this conversation to go on because the other concepts include that. you dont know you just found one way that may work.
you dont know physics because any variable can occur to effect them at any time. the next einstien could come along and blow away everything up to now, with totally new physics. since our physics isnt flawless nothing physical is known. just because you found a way to do something doesnt mean that its the best way. or general relativity where everything on a large scale works, but we find eventually that this doesnt apply to quantum things. sure general relativity will always have the same results on the large scale, because for the large scale it works. yet we cant call it science since it doesnt apply to ALL things. it doesnt apply to the entire universe and everything in it. until we find the theory that solves it all and it all works flawlessly, we cant even claim to know anything on the physical level.
mentally ive already told you where you need to be to start understanding things. your belief that we must ALL reach this evolving point at once shows me your little understanding of how things work mentally. so ill leave you with that to think about.
id also like to say that your idea that we should be like parasites instead of evolving makes me sick to an extent. if you take the chemical part out of the equation, there is no reason to mate more then after 1 or maybe 2 children. i showed you why its no longer reasonable on a natural level, and thats leveling with you. one last thing. peace isnt letting some one kill you, its being able to not use violence unless theres no other choice. a peaceful civilization many thousands of year more advanced then some other civilization wont war with them and will willing try to help them advance without reasons behind it. they will do everything they can to help them, even if this race is primitive. but should the race start attacking them, they wont kill them, just take their weapons away and show them why they are wrong. should they have no other option they will try to subdue them every way they can to not lead to death. if there is any chance to spair them they will.
Originally posted by Produkt
I'm not sure what boat your sailing on, BUT, before we developed the first nuclear plant, we knew PRIOR to that about radiation. We already knew and fully understood it's effect's. It's because of that understanding that we developed a way for human's to work near and in the plant without being killed from an overdose of that radiation. Our way of handling nuclear waste, burying it deep underground where it has little if any affect upon anyone, also considering the location of these site's are very remote from any human habitat. BECAUSE of our understanding that this waste is still harmfull we are currently researching more efficient ways of dealing with that waste.
While I'm alive, yes there is a physical me. After I'm gone, my body is decomposed, it's material made use from something else, that "physical" me is gone. The physical SHAPE of me no longer exist's. The MENTALITY of me no longer exists. So how is it that "I" continue to exist forever?
And you can thank scientist's for that. The mystery of death isn't a mystery. Let's use your computer as an example. It requires energy to function. Now, let's throw in an advance AI program that's not only intelligent and capable of higher thought, but also self aware. Talk to it for a week, then unplug it. What happens to that program? Does it go off to some magical afterlife in it's "dead" state? That program only existed thanks to the curcuits, wiring, transistor's and the ENERGY needed to run the program. It never existed prior to being "born" and it doesn't go anywhere after it's "dead".
Our brain's are nothing more than a computer. One of the most advanced on this planet that evolution has evolved. Our electrochemical computer's cannot and willnot function without a source of energy. Just as the AI program in your computer. If we were able to build that AI a body it could reproduce and possibly improve upon, by every sense that machine would be "alive". It would do everything human's are capable of. But in the end, both would cease to function without a source of power. And that's what death is. Cold, unfeeling, nothingness.
And in that same respect, then you yourself don't know yourself. But, as you stated, we can't achieve peace without knowing ourselve's. So, if we only think of "one" way to know ourselve's, but that still means we don't know anything about ourselve's, then how are we to ever achieve peace in the fashion you speak of?
That's one of the wonder's of science, yes, the next einstien could come along and find a better explanation for how the universe works. A better way of describing it in theory. What we know now does work however, is experimentally proven, and put into everyday practice. If this means we don't know anything, then wouldn't this apply to language's, to math's, to reading, to just about everything. Sure, there are several ways to arrive at the same answer, but arriving at the same answer doesn't make one way any more wrong then the other. The end result would still be gravity on earth is a certain rate, for example. Relativity and quantum mechanics do work at different level's, we didn't write the "law's" to that though, we just discovered them, and I'm sure we could come up with countless other ways of describing the same effect's, but in the end, those effect's are still the same. Again, more than one way to describe one thing doesn't make one way or the other wrong.
Truthfully, in your own post's you do hint to this. Wheather you realize it or not, or unintentionally meant to. Your idea of one must know himself to achieve peace idea, would only, and only be workable if all worked to attain that same goal, and as I pointed out IF you were in a life or death situation, would you allow yourself to be killed to maintain your peacfull stance or would you kill out of self preservation. It's a very very valid question posed to your belief's of attaining peace.
One one hand, you could maintain your peacfull stance, but at the price of death, thanks to the person who doesn't hold those same views.
On the other hand, you could throw away your peacfull stance and give into the instinctual repsonses of self preservation.
And as I stated also, there will always be conflict unless all did work as one to attain peacfull coexistance. You can't have your cake and eat it to, so to speak.
No where have I stated living as parasite's. If your refering to colonizing other planet's, I honestly don't see that as being parasitical. Unless of course those planet's have indiginous life currently living on them, but even that could be argued. As for reproduction, not only would you need to take the pleasurable aspect of sex away, but also the joyfull aspect parent's have from having children. Some people just keep having as many as they can, not all, but some. My wife has a relative you did just that. Not out of need, but out of love. They loved each of their children and would have had more if it didn't damage her ovaries. There are many reason's why we have children. Many variable's you may not understand. Love, joy, pleasure, excitment, want, desire etc. Basicly you'd have to be pretty emotionless to live in the world your describing. As for it being unreasonable on a natural level, far from it. We're technologicly capable of extending our natural living space. If Earth were our only option for a natural living space, then yes, you'd be right, we are reaching our limit, on the surface atleast. Still plenty of room below ground for cities, and skyscraper cities are far from impossible even today.
As for your notion of a peacfull race, show me one definable example of such a race in existance that prove's your way of thinking.
[edit on 8-2-2006 by Produkt]
and the salt mine which they bury it in flooded about 10,000 years ago, so whos to say it wont do so again at anytime? also how long are you going to bury it for, and eventually your going to run out of room,so what then? like said none of you really think long term, its always the immediate solutions.
that physical you doesnt have an Identity in the sense its only you, you are just a part of its history of things it has become. physically you is everything. because physically everything is connected at its roots. you repeatedly say because of its characteristics that its not and thats not true.
yes that is a possibility, but tell me where any of this is PROVEN? your relying on science that isnt solid, even gravity and the basic forms of physics and such at anytime could be found to be wrong and another force could be existing, im not saying god, just not what we thought. that interia isnt the reason, and though it was a very accurate result it wasnt the most accurate or right. nothing in science is proven, because we never know if there is a more accurate answer that changes everything.
in the end you have it backwards, mentally you dont really exist, your just made to believe so. physically is the only real form you exist in any form. mentally you just trick yourself to believe otherwise. death is just your explaination for why somethings characteristics changed physically. neither of us, or machines, are above a physical state. the physical state is energy.
the peace is coming to except your mental mind is made up and your actions are just actually reactions. that death is only mental, not physical, because nothing physical can die. mentally we can die because we can experience an end, physically we cannot because there is no end, physically we are the universe. peace is knowing this much and knowing how to use your mental experience to the best of your ability, for whatever you want.
knowing ourselves is knowing why we do what we do and seeing past that. then just doing what the obvious is. the benefits and negatives of situations become clear because it will be common sense. not that its right or wrong, just the pros and cons will be obvious because we will see the long term effects and short term equally.
your failure to see the true meaning of my posts are becoming aggervating. when these simple fundamental changes occur, yes gravity is still gravity, yet because the rules are now different but with the same outcome as gravity many new doors become unlocked. sure gravity would still be but for all we know things we thought were impossible may suddenly be necessary. its funny though because it seems you cant even look far enough ahead into situations to realize these simple things. so im done here.
your black and white fine line is annoying to say the least. that in order to be at peace with yourself you have to be non violent in all cases. i never once said the race was at peace, just that i was. i dont experience conflicts anymore like you do. peace isnt something everyone would have to work to. if you were truely advanced youd see the benefits of it all and wouldnt need to work toward this goal at all, it would be just by understanding that you benefit from it. peace on a global scale isnt a group action, its an individual action. you want to believe that everyone must work together to reach peace. everyone most work with themselves to reach inner peace. you cant have a peaceful race if they have no peace within themselves.
he funny part is that you dont even see that the connection of love and joy you make with those people close to you, are the connection you should be making with every person. not to mention all the above reasons were the same chemical reactions. thats it. its not emotionless, just that you dont experience stronger emotions for certian people. you experience it for all. and i didnt say you couldnt have kids, just that it wouldnt be for the same reasons. the reasons you listed are chemcial reactions that arent always there. reproduction isnt for your joy and pleasure. reproduction is to reproduce life. these people arent your toys, and you making a bunch of new lives is pointless. reproducing is fine, but over reproducting when you dont need to is selfish.
i cant name a race because life on this planet has been around long enough to be this advanced. its that simple, maybe lightyears away from us id bet there is, just not here.
A scientific explanation of these dramatic images is that they result from interactions between charged particles created by the electromagnetic field used to form the images. A 1976 Science article concluded that moisture is a principal determinant of the form and color of human Kirlian photographs.
It has also been noted that variations in a variety of factors, including the amount of pressure on the plate, the voltage and frequency, and the exposure time, moisture, and temperature, can all influence the images produced.
For these reasons, as well as claims of unreliability and a lack of research data supporting its use, Kirlian photography is not recognized as a legitimate diagnostic tool by the mainstream medical community.
The understanding of neural relationships during NDE's has culminated in the ability to reproduce each phenomena in a controlled setting. It has been found that the intravenous administration of 50-100 mg of ketamine can safely reproduce all features of an NDE (2) and electrical stimulation of the right angular gyrus portion of the brain can safely reproduce an out of body experience (6). Scientific research has even explained why religion is emphasized during an NDE. Activation in the temporal lobe region, known as the "God Spot (7)" during an NDE is reported to stimulate religious themed thoughts (8). This research has major implications in the battle of science versus religion. It provides evidence that specific brain activity can create the perception of religion and divinity. If this is true than this brain activity can be turned off and in effect remove religion from our lives.
so does this water have a chemical reaction to different types of vibrations? vibrations are energy mind you. this isnt some opinion, its a scientific study of how energy effects the way other things such as matter react, non living things responding to energy. you dont exist mentally...plain and simple...your whole mental state is made up of different vibrations.
A number of methods exist for photographing energy fields. Among them is Kirlian photography. This method uses high frequency electron streams to photograph the invisible energy fields radiating from all living/organic things. Through a Kirlian camera, the energy emanating from the fingertip shows the difference before and minutes after drinking Dr. Emoto’s Hexagonal water.
This water must be reorganized within the body in order to penetrate the cells. However, the smaller molecular structure of hexagonal water allows for faster transit through cellular membranes. This has been verified using Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Donald Mayfield, NMD, DOM, uses BIA and a variety of other methods to access the level of health in his patients. According to Dr. Mayfield, there is no question that hexagonally-structured water provides more rapid hydration
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, or BIA, is considered one of the most exact and accessible methods of screening body fat.
Simply explained, BIA measures the impedance or resistance to the signal as it travels through the water that is found in muscle and fat. The more muscle a person has, the more water their body can hold. The greater the amount of water in a person's body, the easier it is for the current to pass through it. The more fat, the more resistance to the current. BIA is safe and it does not hurt. In fact, the signal used in body fat monitors can not be felt at all either by an adult or child.
it makes perfect sense, scientifically. the connection physically is obvious. mentally we may not even exist. we react just as the water does, the chemical reactions are just a by product of this. how hard is it for you to grip the fact dying is imaginary? those vibrations change wavelengths and change form and that thought process was just a product of it before it changed. science leans toward a unified theory where these strings of energy VIBRATE and make up all things because this is as close as we can get to the unified theory of the universe, scientific study of it shows it has causes different effects even on non living things shows the connection again.
im not going to argue with you about things you know so little about. until we start getting rid of radioactive materials to make them have 0 by product of waste with no harmful effects or dangers of world destruction, i will stand by my point. nuclear weapons came out of nuclear research, this alone shows stupidity of made and how he is uncapable of real thought.
i felt i provide you with those little bits of information so you wouldnt be left in the dark about how science is currently researching what im talkin about.