It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkmind
Originally posted by zorgon
Okay As to Altlantis there are manuscripts hidden in Tibetian lamasaries[sp?] that prove they came from a planet in the solar system. But it wasn't Mars. There was a massive war. Three planets involved... the tektites found in earth deserts are a result of blasts, the atmosphere of Mars stripped away and the third planet disintegrated and became the asteroid belt.
A large piece of the planet passed close to earth and ripped out a chunk of the pacific ocean which became our moon, and caused the ring of fire that we now have. The sun stood still in the heavens for a moment, because of the tug on earth as it was moved slightly further out from the sun into new orbit... global flooding resulted [I like that Noah's Ark was a spaceship idea... never heard it before, but it fits]
On the next orbital pass, the moon and earth plowed thru more of the debris field which is why the moon has craters only on one side. The rest of the debris imoved into what is now the asteroid belt.
There is a lot more , but that ought to stir up the pot a little.
Proof? Do I need it here? Why? No one else has any
Source?
Read T. Lobsang Rampa... there is a very concice description of how it happened and where the scrolls are kept.
[edit on 26-6-2006 by zorgon]
You're joking, right? And... the moon only has craters on one side?? Actually no. Not even close. It's been pounded for years. Craters all over the damn place.
Any impact big enough to knock out the Pacific would, (cough) have completely fried the entire planet. Made it smaller too. And the ring of fire is all to do with Plate Tectonics. No other explanation.
(Walks off muttering)
Originally posted by Darkmind
Originally posted by Stari
Hi zorgon, I have heard of this as well. Why I believe that Atlantis started out on Mars is because of all of the findings that Government satellites and rovers are finding on Mars.
Cydonia closely resembles structures from Earths ancient past. And now there is another possible skull found on the surface of Mars from one of the NASA's rovers.
External Link to new skull
Evidence is mounting!
No it's not! Again, you have the same problem as mentioned before. In the other posts above. There is no hard evidence of anything at all on Cydonia. No other sites have been spotted on the planet. Mars is too small, arid and lacking in O2 to spawn human life. The fossil record states categorically that we evolved on Earth.
Originally posted by encinoman
i agree with darkmind it would not be possible for an astroid to impact the earth at a speed to knock a chunck out of the earth it would have destroyed the earth not just a chunk
Originally posted by Stari
Originally posted by encinoman
i agree with darkmind it would not be possible for an astroid to impact the earth at a speed to knock a chunck out of the earth it would have destroyed the earth not just a chunk
Now I'm not saying that this happened, but it is possible that the asteroid belt is made of of pieces of another planet that did hit the Earth and broke into lots of pieces that is now our asteroid belt.
That is also one theory of how our moon was created.
Originally posted by encinoman
Originally posted by Stari
Originally posted by encinoman
i agree with darkmind it would not be possible for an astroid to impact the earth at a speed to knock a chunck out of the earth it would have destroyed the earth not just a chunk
Now I'm not saying that this happened, but it is possible that the asteroid belt is made of of pieces of another planet that did hit the Earth and broke into lots of pieces that is now our asteroid belt.
That is also one theory of how our moon was created.
yes i agree with that but i do not think that the moon was once part of the earth
Originally posted by Stari
Hi zorgon, I have heard of this as well. Why I believe that Atlantis started out on Mars is because of all of the findings that Government satellites and rovers are finding on Mars.
Cydonia closely resembles structures from Earths ancient past. And now there is another possible skull found on the surface of Mars from one of the NASA's rovers.
External Link to new skull
Evidence is mounting!
Originally posted by fred3110
mars may have had an atmosphere like earths in this book i read by Graham Hancock (mars maystery) theres 3 huge craters each one a planet kiler on its own and these may have hit mars and basically obliterated it, further proof of this is the Hellas canyon which may have occured when the force traveled through the core of the planet and ejected it into space. scientists couldnt pin point exactly what time these occoured so it could be 20,000 years it could be 20 million years
(personally i think 20,000 as it would explain alot of these myths and legends!)
if there was any life forms there i doubt they lived on the red planet we know of but if there planet was going to be destroyed and they had forwarning of it they may have escaped to earth.
Source
One of the theories put forward by Joe Kolecki to explain the formation of volcanoes on Mars was that of the meteor impact theory. It goes something like this: some of the volcanoes on Mars can be explained if we consider that a meteor had crashed into the planet at some point. The force of such an impact would reverberate through the planet and force volcanoes to 'bulge' out on the other side.
...On investigating Helles and Tharsis further we found that Tharsis was not actually on the point 180° from Helles as one would have expected if assuming meteor theory was correct. We questioned as to why this was not the case and figured that if Mars had a molten core, like the Earth's, then the energy waves that would have been given out by the impact would pass through this core and be refracted, thus changing the angle at which they would leave the core. This would result in the energy waves surfacing at a point not 180° away from the point of impact (see Fig. 1). This line of reasoning would then explain as to why Helles and Tharsis are where they are on Mars.
...These values that we calculated showed that the energy required to melt a mass the size of Tharsis would be produced by a meteor impact of the size of the diameter of the Helles.
My emphases.
Detailed analyses of the SNC meteorites made it clear that not long after Mars accreted into a world, its interior was already hot and had differentiated into a nickel-iron core, mantle, and crust. Much of the heat at this stage must have come from the energy of the impacts themselves. Thus, Martian volcanism began early. During late Noachian and early Hesperian times, melted rock (magma) began to reach the surface. Extensive ridged plains were laid down in areas of the southern hemisphere; the so-called highland paterae also emerged, of which four are located near the Hellas basin and probably were formed in relation to deep-seated fractures produced during the impact that formed it.
Again, my emphases.
Since we are trying to unravel the history of Mars we are always mentioning dates in the past when we think certain events ocurred. It is helpful, therefore, to note a few terms that photo-geologists use when talking about Mars. The first period of martian history ("morning" if you will) is called the Noachian period -- Noachis happens to be a good example of (ancient cratered highland) terrain that dates back to that time of heavy asteroidal bombardment (about 4.3 billion years ago to 3.5 billion years). The second period of martian history ("afternoon") is called the Hesperian period, the period after the heavy bombardment had tapered off. Hesperia Planitia is, naturally, a good example of (plains) terrain that dates back to that time (about 3.5 billion years to 1.8 billion years). The third period ("evening") is called Amazonian -- obviously, Amazonia Planitia is the type example of the (least cratered volcanic) plains that typify the last billion and a half years of martian history.
Originally posted by Darkmind
Originally posted by Stari
I have done enough research to know that Atlantis really did exist around 10,500 years ago. I believe that they were around for hundreds of thousands of years. They came from a very well known planet with in our Solar System, Mars. I have images that I have collected from NASA’s public image archive that show the remnants of a civilization that once lived on Mars. I also have an image of a hieroglyph on a stone that was found on Mars. A hieroglyph means that after the Atlanteans were forced to leave Mars and settle here on Earth that they spread their knowledge to the people that where here, the people we know call the Egyptians.
Unfortunately Mars isn't a viable place for life to develop. Not unless it likes breathing very thin carbon dioxide, can live in a low-pressure environment and doesn't need much water. I'm not saying that the above is impossible, but it does mean that the Earth would not be a very nice place for them to live. The other thing is that any life form that develops on another planet would not look like us, the human race. It would start off from a different base of species and develop different charecteristics as it evolved. (And by the way, the human body is not a perfect bipedal form. The stomach is wired up as an awkward compromise for a something that started off horizontal and ended up vertical, and an awful lot of stuff to do with out noses and mouths drains into the lungs and not out of us, making us prone to lung infections.)
Originally posted by Lexion
I too think Atlantean's came from another planet. But, I'm not going to point to a specific planet, because I'm not sure which.
I theorize that their planet was called Atlantis, or something similar, and that their journey to Earth was an effort to save their people/culture.
I believe they arrived here around 11,000 - 10,000 BCE. This coincides with most modern scholars views of a tech-boom among humans.
Since the ship/craft they came in would be a "lifeboat" of sorts, there would be limited space. The people they brought would be scientists and such. They spread their knowledge as they could, but as they died out, the more primitive people that they were trying to tutor could only do so much, with this knowledge.
But, it did inspire legends that have similar tones, in most every civilization on the globe at that time.
Just my 2 cents,
Lex
Originally posted by Stari
So, can you please educate me on Atlantians actually existing?
I'm not sure what information you are asking for. If you do not know the story of Atlantis then you may wish to do a search on Plato critias and timaous.
If Atlanteans showed up here on Earth 10,000 years ago then they would not have had time to build the grand civilization that Plato speaks of before the sinking of their main city.
Originally posted by princeea
Originally posted by voodoo child
if there were atlantians and they did spread there knowledge all that time ago, then i think we would be much more advanced then we are now.
like if they can travel between planets all that time ago, how come we can't now?
If something happened now, like a flood, could you make a cell phone? Or even a pizza? Knowledge was lost, thats what the pyramids were supposedly for ( accoring to the book of enoch ) to store books with infomation to get us back on track. Its like we start over after every cataclysim.
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
some theories claim the arck of noah was a space ship. might be noah left mars and went to earth.
Originally posted by BradKellBrrexkl
that he got his information from the Egyptians. He was given these stories on trips to the Library of Alexandria, if I recall correctly....
Originally posted by Chris the watcher
Not gonna rip you too much but... we only have a limited knowlege of where and how life comes about, mars has been very different in its past, look up the mars bulge, some out-there scientists believe that a vast comet/asteroid (perhaps even our moon) hit mars causing the loss of atmosphere and devestaion of life, infact some scientists say mars would have been a more stable enviroment for life to develop. Though im not so sure atlantis was e.t. origin, though they might have been in contact with em!
Originally posted by fred3110
mars may have had an atmosphere like earths in this book i read by Graham Hancock (mars maystery) theres 3 huge craters each one a planet kiler on its own and these may have hit mars and basically obliterated it,
further proof of this is the Hellas canyon which may have occured when the force traveled through the core of the planet and ejected it into space.
Originally posted by Chris the watcher
...Im a big Graham Hancock(icke, von dankien etc) Fan.. But... i do take his/their theory's with a pinch of salt! (or a handful in some case's)
my question is, Why so many of us take to reading these "out there" books/theories?
Why are their idea's so attractive to so many of us?!
Originally posted by Chris the watcherand what are we suposed to do? cos most of us (especially on here) are hear to discuss these "out there" idea's, moderators/members are moaning about the retelling of already known or debunked idea's (which i think is absoulutley idiotic- surely they is a continuing legion of new members each month with NO prior knowlegde of this site or great deal of understanding in the "out there" field" !