Is it possible that the Atlanteans came from a planet in our own solar system?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 25-1-2006 @ 10:32 PM by Stari
Originally posted by Harte
Stari,
You are right, I shouldn't be so curt, I suppose. But these things have been covered here before, try the search function.

Please limit your use of the word "prove" to when you actually mean prove. Try using the phrase "evidence of" or something.

Now, let me apologize. Also, you should admit that about fifteen or twenty minutes on Google will turn up these articles you've "found over the years." No research is necessary. The real work is digging into these bogus reports and finding out if they are real or hoaxes.
Also, please relate what is so earth-shattering about a couple of skulls being misdated?

Are you of the opinion that someone is "covering up" some find that was made there?

I cannot believe that you can't find at least some reports of the "lost city" found off Cuba. Did you try googling "sunken city Cuba"?
Here, let me give you a leg up:

Sunken Cuban City Google Search

That particular wording for the search returned a mere 47,200 website hits.

Harte


Well Harte let's start off by saying I did a search for Mars atlantis on this board. Nothing came up that was relevant to my topic.

And doesn't proof mean evidence? evidence would be proof.. hmm maybe i'm going out on a limb on that one.. look up proof on dictionary.com.

And let me apologize.. what EVIDENCE might you have that the skulls were misdated? And if you are going to state something about carbon testing .. dont bother.. i dont believe that is an accurate way to date. Carbon can change in our atmosphere and in our air daily.. say a volcano erupts.. it changes the carbon around that area.

I dont believe anyone is covering anything up in Cuba. I just dont think it holds enough importance to the Cubans ... they are paying her to find gold and silver.. not blocks of rock that was possibly once a city.

When I do my research I look for reputable sites, like news sites or sites where people has actual EVIDENCE. Not someones theory on the findings. Yes I am sure you can find thousands of sites when you google it.. But I mostly look at CNN, Reuters those kinds of sites.

Star


reply posted on 26-1-2006 @ 01:12 PM by BradKellBrrexkl
it's like this. The skulls show nothing about Atlantis. The dildo in Germany shows nothing of Atlantis. The lady in Cuba has reported nothing of Atlantis.

Remember, I'm keeping an open mind. In fact, I'd love the romantic tales of Atlantis to be true, and have wondered often where such a place could be on our planet. The closes you've come up with is South America, and I hope I'm not assuming, but pretty much as a whole with the Great and Lessers being the 'rings'.

Now, let me lead this a bit further. This would mean that trade or war... or both, would be easily possible amonst the Atlantians and the Inca/Aztecs/other S.A. Tribes and Cultures... AND with their northern brethern in North America. Sioux, Creek, and other Native Tribes. Oh, not to mention the actual inhabitants of the Islands. After all, if the Atlantians CAME here, then another group native to the islands would have already been in place.

Now, using the entire Western Hemisphere, show me and recorded actions of trade, diplomacy, or war with the Atlantians and their closest and nearest neighbors.

It is quiet fishy that Spartans would be the enemy and have the records when they were tiny at the time... and such great wealth and resources could be found right next door. If such proof of the Spartan engagements occured, you would expect (or at least I do) such records to be with in the Western world.

Now, stated earlier was a Native American's tribe to being the Atlantians. Very interesting. If this were true (though only oral tradition backs it up) that would mean that Atlantis couldn't be as described to Plato.

Like I said, I'm looking to be educated here. Before we should even consider which planet such a group came from, we should first establish that they were here. If I'm just speaking muttered garbage, feel free to blast it away with proof and facts and sources. I'd be most obliged.


reply posted on 26-1-2006 @ 03:12 PM by Harte
Originally posted by Stari
And doesn't proof mean evidence? evidence would be proof.. hmm maybe i'm going out on a limb on that one.. look up proof on dictionary.com.

And let me apologize.. what EVIDENCE might you have that the skulls were misdated? And if you are going to state something about carbon testing .. dont bother.. i dont believe that is an accurate way to date. Carbon can change in our atmosphere and in our air daily.. say a volcano erupts.. it changes the carbon around that area.


Stari,
Evidence means an indication that some particular idea or theory might be true. Proof means that it is indisputably true. I know, I know, it's common usage might be that the word "proof" is used to indicate "evidence" of something. But I think that when making wild claims, one must be a stickler about using the word "proof."
Remember, "proof" proves something. "Evidence" only indicates something. The difference is extremely important. Just ask O.J. Simpson.

As far as evidence of the misdating of the two skulls, that was the subject of the article itself. You know, the one you linked to. It was about the discovery that a couple of skulls had been misdated. I myself don't personally have any evidence of this, only what you have provided, but the BBC article you linked to said that, while the skulls had previously been dated to 130,000 years old (in 1967), they have recently been re-dated to about 195,000 years old. That's not exactly earthshaking, as the article itself indicates. It says there:


It puts the specimens close to the time expected for the evolutionary emergence of our species. Genetic studies have indicated Homo sapiens arose in East Africa - possibly Ethiopia or Tanzania - just over 200,000 years ago.
(Quoted directly from your linked-to BBC story - my emphasis)

My point being that this new date is not revolutionary, we already knew humans were that old (if not older.)

Originally posted by Stari
I dont believe anyone is covering anything up in Cuba. I just dont think it holds enough importance to the Cubans ... they are paying her to find gold and silver.. not blocks of rock that was possibly once a city.


Paulina Zelitsky's company (she's co-owner with her husband - A.D.C. Advanced Digital Communications is their company, based originally out of Canada,) was working under contract collecting ocean temperatures for a global warming study when they found their supposed "lost city."

Since then, ADC has been contracted by National Geographic, as well as the Havana Museum of Natural History. They are certainly not solely "looking for gold and silver" (though, come to think of it, I certainly would.) My guess is they can't find funding because it's extremely expensive to conduct archaeology underwater, especially at that depth.
Here's a link to a web page with the photos she took, for anyone out there that doesn't know what this is about.

www.freerepublic.com...

Here's a link to the National Geographic story that's referenced in that site (and maybe referenced around here somewhere too.)
news.nationalgeographic.com... ities.html

Originally posted by StariWhen I do my research I look for reputable sites, like news sites or sites where people has actual EVIDENCE. Not someones theory on the findings. Yes I am sure you can find thousands of sites when you google it.. But I mostly look at CNN, Reuters those kinds of sites.
Star

That is certainly commendable, at least you don't hang out at crystal links trying to find out the latest on the reptilian shapeshifters, right?

If you insert the "CNN" or "Reuters" into your google search terms, you might find these articles in less time, and with more thoroughness.


Harte



reply posted on 27-1-2006 @ 11:24 AM by BradKellBrrexkl
Re-Posted, in case Stari didn't see it.

Okay,

it's like this. The skulls show nothing about Atlantis. The dildo in Germany shows nothing of Atlantis. The lady in Cuba has reported nothing of Atlantis.

Remember, I'm keeping an open mind. In fact, I'd love the romantic tales of Atlantis to be true, and have wondered often where such a place could be on our planet. The closes you've come up with is South America, and I hope I'm not assuming, but pretty much as a whole with the Great and Lessers being the 'rings'.

Now, let me lead this a bit further. This would mean that trade or war... or both, would be easily possible amonst the Atlantians and the Inca/Aztecs/other S.A. Tribes and Cultures... AND with their northern brethern in North America. Sioux, Creek, and other Native Tribes. Oh, not to mention the actual inhabitants of the Islands. After all, if the Atlantians CAME here, then another group native to the islands would have already been in place.

Now, using the entire Western Hemisphere, show me and recorded actions of trade, diplomacy, or war with the Atlantians and their closest and nearest neighbors.

It is quiet fishy that Spartans would be the enemy and have the records when they were tiny at the time... and such great wealth and resources could be found right next door. If such proof of the Spartan engagements occured, you would expect (or at least I do) such records to be with in the Western world.

Now, stated earlier was a Native American's tribe to being the Atlantians. Very interesting. If this were true (though only oral tradition backs it up) that would mean that Atlantis couldn't be as described to Plato.

Like I said, I'm looking to be educated here. Before we should even consider which planet such a group came from, we should first establish that they were here. If I'm just speaking muttered garbage, feel free to blast it away with proof and facts and sources. I'd be most obliged.


reply posted on 29-1-2006 @ 03:56 PM by Stari
Hi BradKellBrrexkl,

I did miss your post.. I’m very sorry for that. I believe that the evidence is out there showing that intelligent life forms have been on this planet for a long time. The modern human skulls show that modern humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years.. Possibly longer. And the ancient phallus was made approximately 28,000 years ago.. According to scientists we had just learned how to make fire a few thousand years prior.

Now scientists say that Mars has been with out water for millions of years.. Well that is just a guess on their part it has not been proven, at least not to my knowledge. I am in no way an expert, I am fascinated by all of this stuff and I am constantly trying to boost my knowledge of anything that could help solve the puzzle of humanities beginnings. That is why I have been researching this subject for a long time now. But I do have a day job

You said that Paula Z. has not reported anything about Atlantis. I would assume that is because she has not been back to the area for more research or I have read a lot how when scientists even mention the word Atlantis then they are no longer taken seriously. As far as why she has not said “Atlantis” is unknown to me.

Your talking about the Atlanteans trading with the Incas and the Mayans, that could not have been possible for the Atlanteans lived way before them. They are possibly descendants of the Atlanteans, I’m not saying they are.. I am only saying it is possible.

Have I left anything out? I am sorry I missed your post earlier.


reply posted on 31-1-2006 @ 07:49 AM by Darkmind
Originally posted by Stari
Now scientists say that Mars has been with out water for millions of years.. Well that is just a guess on their part it has not been proven, at least not to my knowledge. I am in no way an expert, I am fascinated by all of this stuff and I am constantly trying to boost my knowledge of anything that could help solve the puzzle of humanities beginnings. That is why I have been researching this subject for a long time now. But I do have a day job

Astronomers and geologists have been looking at Mars for some time, especially thanks to the Mars Rovers missions which are, believe it or not, still going. The fact is that Mars is smaller than Earth, it's atmosphere is far thinner, and that geologically it's a bit dead. Olympus Mons, the largest volcano in the solar system, is either extinct or very very dormant. They can tell by the number of craters on its slopes, showing that there has not been any eruptive material ejected from the volcano for millions of years. The craters also prove that there hasn't been any rain there for millions of years. We know there's water there, but it's frozen hard and covered by dust. So yes, a guess, but based on the evidence, a very plausible guess. Secondly, and I'd like to borrow a bullhorn here, there is no evidence that the Atlanteans a) existed and b) came from another planet!
We're talking about another world, different evolutionary pressures so therefore fat chance of them looking like us, no evidence of any structures indicating a long-lived civilisation, and the fact that only one author ever mentions them. Oh and no proof that Homo Sapiens evolved anywhere other than Africa.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 3 days ago with 80 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 15 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags