It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
One last question, if terrorists kill children, as the are want to do, it's their fault. If western forces kill children, why is it still the terrorists fault?
Originally posted by intrepid
Are the children the suspected terrorists children?
Delving into that would take the anonimity out of it and we would have to think of the human aspect of what is going on. You won't hear any of this on ANY western news agency.
If western forces kill children, why is it still the terrorists fault?
Originally posted by parrhesia
I think for some it is an issue of moral superiority. The end (killing suspected or known terrorists) justifies the means (bombing/attacking and killing innocents) for Western forces, but that is not applied to terrorist forces. It's a double standard, but in the end the result is the same: innocent children are being killed.
One last question, if terrorists kill children, as the are want to do, it's their fault. If western forces kill children, why is it still the terrorists fault?
Originally posted by Duzey
For those who do have no problem with the innocents being killed, I would like a little intellectual honesty. The deaths are the fault of the person who killed them. If an American child is more valuable than a Middle Eastern child, then just say so. I will disagree and think it is disgusting, but I may at least have some respect for the honesty.
In WWII we ruthlessly killed over 100K civilians in the span of just over a few days at Hiroshima and Nagasaki to prevent the substantial loss of white, male, American lives. Without so much as an extended debate.
Originally posted by curme
If I was conspiracy minded, I would think that the government is trying to desensitize us. First, try it out on a bunch of brown people who talk funny, that no one will miss. Get people used to the idea of innocents being killed for the greater good. So when it starts happening in your home town, when the police or government agents kill the many, to kill the few, people will be used to the idea.
And when the government arrests everyone in the whole building for one neighbor, people will be thankful. "Hey, at least were alive!"
Originally posted by Pyros
An interesting challenge. Well, lets put this in perspective. First, one must ask this basic question: is the life of a child more valuable than the life of an adult? Any why? And if a terrorist bomber is 12 years old, does he receive any dispensation, versus that of a 22 year old?
It isn't an issue of moral superiority. That implies that American approve of the needless killing of innocent lives. That thought is repugnant to most of us. However, as the world goes 'round and the game is played, innocent people are gonna get killed. I would say that it is more an effect of geopolitical darwinism, if anything.
I've seen it said that the "terrorists use children as a human shield".
Intellectually, I know it's a horrible loss for someone, but emotionally it's not a huge blow
It isn't an issue of moral superiority. That implies that American approve of the needless killing of innocent lives. That thought is repugnant to most of us. However, as the world goes 'round and the game is played, innocent people are gonna get killed. I would say that it is more an effect of geopolitical darwinism, if anything.
Originally posted by AlphaHumana
That's the most accurate snippet of the thread, imo. Most of the people here seem to believe that forces don't care and/or are actively targetting innocent civilians. If we didn't care about killing innocents we wouldn't have spent billions upon billions developing precision weapons that are designed to harm only what we're aiming at. If we didn't care about innocents the conflict in Iraq would have been over in an instant, as we simply would have just levelled the entire country. All of our servicemen that we've lost are due to our sensitivity and compassion in not simply killing everything that moves.
Originally posted by Pyros
And yes, the life of my daughter is much more valuable (to me) than the life of any other middle-eastern child. Not because of moral superiority. If you want to sing "We are the world" and believe that all peoples of all nations should have the same rights and priviledges as we Americans, then let them kill your child. You can take solace in the fact that the child of the tribal elder who teaches his people to hate and kill us, was spared at the expense of yours. Maybe that makes you morally superior to me, but I prefer to be morally inferior and have in intact family.