There is a set of prophesies that have been released that talk about a multiple city attack on Monday Jan 23, 2006. The cities to be struck are:
Cincinnati, San Francisco, Montreal, Atlanta, Dallas and Washington DC.
Other people are coming forward with revelations and visions of two of the six cities. Several people see both the San Francisco Golden Gate Bridge
collapse and the Washington DC Nuclear or Dirty bomb attack, including Chuck Colson, former Nixon aide, now Christian, on townhall.com (1/3/2006).
The most collected read of these prophecies and their surrounding confirmations and news items is at:
Intelligence agencies are picking up increased chatter and then there's the recent multiple tracphone prepaid cell phone (untraceable) purchases in
lots of 60 to 120 around the country by middle eastern men recently.
I am working on a theory about why now and not in the last few years after 9/11. The Bush administration would have us believe that fighting "them
over there" makes us safer over here. However, nothing I have seen that we have done over there prevents an end-around by terrorists through a
porous Mexican border to attack us here. We are among the, if not "the", most hated country in the world right now. So, if you can't stop the
attack and one has not happened but several countries have every motivation to attack us....then what's left:
Could it be that we are involved in the selection of the timing of the attack?
Could it be that the only thing left is to make the most of the opportunities presented by such an attack?
The most basic sovereign principle of a nation's definition is its ability to make war. That's political theory 101. The most basic principle of
marketing is to present the problem in terms of the solution you are offering.
If you can't stop the attack, then time the attack at a point when you most need it to bolster your cause and the systems required to implement
surveillance and control of persons is finally ready.
Suppose, just suppose, there was no further attack on the US in the last 4 1/2 years because the societal changes and systems required to enforce the
reductions in civil liberties that would result were not yet ready.
The greatest opportunity to effect societal changes toward a more closed, watched, totalitarian society is done by the changes in monitoring required
to fight an infiltrated enemy. This is no longer a war in which there are defined battle lines as was WWII. The enemy is mixed in with us so the
surveillance, tracking, suppression of liberties has to apply to everyone here. This type of battle provides the greatest potential to lock-down an
entire people or nation within their own borders.
I have this funny feeling that perhaps, starting on Jan 24th, you will be hard-pressed to find new headlines complaining about NSA wiretapping or
debates about Patriot Act extensions.
Could it be the image of the revived Roman Empire has the US at the head of it? Is it perhaps merely a coincidence that a recent CNS article debates
whether the green light given to Al-Qaeda for their next attack was really to attack the US with a code-name of Rome?
al Qaeda Video is 'Green Light' for Attack, Analyst Warns
By Sherrie Gossett - CNSNews.com Staff Writer - January 11, 2006