It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Probably for the same reason that some friends of ours got a new Miata after theirs got flipped and had less than $5000 damage to it. Because the Insurance Company said so.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Probably for the same reason that some friends of ours got a new Miata after theirs got flipped and had less than $2000 damage to it. Because the Insurance Company said so.
[edit on 1/31/2006 by Zaphod58]
Originally posted by ANOK
*Shakes head* No, it throws suspicion on the whole 'a plane cliped the lightpoles' and discredits all the eye witness reports from the overpass.
Have you been reading this thread or what?
We've gone over this already, I think you should know what the point is.
Why do those who buy the official story have to act like they don't understand, surely just because you don't agree it doesn't mean you don't understand
How do you explain the guy needing a new cab, when there was obviously only damage to the windshield?
Originally posted by _shadow_
Ok...let me get this straight..he was driving along..the plane flew over at 500 MPH, hit the pole it came crashing down onto his car. Took a few seconds to stop the car. Then he got out, this guy came over to help him move the pole( which took about a minute im guessing). THen he heard the blast?!?!?! Righttttttttttt. Look how close the pentagon is to that car. By the time he got out of his car the plane going 500MPH would of hit the pentagon. Im not that good with distance and speed but to me that just looks like common sense.
Originally posted by ANOK
You say the story stinks but you believe terrorist did it with a 757, so what part of the story actualy stinks then?
Originally posted by ANOK
And Dear father luke how would the cab have a bent axle when it didn't even damage the cars body work? Must be made from some tough metal alloy or something?
Originally posted by ANOK
You say the story stinks but you believe terrorist did it with a 757, so what part of the story actualy stinks then?
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
They may be covering for something that could bring the government down, or maybe not. Though Bush et al will sleeping soundly tonight while you lot endlessly debate the position of broken glass outside the pentagon.
Originally posted by ANOK
I think we're being lied to.
Originally posted by ANOK
You always throw a lot of opinions on other ppl around this web site (see any chemtrail thread) but bring no actual content to the discusion.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Where else are we witnessing the technique of creating polarizing debates as a means of manipulation?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Strange that every other light pole I've ever seen anywhere are straight, except for the arm that holds the light. That's the only curved part I've EVER seen on any lightpole anywhere. Even in other countries.