It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subz
If these Zionist founders of Israel were atheist then hating them would not be anti-Jewish!
Originally posted by Riwka
Please do NOT forget, that Jews are a people- and Judaism is a religion.
Source
According to Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics, at the end of 2004, of Israel's 6.9 million people, 76.2% were Jews, 19.5% Arabs, and 4.3% "others".
Originally posted by Riwka
Of course it would be anti-jewish!
Please do NOT forget, that Jews are a people- and Judaism is a religion.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Subz, you have clearly ignored what I have earlier said, that it is the Jews who die when "Zionism" is attacked.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
You prefer to totally ignore the fact that the leader of Iran will kill all in Israel, if he get's his way and the weapons.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
You prefer to play word games, totally ignoring what the reality is.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
What would you say if it happens that Israel is again attacked and men, women and children are killed by the train loads? "Oops; I was wrong!"?
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
There is some serious racism going on here in the name of love and fairness, if you ask me.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
By the way, I searched and searched for Zionist terror last night, but found nothing. Google never lets me down. Must have been a Zionist plot!
1,480,000 for zionist terror. (0.52 seconds)
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
The leader of Iran will use this "debate" to rally and marshall the anti-semites and beat them into a frothy fury.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Subz, please try and discuss in a normal manner instead of the lazy quoting isolated portions of the conversation.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
I show enough respect to talk in paragraph forms, and you show the lack thereof by simply quoting bits and making mini-threads in this one.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Thjanks for the link, by the way, I didn't find even the anti-Semitic webs that you did.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
I won't even bother to discuss the hatred and BS propaganda that I found.
"For the first time, the president of a United Nations member state has dared openly to spread publicly such views that deny the Holocaust," [the stetement] read.
The groups "call on all those with political responsibility in the whole world - and particularly in Europe, where most of the victims of the deadly lunacy of the Nazis were from - to condemn unanimously and unconditionally these unacceptable comments."
(Associated Press)
Once again, why can these debate not take place bar the sensitivities of Jewism members of society? Once again, why can one not argue against historical paradigms?
The Iranian president holding a conference to assess the scale and consequences of the Holocaust is like Nazi Skinheads holding a conference discussing the legitimacy of having non-whites in America
Originally posted by Luxifero
The Iranian president holding a conference to assess the scale and consequences of the Holocaust is like Nazi Skinheads holding a conference discussing the legitimacy of having non-whites in America
That's a horrible analogy that asserts that the man is racist, and thereby all those that facilitate and engage in this debate are as well. Once again, this is simply a baseless attack, not enough creedence to provide objection to having debate. You're catering malignity for the Iranian president here, and though he has made his opinion clear on the nation-state of Isreal, it does not decry his obstinacy for debate over the praticularism of the holocaust.
Luxifero