posted on Jan, 18 2006 @ 10:27 AM
I have two predictions, one being the likely scenario, and one being what I believe to be the worst case scenario.
Likely scenario: Iran will resist accepting any deals, including Russia's offer to enrich uranium on its soil, until it feels it will gain more by
complying than it will lose by doing so. The U.N. Security Council will, in time, pass a resolution demanding in no uncertain terms that Iran allow
inspections, and that they halt further nuclear development, peaceful or otherwise. The resolution will imply the threat of sanctions, but will
be worded such that Russia and China will either accept or abstain, but won't veto it. Iran will then strike a deal with the West, or Russia,
averting further escalation. Iran will be allowed to develop peaceful nuclear power, or, if they are indeed seeking a weapon, the crisis will reappear
after a year or two.
Worst case, highly improbable scenario: Iran will refuse to accept international demands, and the U.N. will vote down U.S. initiatives to apply
stricter sanctions, due to rising oil costs. The U.S. will continue to push for this, but will make little progress. Seeing this, and feeling
sufficiently threatened by Iran, Israel will launch unilateral air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran will undoubtedly retaliate. The U.S.
will side with Israel, along (possibly) with other allies, but many will either stay on the sidelines or will instead opt to condemn Iran
diplomatically via a U.N. resolution (which will, however, also call for a quick end to hostilities by both sides).
Another intifada will rip through Israel in support of Iran's plight, and tensions will mount between Lebanon and Israel until Lebanon enters the war
as well. Syria will use the conflict to promote its influence inside Lebanon, but may stay out of the direct conflict. Major terror attacks may strike
European countries who side with the Israeli alliance, and this will likely persuade them to enter the conflict as well. Saudi Arabia and Egypt will
likely not be involved in the conflict, nor will Jordan. Iran or another player may attack neighbors who allow U.S. and other Western forces to use
their facilities or air space.
Any remaining stability in Iraq will deteriorate rapidly as coalition forces are at least partially redeployed. This will likely be where NATO allies
on the sidelines will take part in the conflict, via U.N. peace-keeping necessary to assist in Iraq's stabilization. The speed and effectiveness with
which this occurs will determine how out of hand inter-factional disputes in Iraq and Afghanistan become as the U.S. presence diminishes slightly. If
it isn't fast or effective enough, the possibility of Kurdish independence may be perceived by Turkey, who may enter the conflict as well.
China would probably not be caught dead fighting on the same side as the U.S. but will recognize that stability in the region is in their interest,
and cannot be served by their entrance into the conflict which would trigger a war that would cost both sides dearly, just as they are on the verge of
flourishing economically. As I said, however, they wouldn't be caught dead fighting in cooperation with the U.S., so Russia will represent a joint
Chinese-Russian stance, offering limited logistical, intelligence, and possibly even limited military support to the U.S. and its allies, to ensure
stability as soon as possible, and to avoid being viewed in a more adversarial light by the West.
Iran and any allies will be defeated, and rather than a U.S. or coalition occupation, peace-keeping forces under the flag of the U.N. or E.U. will
remain in the region on a semi-permanent basis to sustain post-war stability. The global economy will gradually recover, and a much less liberal
international structure will emerge, in which the U.S. and E.U. deal more directly in the affairs of other nations' political and military policies,
particularly those of Israel and its neighbors.
Civil liberties throughout the Western world will be scaled back somewhat more than they already have been, as the threat of terrorism is greater than
at any time in history. Our lives will experience greater intrusiveness on the part of our respective governments as a result. Nations that are
thought to pose the kind of threats Iran and North Korea are thought to, will be dealt with much earlier and with greater consensus than they are
presently. North Korea will probably be targeted for regime change within a decade following the Middle-Eastern war.
Russia will likely play both sides as much as possible, while China will firmly resist any attempt to alter its economic, political, or military
growth. There will be a cold war with China, and Russia will play both sides until it becomes a hot war. The reason it will become a hot war will be
because China's economy is too indispensable to the world to have been eroded despite being viewed as an adversary. Thus they will not implode
economically as the Soviet Union did.
When they feel they have the capability to take Taiwan, or when we feel we have no choice but to pre-empt that capability, there will be open warfare.
Russia will support China politically and perhaps in terms of resources and technology, but will do its best not to enter the war. When it becomes
clear who the victor is most likely to be, Russia will side with them. So the war will either be, in its climax, the world vs. China, or the world vs.
China and Russia.
There are no good predictive models, contrary to popular belief, for who would win a direct conflict between the West and China. It can be
successfully argued that for every technological and intelligence advantage the West has, China has enough sheer manpower to counter it, and
vice-versa.
Near defeat, the vanquished - whoever that is - will either surrender, or launch a nuclear strike. If the latter, the enemy will respond in kind, and
the world as we know it will end. If the former, and the West is victorious, then with the Middle-East pacified (or at least under controlled), and
U.S. and E.U. (and Russian, if Russia still exists) interests being essentially cooperative or identical in nature, and with China annihilated, a new
global order will arise. If China is victorious, Europe and the U.S. will fall in power and influence in the world, and China will expand its sphere
of influence in the Pacific, and a new but different order will rise.
Well, those are my predictions lol.
[edit on 18-1-2006 by AceWombat04]
[edit on 18-1-2006 by AceWombat04]
[edit on 18-1-2006 by AceWombat04]