It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bush urges Iran nuclear diplomacy
US President George W Bush has said he wants to resolve the Iranian nuclear crisis through peaceful means.
After talks in Washington with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Mr Bush said both leaders sought to solve the issue "diplomatically by working together".
President Bush refused to be drawn on whether the UN Security Council should impose sanctions on Iran.
Iran insists it has a right to peaceful nuclear technology and denies seeking atomic weapons.
It has threatened to halt snap inspections of its nuclear facilities and resume uranium enrichment if the issue is sent to the Security Council.
Ms Merkel - on her first US visit since taking office - said Europe and the US must take a united stand on Iran.
On Thursday, the German, French and British foreign ministers called for the UN to deal with Iran's nuclear programme.
But, in a sign of divisions within the international community over how to proceed, China's UN ambassador Wang Guangya warned on Friday that referring Iran to the Security Council "might complicate the issue".
Originally posted by 27jd
By the way bodrul, funny avatar. Is that a jewish Roger Ramjet? (man I'm getting old)
Originally posted by bodrul
wouldnt know
who roger ramjet
on another note it is kind of shocking seeing Bush talk deplomacy
or it could be a cover plan for an attack
www.kommersant.com...
The European Union decided to break off negotiations with Iran on its nuclear program.
The final decision on the holding of an extraordinary meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the forwarding of the Iranian dossier to the UN Security Council will be made next week in London at negotiations with representatives of the United States, EU, Russia and China.
Originally posted by bodrul
Revolutionary Guard in Iran are suppose to be the highly trained so its no supprise that they are the ones garding it
better defended then left wide open to be flatened
namehere
its a militia, not "highly" trained soldiers
dronetek
At this point, I fully support an invasion.
Originally posted by namehere
bodrul, its a militia, not "highly" trained soldiers.
Originally posted by Nygdan
No way man, these are battle hardened zealots. The iraqi Republican Guard melted away and maybe at most made up part of the insurgency. The Revolutionary Guard will not be dispensed with so easily.
Originally posted by Tripnastic
Originally posted by Nygdan
No way man, these are battle hardened zealots. The iraqi Republican Guard melted away and maybe at most made up part of the insurgency. The Revolutionary Guard will not be dispensed with so easily.
They USED to be battle hardened. The last conflict Iran had, ended in 1988. 18 years of not doing ANYTHING. Were this whole nuclear situation happening in 1989, I would agree that we would be taking on a formidable foe, but in this case it will be your average trained soldier we'll be fighting against.