It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
There is a universal controversy involving the issue of spiritual authority. To resolve it, there can be no confusion, and no inversion of God. The embodiment of the spiritual authority was exemplified by the submissive will of Christ unto the cross, as a meaningful expression of the higher will.
Thus, any conscious and willful negation of that authority, or any attempt at a usurpation of it, will place the "practitioner" of any craft or progression to enlightenment at odds with the spirit of the universe, the first father of creation, and the "Abba" of Jesus own intimate relationship with that spirit of God.
I have seen enough in this thread to show a confusion regarding this issue.
It should be remembered that the work and power of God was made manifest through the Exodus from Egypt, where we see a greater power redering the lessor power impotent. Thus, with respect to Osiris, it is plain that God's will involved a differentiation from that system, and a covenent or a promise which culminated in the Christ entering the frame.
Furthermore, wasn't Osiris murdered, his body parts strewn everywhere, his penis lost in the Nile, possible eaten by a fish? In contrast, there was no "loss of integrity" through Jesus' death, and thus we see in Osiris a false resurreciton, which may have led to the practice of mumification, and in Jesus, the true resurrection power.
I would have to conclude that Masons, either knowingly or unknowingly, are at odds with the authority of God, as expressed in and through Jesus Christ.
[edit on 2-1-2009 by OmegaPoint]
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Are you suggesting that the myth of Isis and Osiris, and Horus, is not employed anywhere in Freemasonry, or that the Eye of Horus isn't used?
And the issue of authority, and of a model of leadership, is always at issue. There is always an ideal to which we must aspire.
Question: What is the object or the definite purposes of Freemasonry, aside from good deeds and all that - is it not enlightenment, and the opening of the third eye, in order to bring the individual into contact with the ineffible mystery of God, and the light of life?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Well what of the writings of Pike referred to earlier in this thread. He clearly believed that Masonry was in fact Religious instruction.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
And don't the 33 degrees correspond in some way with the 33 vertibrae, involving the rising snake of kundalini unto enlightenment ie: opening of the 3rd eye of the Pineal gland. That is what a Worshipful Master of a Lodge told me, as far as the 33 degrees go.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I think it's important to consider that you are a low level mason. Higher level masons I've noticed are not commenting.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Are there not roots of Freemasonry which involve the Egyptian helliocentric religious tradition, as well as the Jewish via the Temple of Soloman?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Also, I was wondering if Masons deny that the quotes attributed to Pike earlier in this thread are authentic..?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
So I am entirely mistaken to think that the ancient roots of Masonry can be traced back to the flood and the Tower of Babel? That the sons of Noah, who founded Egypt, are not considered the forerunners of the craft
- or for that matter that Freemasonry is based on a duality of good and evil, what some might consider the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Framing and context is everything, as I'm sure you and your Bretheren can appreciate and understand, and so I refer you back to my first post in this thread regarding the fundamental problem of a certain confusion with respect to the issue of a universal controversy involving spiritual authority, as evidenced or manifested athrough the Exodus from Egypt, and then again vias the entry of Christ through that Jewish framework. So to begin with, I am attempting to b ring to awareness the demarcation point and point of differentiation from the Egyptian Isis, Osiris, Horus, Seth tradition, to the Temple of Soloman, who's lines do not intersect.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I just don't think when we're dealing in such weighty matters that the issue of salvation, and self forgiveness can be avoided, and the central crux of my thesis would be simply this. We cannot engineer our own salvation. We cannot "get in" via the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, which ends in a paradox, and it would seem in many cases, an inversion, and perhaps even a hijacking of spiritual authority, where the creature (in this case sacred geometrical infrastructure) becomes the object and not the Creator.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
How do you know that the Architect, at the apex of your philosophical stucture, isn't an imposter?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
The "Great Work" or the Magnum Opus, or the ages, was the work of Christ on the cross. His eye was single, his whole body was filled with light, and he maintained his intergrity through death as a meaningful suffering, and in so doing, nullified it, and replaced it, as the resurrection and the everylasting life, the truth, the reality, and the light of life.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Within the meaningful contextual framework of the Temple of Soloman, how can Jesus be bypassed as an authentic model of Civilized Leadership, both individually and globally, in favour of something decidedly Egyptian, and Babylonion in orientation.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Why are so many Masons here on this board of all places, simply to debunk so-called anti-Masons? I don't think so. I think it's because you would like to find out more about the things that you intuitively know you are a part of.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I'm a seeker of truth also. And I'm not anti-Mason, just Christian, but a Christian of a wholly rataional kind.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I would never discard Christ to take on a cloak placed upon me by someone without His Authority, bottom line. I fear for Masons. God loves Masons too.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
You can call me crazy if you like, but somewhere deep within, maybe even locaated in the Pineal Gland of all places, there is a throneroom, a great palace if you will. And yes, there is a great struggle to get to the light, and be illuminated by it, I understand that, been there done that got the t-shirt as they say, and when you come up against the greatest mysteries, you hit a point where it CAN become VERY confusing.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
For me, from my point of view or perspective, it is VITALLY important, that the seat of the soul, the rider of my horse (there's always a bit in the mouth), is the actual living spirit of God, and that I am not getting beat in the process of working through a series of puzzles, where the dealer could very well be dealing a rigged game, if you know what I mean. Our throne is to be occupied by only ONE God, and he is not dualistic, or God would be a house divided - do you see where I'm coming from?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
And so I take a good look at Christ, his character, his model, his great work, and there I just KNOW that I'm safe, not because "they" told me so, but because it's the only rational way to approach the underlying problem of the duality of good and evil. In Him the paradox is resolved, the simplicity on the other side of complexity revealed, and it's a place of peace, and everlasting protection, as well as a type of cosmic clamshell of a spiritual transformation, and there is no controversy, and no attack made, or which is possible, therein.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I strongly suspect that Masons place themselves unknowingly in GRAVE jeopardy, and that they should look at Pike, Crowley, others, and their writings, as an indicator at what happens to people at yes, the "higher levels".
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
We are all after the same prescious jewel of truth I suspect - and mine is a perfect gentleman. In Christ I know I have the right God entering the tabernacle of my temple, and the light of life who knows me at the very deepest levels through and through, and right across the entire spectrum of all being and becoming.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
My true motive is I am fearful for you, because like Jesus I love you.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I would never discard Christ to take on a cloak placed upon me by someone without His Authority, bottom line. I fear for Masons. God loves Masons too.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Well, I did a little checking and you say there is no ancient history of freemasonry right, but what about this?
"I would however like to see each district introduce their own one-day seminar, with emphasis on running a lodge and not necessarily focussing on the ancient history of Freemasonry."
Isn't that odd?
First, a bit of history. Records strongly suggest a lineage to operative stonemasons' lodges or guilds of fourteenth century Scotland and an inner fraternity of the London Company of Masons. The records of the Lodge of Edinburgh (Mary’s Chapel) show lawyer and writer, John Boswell of Auchinleck, signing the minutes of a meeting held in 1600, although the first recorded admission of a non-operative doesn't occur until 1634. The oldest surviving Minute Book, that of the Lodge of Aitchison’s Haven, is dated 9th January 1598.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Something else - an old friend of mine who once almost dated Robert Chad, the founder of a company in Canada called Husky Injection Moulding and a Mason, was at his house and when she opened a closet, found a large goats head type baphomet type headress (hat) with horns, and bolted from his house it creeped her out so much.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Isn't the worshipful master considered the "light" of the lodge situated with his back to the rising sun? And is there not a part in one of the initiation rites which, mimicking what the voice from heaven is purported to have uttered at the baptism of Jesus Christ - "this is my son in whom I am well pleased"?
Originally posted by Ralph_The_Wonder_Llama
Well, according to David Icke and other legally-retarded, oxygen-wasting individuals, Freemasons don't learn of the evil agenda of the Brotherhood until they receive the 33rd degree, where they make an oath with Satan and are inducted into the Illuminati where they will plot to take over the world.
Here are some excerpts from the 33rd degree, which were taken from an anti-Masonic site:
"
GRAND COMMANDER: Maintain your honor to your Fatherland. Be prepared to die to defend its rights. Labor for the peoples to move securely a lawful freedom, but do not flatter it and do not fear to tell useful truths; never seek frivolous popularity.
Take of yourself the trouble to instruct the people, to enlighten them, to better them, without ever threatening or to try to lead them astray, or to make them serve you as an instrument.
Never give support to any actions of unfaithfulness to the nation, do not support evil, defend no errors, do not keep the truth hidden in avail for someone or for special interests; consider yourself as a defender of public morality. Contemplate the tyrant and the people's demagogue as evenly contemptuous of the freedom of conscience. May your motto in the future as citizenship be; Freedom with order, Equality with honor for the lawful authority, Brotherhood with justice.
Do you promise yourself conduct honor with uprightness as a citizen for continuing in the agreement to be done with these rules and the obligations to be acknowledged, that they put upon you necessary?
CANDIDATE: This I promise.
www.gaiaguys.net...
Edit: Copy and paste removed, link added.
Please review this on posting material written by others:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 12-1-2006 by intrepid]
[edit on 12-1-2006 by Ralph_The_Wonder_Llama]
I suggest that you don't edit my edit again.
[edit on 12-1-2006 by intrepid]