It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Archon, I have no intention of stifling debate, however, I have noticed a large number of "newbies" that have registered and have zeroed in on that particular thread lately. I suspect that is is in related to the other issues that have come up lately related to that thread.
I don't think that you appreciate the fact that the greatest strength of ATS is the wide variety of opinions and viewpoints that are represented here. Unlike other boards where dissenters are actively discouraged or banned just because of their ideas, the only thing that will get you banned here is to flout the TOS (usually through openly abusive posts). This is what makes ATS the fantasitc board that it is today
Originally posted by Archon
I'm outta here. I never came here to kiss anyones ass.
ah thank you for clearing that up for me. that movie sums up the pentagon stuff really well I think. but, I think there needs to be another half. In my opinion 2 sides of the pentagon plane issure should be the ats thread about how a plane did hit the pentagon and the other half disclaming the debuffs of the situation. for #2 atleast
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
People... this is in Boad Questions & Business...
Please refrain from discussing the issues of 9/11 in this thread. There are other much more appropriate threads for that.
Keep this thread focused on the initiative to create five well-focused threads on specific attributes of the 9/11 Pentagon attack.
I'll be getting back to everyone's u2u's by Monday, and will kick things off with a special podcast.
Also, if we have two members (or two equal teams) that would like to engage in a Podcast Debate on this subject, please send me a U2U. That would be an interesting companion to this effort.
Originally posted by Majic
If a member is “brand-spankin' new” and joined specifically to participate, however, I imagine the staff might be willing to consider external references in lieu of ATS experience, although I don't speak for them and they may have good reasons not to do so.
Originally posted by SkepticalOverlord
It's our goal to work hard to make this a truly objective examination of all available evidence in a collaborative and productive way.
Originally posted by SkepticalOverlord
These "AboveTopSecret.com COINTELPRO" rumors tend to center around…CatHerder's analysis of the 757 at the Pentagon…
Because that one post debunks a popular conspiracy theory…
Originally posted by bsbray11
Now I'm not completely sure a 757 did or did not hit the Pentagon or whatever, but I really want to believe that this thing is going to be totally fair and that's going to be very hard to achieve and maintain
Just trying to keep a little perspective on a thing or two. And hopefully we'll get to the WTC later.
Originally posted by ultralo1
Skeptic overlord,
Sign me up for the 757 Did hit the pentigon team. I dont have 20 post so I could not U2U. I am fairly new and I usually dont have much to offer in the discussions but on this one I do. 1, two eyewitness accounts one from inside the pentigon and one is a medic who responded after seeing the explosion. 2, Common sense Aluminum versus concrete I know which one will win. 3, those incredible piloting manuvers, Ever seen a car chase where the bad guy gets away? He has never had traing to drive like that He is not a professional so how can they do that, Simple What does he have to lose? Also how many people have been taught what you cannot do. Example dont rev the engine above the red line it will blow up, well not really but it does dammage the engine every time you do it and the posibility of the engine blowing up is increased. Get my point? I can give other examples if need be. And another thing about flying close to the ground at high speeds, There is an air effect that creates a cushion of stable air under the plane. The Russians exploited this effect and greated a stubb wing aircraft that flew 20- 50 feet off of the surface and was the size of an air liner. You have to fight with the air craft to get it to go down threw the cushion of air and get close to the ground when you are at speed.
[edit on 11-1-2006 by ultralo1]
Originally posted by ultralo1
Skeptic overlord,
Sign me up for the 757 Did hit the pentigon team. I dont have 20 post so I could not U2U. I am fairly new and I usually dont have much to offer in the discussions but on this one I do. 1, two eyewitness accounts one from inside the pentigon and one is a medic who responded after seeing the explosion. 2, Common sense Aluminum versus concrete I know which one will win. 3, those incredible piloting manuvers, Ever seen a car chase where the bad guy gets away? He has never had traing to drive like that He is not a professional so how can they do that, Simple What does he have to lose? Also how many people have been taught what you cannot do. Example dont rev the engine above the red line it will blow up, well not really but it does dammage the engine every time you do it and the posibility of the engine blowing up is increased. Get my point? I can give other examples if need be. And another thing about flying close to the ground at high speeds, There is an air effect that creates a cushion of stable air under the plane. The Russians exploited this effect and greated a stubb wing aircraft that flew 20- 50 feet off of the surface and was the size of an air liner. You have to fight with the air craft to get it to go down threw the cushion of air and get close to the ground when you are at speed. Thankfully it never made it to production. I will Give links latter.So Can I please Please Please be part of the team OH Great and All Knowing OZ, I mean Skeptic Overlord.
[edit on 11-1-2006 by ultralo1]
Text
Originally posted by ultralo1 hey it is not of a matter of what will win titanium and harden steel the engin are made of and all that aluminum just don't disapears. besides there should been atleast three hole instead of only one of 16 feet. the engines are 9 feet on there owen then the body of the plain. I think you need to rethink your thoughts.
Skeptic overlord,
Sign me up for the 757 Did hit the pentigon team. I dont have 20 post so I could not U2U. I am fairly new and I usually dont have much to offer in the discussions but on this one I do. 1, two eyewitness accounts one from inside the pentigon and one is a medic who responded after seeing the explosion. 2, Common sense Aluminum versus concrete I know which one will win. 3, those incredible piloting manuvers, Ever seen a car chase where the bad guy gets away? He has never had traing to drive like that He is not a professional so how can they do that, Simple What does he have to lose? Also how many people have been taught what you cannot do. Example dont rev the engine above the red line it will blow up, well not really but it does dammage the engine every time you do it and the posibility of the engine blowing up is increased. Get my point? I can give other examples if need be. And another thing about flying close to the ground at high speeds, There is an air effect that creates a cushion of stable air under the plane. The Russians exploited this effect and greated a stubb wing aircraft that flew 20- 50 feet off of the surface and was the size of an air liner. You have to fight with the air craft to get it to go down threw the cushion of air and get close to the ground when you are at speed. Thankfully it never made it to production. I will Give links latter.So Can I please Please Please be part of the team OH Great and All Knowing OZ, I mean Skeptic Overlord.
[edit on 11-1-2006 by ultralo1]