It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

GIZA and the truth??

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 10:00 PM
link   
My theory is that the Giza plateau Was first developed by KHUFU and his son RADJEDE (DJEDEFRE) at the beginning 2606 B.C. and further developed on by his son RADJEDE from (2583-2575?) his date of death is in dispute.
After much research I have found a couple of clues that his signature is in the layout of the Giza Plateau. On my site

home.comcast.net...
i have put some of my pictures so that you all can see what I'm talking about, after much development of the pictures you start to see a layout that represents RA with 3 disks, all so you see the detail of a road that looks like a snake which is URAEUS.
All so RADJEDE is very much into the occult which can be viewed at

mmothra.blogspot.com...

RADJEDE should be his own topic just based on his ideas.
You all can check the symbols at the site that i went to to see what i mean by the 3 disks and the snake.

members.aol.com...

[edit on 8-1-2006 by cmaracing]

[edit on 9-1-2006 by cmaracing]




posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 10:28 PM
link   
The pyramids at Giza are a layout of the three stars in orions belt....

www.kolumbus.fi...

www.catchpenny.org...

www.grahamhancock.com...

Check it out!


-- Boat



posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 10:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by cmaracing
My theory is that the Giza plateau Was first developed by KHUFU


What makes you think Khufu built the pyramids??

-- Boat



posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 10:36 PM
link   
Khufu is associated with the pyramid but died and is buried somewhere else and his son continued the rest based on the information about
Radjedef he was a different thinker and studied the occult in depth.



posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 10:38 PM
link   
if you look at the disks they are in a different place than on the site you gave me



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 05:36 AM
link   
Do you mind to elaborate what kind of tools have they used to carve the stones, and what kind of tools they used to level ground? Do you know how much difference in ground level is in Giza plateau and how big is difference in level in great pyramid?



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 05:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by cmaracing
Khufu is associated with the pyramid but died and is buried somewhere else and his son continued the rest based on the information about
Radjedef he was a different thinker and studied the occult in depth.


I disagree, the lastest evidence points to the fact that Khufu did not build the pyramids; they were instead built around 10, 500 BC.

-- Boat



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 08:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Boatphone
I disagree, the lastest evidence points to the fact that Khufu did not build the pyramids; they were instead built around 10, 500 BC.
-- Boat


What evidence?

Don't get the Pyramids and Sphinx confused...



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 09:50 AM
link   
There is some evidence that in time of Khufu there was some work done on Pyramid, but it is not clear if he is the one that has built pyramid.

For all we can tell, he might have built it or just repair it.

But if he started the work, and his son finished it, as suggested above, why there is no single evidence in pyramid it self about it?

Also there is a problem of material used to build it and tools used in the time of Khufu.


[edit on 1/9/06 by vietifulJoe]



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 10:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by vietifulJoe
Also there is a problem of material used to build it and tools used in the time of Khufu.


It's not as hard as you would expect, when you look into the research. Here is an overview.



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 04:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Boatphone
I disagree, the lastest evidence points to the fact that Khufu did not build the pyramids; they were instead built around 10, 500 BC.
-- Boat

Boat,
There is no such evidence.

Harte



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 05:01 PM
link   
Boat are you saying that the pyramids were built in 10,500 B.C. , as in nearly twleve thousand years ago? Man was barely developed enough to move out of his nomadic stages much less build engineering feats such as the pyramids. There is clearly no evidence that suppourts your statement.



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 06:07 PM
link   
Based on the images that i have on my site you start to see that many factors are included in the layout of the Giza area, if you noticed that much of the planing that is in the area of Giza is taken in to consideration of a layout that was intended to tell a story or a signature. KHUFU and his son RADJEDE (DJEDEFRE) had developed a large layout for Giza including much of the introduction of the occult into Egypt as seen at the site attached: mmothra.blogspot.com...
All so if noticed at the site you will see how huge the planing was, check out the pictures at this site: home.comcast.net... including many identifiers such as the 3 disks that represent RA,
and all so the road that looks like a snake which is URAEUS both that are symbols of (RA)DJEDE.



posted on Jan, 10 2006 @ 03:51 AM
link   
cmaracing,
if you like to have a discussion on this, you first have to answer question above. For example, why there is no single sign in pyramid of Khufu or his son? What tools did they use to built pyramids and to level the ground?



posted on Jan, 10 2006 @ 04:31 PM
link   
VietifulJoe have you gone to the sites mentioned above in this string and look at some the pictures and read what i have written i do not know how they where built but that there is a math improbability involved with the set up of giza.



posted on Jan, 11 2006 @ 02:19 PM
link   
How is that there are many artifacts with markings of Khufu, yet the three pyramids don't have one single marking on the inside? Seems that he liked his name associated with things he built. Wouldn't he have wanted his name associated with one of the greatest structures ever? If he did build it/them - what were they for? From what I have read, no mummies were ever found inside - so they weren't used as tombs as commonly claimed.



posted on Jan, 11 2006 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by UnMature
Boat are you saying that the pyramids were built in 10,500 B.C. , as in nearly twleve thousand years ago? Man was barely developed enough to move out of his nomadic stages much less build engineering feats such as the pyramids. There is clearly no evidence that suppourts your statement.


Incorrect. There is a good deal of evidence for this. The Sphinx has indisputable signs of water erosion. Water erosion from heavy rains. The problem is that one must go far back in time to find these kinds of heavy rains in Egypt, at least, to 10, 000 BC.

This means that the Sphinx could not have been built before 10, 500 BC. This also means that there was a advanced society living in that area of Egypt at the time.

The pyramids and the Sphinx together form a "map" or "lay out" of the skys over Giza, Egypt in 10, 000 BC. This not only helps point us to the structures being built at that time, but also it tells us that who ever built the Sphinx also built or planned the pyramids.



-- Boat



posted on Jan, 11 2006 @ 04:43 PM
link   
Boatphone, again show me the study which says that not your opinion because I have a study, the one you are probably using and it gives a different date to what you are saying. It is an author that says it was 10,500BC and not the Boston Study.



posted on Jan, 11 2006 @ 05:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Odium
Boatphone, again show me the study which says that not your opinion because I have a study, the one you are probably using and it gives a different date to what you are saying. It is an author that says it was 10,500BC and not the Boston Study.


I did say 10,500BC.

-- Boat



posted on Jan, 11 2006 @ 05:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Boatphone

Originally posted by Odium
Boatphone, again show me the study which says that not your opinion because I have a study, the one you are probably using and it gives a different date to what you are saying. It is an author that says it was 10,500BC and not the Boston Study.


I did say 10,500BC.

-- Boat


I know you did.

Which study do you use to back this up though?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join