It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

View footage of 2nd JFK shooter here

page: 4
1
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2006 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Hi all. first post here

just to weigh in on the debate.

First off, even Lenny Bruce, way back, made the point that Jackie was clearly (and rightfully, in his view) trying get the hell away from the area - by climbing off the seat and onto the back of the car - and it was misrepresented as being 'an attempt to call the agent' - because that's what Good People do. Meantime, its just not true.

Next, with the stabilised version of the Zapruder film, there're a number of oddities that seem to emerge - the most overt one is this - and I assume
folks have no doubt run across the 'Zapruder film hoax' concept, and it bears looking at again - with this 'normalised' image. One of the most jarring things to me that becomes instantly visible and does lend some credence to the idea that perhaps the Zapruder film is indeed a composite of some kind:

run the film, and simply pay attention to the overall 'movement' of everyone in the car. Forget about what's unfolding, just look at the body movements of everyone. Spool the film back and forth, purely watching the movements.

It becomes rapidly apparent that - at the moment where allegedly the car is supposedly 'speeding up' - everyone in the car jerks forward, exactly as if they would, if the brakes had been hit.
BUT the car 'appears' to be speeding up. This simply isn't possible.
(Ever try jerking forward with most of your body, in a car thats rapidly accelerating? G forces push you back. Yet everyone in this car, jerks forward at the moment its supposedly 'speeding up to get away'. ) Exactly as if the car interior is showing a scene where 'the brakes have been hit' and the people are reacting accordingly.
This anomaly - in combo with a lot of witnesses describing a scene of the car slowing down almost to a halt during the shooting - which ISN'T reflected in the apparently 'real' Zapruder film, does make me wonder..
And its no good saying 'well everyone is 'flinching' from the sound - the shooting's over, and all the body movements are showing people jerking forward at the same time, as a car's brakes are hit.. even though the visual overall shows 'a car speeding up and away'..

You might also want to look at the abrupt synchronised way that the Govenor and his wife 'fold up' and lie down so perfectly..

that's my two cents worth..




posted on Feb, 12 2006 @ 11:32 AM
link   
I was of the understanding that the fatal shot came from the sewer using an exploding bullet,which would make sence as the shots tragectory was at an upward angle,and as far as a get away what a perfect way to go undetected,happens to be where the limo stopped as well,of all the theorys that makes the most sence to me,if it were from grassy knoll bullet would have been at a downward angle



posted on Feb, 25 2006 @ 12:03 AM
link   
hello,

i found this board the other day while researching some of the 9/11 facts that have never really made it to the general public (mainly the explosions on the lower levels of both towers, and how the steel in the basements had melted...and how the debris was destroyed without any sort of real investigation). (edit: i started doing all this research after seeing the 9/11 eyewitness video on google a few weeks ago...incredible footage i must say)

so then i stumbled upon this this particular jfk thread, and i noticed there were some questions regarding the jfk autopsy photos / documents, and why they seemed out of place from what you've seen on the zapruder film. some of you might not realize that jfk's body was "stolen" a few times between the dallas hospital and the flight to the official autopsy.
if you were already aware of this fact, i apologize...i was reading through the posts in this thread very quickly.

anyhow, here's a video uploaded on google that has details on how jfk's body was switched (with eyewitness testimony from the people who handled jfk's body). the first 40 minutes of the film focuses solely on the coverup...and the next 50 minutes connects bush sr. as a key player in the CIA coverup. the makers of the video convinced me...assuming the facts presented do indeed check out. am i out of my mind for believing them?

video: video.google.com...

--noto
--college student in california.

[edit on 25-2-2006 by noto]

[edit on 25-2-2006 by noto]



posted on Feb, 25 2006 @ 02:46 AM
link   
Greetings-

Just thought I'd throw some ideas around on this topic. First off I truly believe the shooting of JFK was a downright conspiracy. And I do believe the Govt. and the mob were involved together to pull this off. As I watched the Zapruder film the other day I got to thinking. If this was a planned lynching, then the entire event had to be worked out, meaning the minute Kennedy got off the plane in Dallas he had to be strategically placed in the limo so ALL of the snipers had at least one good shot at Kennedy. Sure Oswald could probably have picked him off from anywhere inside the limo, but they wanted to make sure Kennedy died on this day, so they wanted to make sure all the snipers had a good shot at him, including the fatal head shot, which came from either the Grassy knoll or more likely from the sewer. So is it possible that someone who greeted Kennedy as he got off the plane and seated him into the limo knew what the plan was that day? Just a thought, there might be a connection or it might just be completely ironic. Any ideas are welcome!

Matt



posted on Feb, 25 2006 @ 03:19 AM
link   
Who will ever know? with review you can see that many of the videos/pictures occuring on the day seem to be fake. with NO eye witnesses at this time alive or willing to testify to a camera about the truth that happend that day we will never know. my opinion is that the fatal shot came from infront of kennedy at the time, could be the driver, could be the grassy knoll, could be from the sewer, all i know is that the CIA did a GREAT job of covering up their tracks/witnesses/evidence. but i gotta give it to ya, you cats at ATS are slick and have caught a lot of mistakes in the films and conspiracies, im sticking to this thread and a couple other JFK threads on this site to see what new news pops up over time, good job to everyone hear at ATS that keeps posting new information, lovin it!!



posted on Feb, 25 2006 @ 03:53 AM
link   
that NIX film has gotta be fake. don't know if anyone's noticed it but just after JFK is shot you can see the front of the car behind it. the drivers head seems to go straight through the windscreen for a second.



posted on Feb, 27 2006 @ 03:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Val

You can download the Nix film from here, it also has the Muchmoore film as well...

www.jfkjr.com...



thanks for the link



posted on Mar, 1 2006 @ 08:53 PM
link   
Heres a few things to think on when talking about the JKF conspiracy.


-Sewer shot = IMPOSSIBLE
+There were a total of 2 storm drains.(3 today)
+Both storm drains had no angle to even see the president. The third, which wasnt put in until 20 years later, would have put the shooter in the wide open where all of the railroad workers could have seen him. Not to mention he would have about .5 seconds to even get a glimpse of the president, trees were obstructing that view.
-Magic Bullet Theory = HARD TO CONCLUDE
+The route that the bullet took was a very odd one, shown in many films to
turn in mid air, they never seem to mention that there are several things in the human body that can cause a bullet to change its course.
+The problem came when the police showed the bullet, it looked as if it had never been used. Not a single scratch on the bullet. The police also found this bullet lying on the Governors stretcher, not in him. That is where the second problem comes from, not many bullets just fall out of your thigh.
-Impossible physical action from the President
+He appears to lurch forward when hit from the front, this is a trick played by the film itself. If you compare his position to something in the car you can easily see he is actually forced backward and then collapses into his wives lap.
-Impossible "Head Turns" from people in the car
+Again, this isn't a Sony Digicam...its one of the first color cameras to come out, the film quality itself isn't very good at all. If you look at other old home videos people do appear to move rather jittery at times, ESPECIALLY at far distances.


I could go on forever, I got most of my info from movies and articles on the internet...I really don't have a side on this matter however. If it was planned they did a good job of it. If it wasn't planned, and a crazed Communist with a $20 gun did shoot the President in the back of the neck and head from the 6th floor of the building, and then get downstairs to meet a cop, then walk 5 miles to shoot a cop, then be found in a movie theater and killed the next day...well that was just a crazy day now wasn't it?




posted on Mar, 2 2006 @ 02:31 PM
link   
I watched a documentry this morning on discovery science ,sorry i cant recall what it was called ,but it focussed on the differant photographers around the Plaza that day.

They recreated all of the photographers fields of view and equipment and the problem with the Nix film is that he loaded his camera with the wrong film he used film for indoor use in his camera and didn't correct the filter which could have alieviated the problem.

When they recreated nix they placed a guy near the grassy knoll and he was indistinguisable in the resulting film but when they tried again using the correct film a figure was visable and even more so with a more advanced period camera.

It also pointed out that if Zapruder had carried on filming just a little longer he could have had a very clear view of the grassy knoll.

basicly the programme looked at the exhasberating fact that the areas where the gunman/men were supposed to have been were either filmed for a time like the window at the depositry only to have the camera person move his /her field of view at critiacal moments.

I also have to mention the fact that in this programme didn't show the gunman from the film mentioned at the start of this thread.

Sorry if this is old news to you hardend Jfk conspiricy types but i just thought id share



posted on Mar, 2 2006 @ 11:01 PM
link   

-Magic Bullet Theory = HARD TO CONCLUDE
+The route that the bullet took was a very odd one, shown in many films to
turn in mid air, they never seem to mention that there are several things in the human body that can cause a bullet to change its course.
+The problem came when the police showed the bullet, it looked as if it had never been used. Not a single scratch on the bullet. The police also found this bullet lying on the Governors stretcher, not in him. That is where the second problem comes from, not many bullets just fall out of your thigh.


Actually it was just the other night a guy did just exactly that. It was a show on History or Discovery. They used some kind of gel and animal bones to make the targets and set up the scene just like the assasination. They mimicked the scene the best they could. The only difference is the round landed on the govs thigh instead of penetrating. Other than that, all the same wounds and the round was almost undamaged.


If it wasn't planned, and a crazed Communist with a $20 gun did shoot the President in the back of the neck and head from the 6th floor of the building, and then get downstairs to meet a cop, then walk 5 miles to shoot a cop, then be found in a movie theater and killed the next day...well that was just a crazy day now wasn't it?


Not all that strange. There's been far stranger happenings. Folks act like you gotta be a genious to load, aim and fire a rifle. Actually it would be far easier for one guy to assasinate the President than a team. A 5, 10 or 15 man team, the logistics alone would be a nightmare. Think about it. If I wanted to assasinate the President, I would hire one guy, not 3 or 4 or 5 or 6.... that's just that many more people that could rat me out. If he gets nabbed, that's only one guy I have to worry about. Always the fewer involved the better chance of success.



posted on Mar, 13 2006 @ 06:01 PM
link   
ichi_and_scratchy - Gotta agree with almost everything you said.

The thing is, when will it all come out? Will people every agree "Yes, it's a fact, so and so happened" or will it be left in mystery for ever? I think the people and family close to him deserve to know.



posted on May, 19 2008 @ 11:28 PM
link   
this website #ing sux dick doesnt work worth a #



posted on Dec, 8 2008 @ 12:00 AM
link   
reply to post by wang
 
HOWDY; DON'T YOU THINK IF ANYONE HAD A BETTER PHOTO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE SOLD IT SINCE NOV 22 l963? I was there in l969 and believe that JFk was shot from the front...check out the tie he was wearing and see the nick in the knot in the tie..........
there is no other photo.....wish there was



posted on Dec, 13 2009 @ 01:01 PM
link   
I'm new to the site. I read through a lot of the posts. Here's some thoughts.

1) I have never seen or heard of a human body moving toward a shooter. Human bodies, head shots included, ALWAYS move away from the shooter. Ask a trained sniper.

2) The official autopsy report signed by JFK's personal physician places the back wound at the 3rd thoracic vertebra. Well down from the neck. There is also testimony that Humes probed this wound and found it to be at a 45 degree downward angle and he hit the end of the wound with his finger tip.

3) The parkland doctor who performed the trach said he used a small wound in the throat and expanded it. He also said the autopsy photo of the wound did not depict the trach wound he made.

4) The first Discovery show, Beyond the Magic Bullet, shows the two ballistic dummys about 10" different in height. Films of 11/22/63 show JFK and Connelly almost even at the shoulder. The show depicts the shot entering high in the shoulder/neck region, and exiting the sternum area. Stop right there. This does not support the Warren Commission report.

5) The second Discovery show, Target Car, shows two things. One the Grassy Knoll shot would have left a wound in the left side of JFK's skull. No wound. Shot didn't hit JFK. Two it shows that the fatal head shot from the rear would have killed the driver.

6) All the Doctors and trained Technicians who witnessed JFK's wounds at Parkland and Bethesda who describe a "gaping wound to the back of the head" were apparently mistaken according to the Warren Commission.

7) Gerald Ford, a WC commissioner admitted to having the back wound moved to the neck/shoulder junction.

8) It is documented that the WC "adjusted" more than one time line to fit it's conclusions.

9) No one has placed Oswald in the 6th floor window at 12:30 on 11/22/63. All evidence is probative, not conclusive. All evidence that Oswald shot Tippet is also probative, not conclusive.

Let me know what you think after you do some research on line. Ballistic Findings from JFK Autopsy is really good.

Thanks



posted on Jan, 20 2010 @ 04:29 PM
link   
No gunshot wounds were fired from the fence. It was a red herring or a dummie shot to create a distraction for the driver who actually fired the fatal shot at 313.







 
1
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join