It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Scout1959
Very mature to ignore those that don't agree with you.......... too bad you can't just ignore the Terrorists.............. course you could but they'd still kill you just as dead..............
Oh well......... small deeds for small people........
A.5. Transparency Visits and Discussions
16. On 1 November 2005, following a meeting held on 30 October 2005 between Mr. Larijani, the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran, and the Deputy Director General for Safeguards (DDG-SG), the Agency was given access to the buildings requested within the area of interest at Parchin (see para. 41 of GOV/2005/67), in the course of which environmental samples were taken. The Agency did not observe any unusual activities in the buildings visited. Its final assessment is pending the results of the environmental sample analysis. There have been no new developments with regard to questions and access related to the Lavisan-Shian site (see paras 37–40 of GOV/2005/67).
B. Current overall assessment
20. In the September 2005 report to the Board of Governors, it was noted that, in light of the difficulty of establishing a definitive conclusion with respect to all of the contamination, it was important to make progress on the issue of the scope and chronology of Iran’s P-1 and P-2 programmes (see paras 44–47 of GOV/2005/67). Since that time, Iran has been more forthcoming in providing access to additional documentation related to the 1987 offer and permitting interviews with individuals who had been involved in discussions with the procurement network. However, there still remain issues to be resolved in connection with the genesis of the mid-1990s offer. The Agency is still seeking additional assurance that no P-2 programme was conducted between 1995 and 2002. The Agency is currently reviewing the new information provided by Iran on the P-1 and P-2 enrichment programmes and has emphasized to Iran the importance of providing the additional requested
But for every Muslim fanatic there is an equally dangerous Jewish or Christian nutjob
Originally posted by pavil
There hasn't been an attack in the last few years by Jewish or Christian nutjobs that have killed thousands of civilians in a day in a non combat situation.
I think the Muslim "nutjob" is more dangerous than the Jewish or Christian one.
Originally posted by pavil
We don't have Jewish or Christian leaders of nation's threatening to "wipe" a nation off the map.
I here by challenge you to provide evidence that proves the Iranian government are seeking nuclear weapons.
The computer contained studies for crucial features of a nuclear warhead, said European and American officials who had examined the material, including a telltale sphere of detonators to trigger an atomic explosion. The documents specified a blast roughly 2,000 feet above a target - considered a prime altitude for a nuclear detonation.
There havent been any attacks from Islamic nutjobs that have killed thousands of civilians in one day either.
Iran hands over black market documents reputedly linked to nuclear bomb
VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Iran has passed on to the International Atomic Energy Agency sensitive documents acquired on the black market that seem linked to nuclear warhead design, diplomats said Tuesday.
Iran already has the bomb
Rafi Eitan suspects that Iran already has enough enriched uranium fissionable material to manufacture at least one or two atom bombs of the Hiroshima type. "Otherwise Iranian President Ahmadinejad would not have dared come out with his declaration that Israel should be wiped off the map," repeating it in various versions. His efforts at denying the Holocaust in which six million Jews were slaughtered prove that there is method in Ahmadinejad's madness. "Don't treat him like a madman," Chief of General Staff Dan Halutz recently cautioned.
Iran warns of diplomacy end
IRAN warned today that the referral of a long-running dispute over its nuclear program to the UN Security Council will bring "an end to diplomacy,"...
Originally posted by fritz
No Regenmacher, that's not checkmate.
That is a Ground Burst test in the Nevada desert.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Repeat: That image has been around for over half a century, and I was just using it for a graphical illustration.
Here's some more:
I know what the photo is, since I browsed for the image and posted it.
It is NOT a literal example of current events, it is a metaphorical example.
The nuclear blast image was to emphasize these news articles, read them:
A high-risk game of nuclear chicken -Jan 31, 2006
CONPLAN 8022 - tactical nuclear strikes
I use images for demonstration purposes, as in making a point through graphical emphasis.
The point was a nuclear strike by the US on Iran is a possible checkmate, verstehen?
Now I need a drink, it's 7:30am and I don't drink.....
[edit on 31-1-2006 by Regenmacher]
Originally posted by digitalassassin
In an effort to bring new pressure in the hours before Tehran takes what could be a fateful step, the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China were working on a statement opposing the Iranian move and urging that Tehran return to negotiations.
Is this going to happen? Are we preparing for a Nuclear war with Iran? Everyone has pretty much pointed to Iran as a threat to World Peace. But is the use of nuclear weapons required? How will this whole thing play out?
[edit on 7-1-2006 by digitalassassin]