Trickz, frankly I havent researched Mars surface anomalies for a few reasons. First, there are just so many moon anomalies. Two, I would assume NASA at this point is more skilled in removing anomalies post proccesing. Most of the moon ones are from pre 80's all the way back to the 50's.

Which isnt to say I don't know of alot of Mars anomalies. As to the perplexing face. Frankly, it could be a rock. I live here in Phoenix and our mesa's and rock formations look amazingly like things. The part I find unusall is how nicely timed the rock slide was when we reimaged.

All the other rock and so called pyramids around the area fine except for the face. Who knows... I think the moon would be a better indicator of life its so close and they say If you want to hide something put it in sight.

As to NASA withholding things. Why for any reason would NASA have a) the right to hold back images of celestial objects b) hold back images of celestial objects? As to it being a time constraint of assembeling topographial information b.s. They are NASA, they have more advanced topography analyzers and software than the US Army. But! Yes there could be slight problems with the images that give the illusion of something there anything is possible, but ALL of these anomalies are the result of error? The same anomalie in different images captured at a different time? The Shard is a photo anomalie? The Castle? Where there is smoke.

Originally posted by StarfleetCommand
Hey guys, I appreciate all of the votes and praise.

EsoTeach, not sure what you are getting at? In regards to our moon it does not spin on its axis; hence darkside of the moon.

Ya, my rhetoric was a little difficult to decipher. Let me say it another way:

I was curious if it is unique or against the odds that we do not observe the entire surface of our moon from Earth, and if we were to be observing the moons of other planets from the surface of the planets they revolve around, would we infact be able to see the entire surface of their respective moons as observed from the surface of their planets?


edited to add:

Sometimes when faced with enigmatic and unsubstantiated unequivical proof, we need not give up, but attempt to look for the answers to our questions by asking different questions. I think sometimes we fail to simply ask the right questions. And when we resolve such speculative inquiries, we need to couple those findings with parrallel conflicting known enomilies with our findings to devise a progressive hypothesis, or theory.

[edit on 7-1-2006 by Esoteric Teacher]

arcology row 4822
Thanx Starfleetcommander, you got my vote.I have been looking for the photos Hoagland was talking about for years.Especially interesting is the object rolling uphill.It leaves consistently identical tracks along the whole trail.My guess is a lunar explorer module though from what country or species i cant guess.Fascinating.
Also am i the only one who thinks the meandering gully directly underneath "arcology row" in lunar photo 4822 looks an awful lot like a riverbed?Look at it.....how else but by liquid erosion could it be formed?What the heck is that?

It's imho a given that these artifacts are real, i mean we have some of these on earth, (giza plateau, ultra large structures near ural, won't go into detail, don't need to).

what is so utterly frightening about it all except that the moon (and probably earth, too) was shot up by disruptor fire? why still hide it after ages? i doubt our self-centered civilisation is of interest to anyone, besides with a bit of luck the civilisation that did it might have died out or killed itself by now.

What is it that's apparenly known to those, who some of us call 'the elites', and so utterly and prohibitively dangerous to tell? this is NOT a trivial question, we (offcially) had 42 years of cold war, including the permanent threat of worldwide nuclear annihilation! does it get any better than that? if yes, i would urge you to explore the options.

PS: there's only ONE world conspiracy, this fits neatly in, just like JFK's death (wasn't he the guy who couldn't quit talking about the moon...), anything you wish, it's part of a large picture. look at it, preconceived notions are only distorted reflections of the world.

I just want to clear up the question of whether the moon spins on its axis or not, and whether other moons have similar dynamics. The lunar day (time it takes to spin on its axis) is the same as the lunar year (the amount of time it takes to complete an orbit of the Earth). This is why we always see the same side of the moon from Earth. I don't know for sure, but I am fairly (99%) sure that this is very rare among other moons. In other words, as viewed from their parent planet, you would be able to see more than just the one side of that planets moons as they revolve and orbit around that planet.

Some of the posted pictures are interesting, but most of them could simply be natural formations. The human eye is very good at finding recognizable patterns. Make sure you're not letting what you want to be in the picture determine what you see in the picture. It would be nice if there were structures on the moon, as it would be proof of either aliens that can travel the stars or that humans have advanced technology of which we are unaware, but I see little solid proof in the pictures above.

Originally posted by Musclor
No problem SC, you've done a great job gathering all these pics

Esoteric Teacher, i think the fact that we are seeing always the same side of our satellite is a UNIQUE pattern in our solar system. I'd like to have confirmation from others though.

I thought i would pull up an older thread that has (for me), an unresolved aspect to it. It is also a great thread, i think.

Do other planets' moons show their whole surface to their host planets?

Ok, How idiotic is it of the military website to censor out parts of the lunar surface and NOT expect us to think somethings up? Do they think we really are that dumb? But if were not, then why not boicott (or something) to FORCE them to tell us whats really going on?

I´m so tired of all this censorship its not even funny. Obviously somethings there. Why in the world would they censor it if not? It´s .....ing ridiculous!

Sorry to vent my anger out guys. I had to sign up and be heard. Enough is enough!

But as we all can see, something is going on on the lunar surface. These things aren´t "natural" creations. Perfect squares and a thing rolling UP a hill leaving tracks?!

Great posts, made me think alot and really get upset at the gubment(al)!

Take care!

SS2682

In one of the pictures it says "Strangley obscure"
The image is clearly in the dark. Of course it's obscure.
Well, I've got to hand it to you, you've sure found some crappy pictures to bring about some sort of seedy idea.
Best to run for the hills. The Government will be after you now.
Maybe it's for the best.

Originally posted by Dr Love
A lot of people ask why we stopped going to the moon, I think these pictures could tell the story. We weren't ready for what we found up there and continuing to go back would have created more problems for those wishing to cover-up these structures and anomolies. I think the people would have a hard time grasping this type of discovery. That goes for what I believe to be on Mars as well.

Peace

[edit on 6-1-2006 by Dr Love]

yes you are exactly right. humans only went on the moon one time i believe, and then they stopped. atleast we know why!

atleast we know why!

What...?
You don't KNOW that. By NO means do you know that, and by no means is that a fact.

None of these pictures are the least bit convincing. Stop looking for something that isn't there! Why would NASA go to great lengths to censor moon photos, yet at the same time clumsily forget to censor giant moon structures and other anomalies?