Moon Surface Anomalies [Many Pics], page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 5-1-2006 @ 08:00 PM by StarfleetCommand
So, lets try this again. Here are a few of the moon surface anomlies I find interesting, these are by no means all of them.

The images come from a variety of sources including Apollo and Gemini handheld camers, telescopes, and lunar orbiters.

A large portion of the surface anomalies were discovered by Richard Hoagland (former NASA scientist), and can be ordered from NASA in negative form. As to the explination to some of the anomalies from NASA, they range from "Its a rock", to "We don't know."

Surface Anomalies

The Shard and the Cube Tower

This image is an overexposed 44x enlargement of Lunar Orbiter frame LO-III-84-M. Taken with the medium resolution camera at a distance of at least 250 miles, it shows an object dubbed by Hoagland the "Shard". The star-like object above the "Shard" is a camera registration mark. The "Shard" has a shadow cast in the correct direction for it to be a real object on the Moon and is aligned with the local vertical rather than the grain of the film, decreasing the chance it is an emulsion abnormality. Close-ups reveal a cellular-like internal structure. Above and behind the "Shard" is the "Tower", a massive 7 mile high structure with a central "cube" suspended by a tripod like base. Enhancements of the "Tower" show a similar cellular construction to the "Shard", but with a distinctly hexagonal pattern.










The Castle

This extraordinary object comes from AS10-32-4822, an Apollo hand held Hasselblad photo. The "Castle" is extremely bright and plainly visible at normal magnification, making it nearly impossible for the astronaut taking the picture to have missed it. This UNENHANCED version of it shows the remarkable stacking of it's segments and belies a natural explanation, especially when you consider it is hanging several miles high in the Lunar sky. EM enhancements show a supporting structure, including a drooping cable passing through the tip, like a suspension bridge.


This enigmantic object from frame AS10-32-4822 is literally hanging some seven miles above the Lunar surface. This side by side comparison is from 2 different versions of the same Apollo 10 photographic frame, one obtained by Hoagland and the other by another researcher. In fact, Hoagland has now identified some nine versions of this photo in various archives around the world. Evidently part of "power winder" sequence of photo's taken by the Astronauts, this allows for posititve verification of the reality of this object. Not only does the "Castle" change position relative to the spacecraft - exactly as a real suspended object would - strange, glass-like "panes" evidently pass between the spacecraft and the "Castle". This is strong confirmation of a "glass" dome in the Sinus Medii region of the Moon. Note also in the enhanced image on the right a "cable" passing thru the tip of the "Castle". It droops under the weight of this object, precisely as a real suspension cable would. The unenhanced version on the left corroborates the cellular structure of the "Castle".








Archimedes Platform (contraversial)

The largest lunar mountain range, the Apennines, and the prominent crater Archimedes dominate this part of the Moon close to the prime meridian. It was at the foot of the Apennines, close to Rima Hadley, that the Apollo 15 expedition landed. The object was reported by a Mr. Darling as, platform size 5 miles long, 1 mile wide, Elevation 5,000 ft.





The 12 Mile Long Bridge

It was reported John Glen saw this bridge with his own eyes and reported it to NASA.


Object Moving Up Hill

This is one of the most baffaling images (LunOrb5). This object is imaged moving up hill. This object is 75 feet wide and has left a 900 foot long unusal tread mark, a kind of wobble.


Faces/Art

These just strike me just as coincidence.




Unidentified Structures

















The Glass Structures

A word of note on these. At first when people were investigating these, word was they were obvisouly scratches of some kind. Either they were scratched on the lunar surface or in proccesing/transportation. But as people kept imaging more and more photos with advanced spectral changes, these same scrathes appear over and over in COUNTLESS photos. They also discovered serisous evidence of image cropping done by NASA. Some photos they were able to restore percentages of what was really in the image, some not; this brings me to Astronaut Alan Bean. So people kept analizing the images, and then someone connected what they were seeing with things Alan Bean was painting in his Space Paintings. Note the cropping. They believe its his way of telling us there is something there.





www.lunaranomalies.com...









The Moon Base (Most likely a fake)

The infamous moon base photo. Most likely a fake but I thought I would add it incase no one has seen it. The origin of this photo has not been discovered so take it with a grain of salt.






[edit on 5-1-2006 by StarfleetCommand]

[edit on 5-1-2006 by StarfleetCommand]

[edit on 5-1-2006 by StarfleetCommand]

mod edit: Image Size Guidelines

[edit on 7-1-2006 by sanctum]

[edit on 7-1-2006 by sanctum]


reply posted on 5-1-2006 @ 08:21 PM by picklewalsh
Realy good find!

I realy like the dark side of the moon 'base' pic.



reply posted on 6-1-2006 @ 04:59 PM by StarfleetCommand
Hey guys, I appreciate all of the votes and praise.

EsoTeach, not sure what you are getting at? In regards to our moon it does not spin on its axis; hence darkside of the moon.

True skeptic, could u elaborate about your challenge? As to more anomalies there are hundreds, possibly even thousands. Some anomalies though I chose not to post here for a variety of reasons. Most of them were of unusall shapes, etc that I felt werent up to par of being even remotely something. I am not an expert in topographical analysis though. As to the object moving up hill, one of the astronauts (I cant recall which) said he saw a light moving on the surface and when they imaged it this was the result. It looks like a rock, but how in the hell is it moving up that hill. The track pattern indicates either that A) Its not spheroid or B) Its changing directions slightly. I mean wtf on this one.

Lazarus, the smudges have always been used as proof that NASA has covered things. In the end though its just not really worth anything because of the nature of pixels, pixel degridation(sp), and the current technology. Thats of course in my opinon. I could be wrong. As to the question why would nasa release these photos untouched? There are literally millons of images that have to be proccesed, it only takes one anomalie for us to catch it.

As to the SHARD, the close up is amazing. Obviously impact craters ritaling the structure. Not surprising this anomalie has never been reimaged even after Hoagland requested.

Musc, Thanks!

Also I only included one image of TLP (Transient Light Phenom.). There are thousands of cases of these since the 1500's. Many, many photos of these unusall lights on the moon (mostly from astronaut films!).







[edit on 6-1-2006 by StarfleetCommand]


reply posted on 6-1-2006 @ 05:42 PM by Im a true sceptic
Originally posted by StarfleetCommand

True skeptic, could u elaborate about your challenge? As to more anomalies there are hundreds, possibly even thousands. Some anomalies though I chose not to post here for a variety of reasons. Most of them were of unusall shapes, etc that I felt werent up to par of being even remotely something. I am not an expert in topographical analysis though. As to the object moving up hill, one of the astronauts (I cant recall which) said he saw a light moving on the surface and when they imaged it this was the result. It looks like a rock, but how in the hell is it moving up that hill. The track pattern indicates either that A) Its not spheroid or B) Its changing directions slightly. I mean wtf on this one.



yes - since i was quite young - i remeber this subject being discussed in a weekly publication called `the unexplained` , i actually still have this in the loft the picture `climbing up hill` is so blatantly obvious - or rather it appears that way.


the analysis of the picture in this publication went into quite some depth as to what it was...btw - it wasnt a rock.

With regard to my challenge - as long as any of these images are taken from the moon side thats facing us - from the resolution ive seen of these moon shots, ive seen better made with present day mead 8 inch telescopes - and i know people who own these frequent here... so my challege was if anyones got a decent amatuer astronomy scope maybe theyd like to look at these areas of the moon.?





reply posted on 7-1-2006 @ 07:04 AM by Im a true sceptic
Originally posted by StarfleetCommand
Yea, unfort I don't think anyone of us have access to the size telescope needed to confirm some of the anomalies.



You reckon?

www.slamm.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk...
ukastroimaging.co.uk...
ukastroimaging.co.uk...
homepage.ntlworld.com...


- takes a time to load......


in the sigs of these guys your see some technical data - celestron 8 means a telescope with an 8 inch mirror - again i feel the chance of using a quality amateur setup should give results. After all the relics are quite large, and from several miles up they look quite large - most anomalise fill a quarter of most meadium sized craters.

One crater can be seen with a telescope - its the crater with the perfect triangle in its centre - have you seen this one?? -

www.mufor.org...

So really i still stand by assertion that these or some if on the side facing us should be visable with a decent telescope - and affordable by the average hobbyist.


One other thing , this is a flight of fancy , but im looking at the pictures and come up with this titbit, time and time again - what if the craters near these relics are actually from weapons or some kind of planetary bombardment that wiped out who ever lived in the craters - or rather areas that werent cratered until they where bombarded???

Hope this helps.




[edit on 7-1-2006 by Im a true sceptic]

[edit on 7-1-2006 by Im a true sceptic]


reply posted on 7-1-2006 @ 07:16 AM by trIckz_R_fO_kIdz


Yeh thats fake look at the bottem right hand cornor says disney or something, I think it was from one of there shows they used to play like space quest or something, but I dont know I have not watched that channel in like 7 years.

Also about Richard!!!
www.thespaceshow.com...
He was on the space show recently (two days about) I recommend you listen to it, its free for download in the Link I gave, he explanes alot of important things that will explane alot of why Nasa trys there best to cover these things up.



What about the tower?



makes a perfect match almost, just if Nasa would stop withholding so many images!!! Lets see when we asked for the High definition photo of the face on mars they withheld it for three months then released it to the public with almost unnoticable edits done to it.

Heres my take on the Mars face I know there not on the moon but I find it interesting


Orignal



As you can see It is a face in this post viking image one

www.enterprisemission.com...

this will give you a idea on how big it is

Now Nasa says however this is actually what the face really looks like 30 years later!! SEE ITS NOT A FACE GUYS



Now somehow U.S. warplanes (NASA) bombed the face beyond recongnition?

If you guys wanna talk about cover ups go ahead but face it NASA withholds stuff all the time and when they do release something it takes them along time, since they probally have editing skills beyond our comprehension that whole photo could be fake for all we know.


In other news Richard C Holglen seems to have this idea that our ancestors are from Mars or something. I believe these structures (god knows how old they are) are in fact left overs of a anchient advanced civilization before the first great distruction (Nuclear war, the destroyer, gods anger, or whatever you think happen) and since everyone who writes the books on those things and studys them see that they were all of course more advanced then us, I believe that we did go to the moon way before the pyramids so eat that.

[edit on 7-1-2006 by trIckz_R_fO_kIdz]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 48 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.