It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Brazil-UFO BR-101

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 5 2006 @ 05:03 PM
link   
This is an interesting video made in Brazil, just warning, the quality of the video is not very good, that's why I don't think it is some kind of home made video.
Anyway, take a look:
somostodosum.ig.com.br...

Above, the translation portuguese->english of the comments:
Commentarist: (...) Rio de janeiro to Vitória on Espirito Santo.
Person 1: Four Balls, you can see four balls.
Commentarist: Take a look, the UFO is shining very much, and dissapears.
Person 2: (...) *sarcasm* It's a Flying saucer here.
Commentarist: And every time he returns seems like it is multiplying.
Woman: --- (doesn't matter what she says
)
Commentarist: The light was is the sky of Casemiro de Abreu (city) for 1 hour and a half.
Person 3: (...) It's moving..
Commentarist: The UFO was seen by many drivers that were driving by the BR-101
Person: ..(now everything gets confused)

Nice huh?

Sorry for the poor translation, but I guess you can understand the most of it.
[]'s




posted on Jan, 7 2006 @ 12:18 PM
link   
Hello tunin


This video is quite known and remains one of the best ufo evidence. The ufo is clearly standing up there voluntarily, showing some wonderful lights sequences to the numerous lucky witnesses. I am amazed each time i watch this beautiful ufo.

The quality of the video is not very good and quite jerky. I have a longer and better quality version. I'll upload it and post a link if you don't mind.

Thanks for this thread
. People have to be aware of this kind of footage.

All the best,
Musclor



posted on Jan, 7 2006 @ 12:45 PM
link   
Ok i have uploaded the video. A few screenshots :




Full video here : Spirito Santo, Brazil, 1991 (Zipped, Avi, 9.4Mo)

btw tunin you have one of my vote



posted on Jan, 7 2006 @ 12:48 PM
link   
???

I'm sorry but this video has a very bad quality. Of course I see this UFO changing colors and light patterns, but the framerate is so slow and the image resolution so bad that it could very well be a hoax. I'm not saying it is... but there's room for that.

I wonder why do most of these so-called authentic UFO footages have so much poor video quality, and are always shaky...



posted on Jan, 7 2006 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Echtelion
I'm sorry but this video has a very bad quality. Of course I see this UFO changing colors and light patterns, but the framerate is so slow and the image resolution so bad that it could very well be a hoax. I'm not saying it is... but there's room for that.


See post above...



posted on Jan, 7 2006 @ 10:34 PM
link   
There seems to be no end to the demands from debunkers.

-If the video or pic is jerky or poor quality, it is a hoax.
-If the video or pic is good quality, it is a hoax.
-if people's voices are heard in the background, its layered over and a hoax
-if there are no voices or background noice, it is a hoax
-if an object is seen, it is a meteor, venus, balloons,clouds and err...blimps.
-if only one person seen it, he is a liar, a conman, a drunkard, a pimp,etc.
-if many has seen it, all who saw it are suffering from mass hysteria.
-etc.
-if witness gives up explaining in frustration, he is a hoaxer
-if witness continues to explain what he saw, he is perpetrating a fraud.

sometimes i wonder why...



posted on Jan, 7 2006 @ 11:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
There seems to be no end to the demands from debunkers.

-If the video or pic is jerky or poor quality, it is a hoax.
-If the video or pic is good quality, it is a hoax.
-if people's voices are heard in the background, its layered over and a hoax
-if there are no voices or background noice, it is a hoax
-if an object is seen, it is a meteor, venus, balloons,clouds and err...blimps.
-if only one person seen it, he is a liar, a conman, a drunkard, a pimp,etc.
-if many has seen it, all who saw it are suffering from mass hysteria.
-etc.
-if witness gives up explaining in frustration, he is a hoaxer
-if witness continues to explain what he saw, he is perpetrating a fraud.

sometimes i wonder why...



Now relax a little bit... I consider myself as believer since I've made a UFO observation in the summer of 2000 that was obvious enough to shut the many doubts I had about UFOs before.

I've seen the better version of the video now, but even if the object seems very interesting for its realism, I took note that all that we see is the object, and then it cuts to a bunch of people looking at the skies, and then cuts back to the object. THere is no transition, no travelling, and especially no view of the object as in the same frame as the people that were filmed. Ok, perhaps they could'nt have filmed it better, I know, but all I say is that it's just not 100% convincing and authentic. It could very well be the result of editing magic. It was harder to do things like that in 1991, but still possible if someone had some expertise in film effects and editing.




[edit on 7/1/06 by Echtelion]



posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 05:45 AM
link   
Thanks for the larger (and better quality) video and the vote Musclor

I don't think it's a hoax, first because the commentarist voice seems to be very familiar to me, actually, he is from Globo TV, one of Brazil's most watched TV channel and they wouldn't show something not-knowing the credibility.
Btw, SeekerofTruth101, some points of your argument are false:

-if there are no voices or background noice, it is a hoax.
Wrong, you can hear at the end of the video a truck engine start.

-if an object is seen, it is a meteor, venus, balloons,clouds and err...blimps.
Meteors, Planets, Balloons, Clouds and Blimps (rs) are shape-shifting?

-if only one person seen it, he is a liar, a conman, a drunkard, a pimp,etc.
Nice conclusion :no:

-if many has seen it, all who saw it are suffering from mass hysteria.
So was the camera/video recording machine.

-if witness gives up explaining in frustration, he is a hoaxer.
LOL

-if witness continues to explain what he saw, he is perpetrating a fraud.
Oh yeah, few words of guessing wtf is in the sky can prove hoaxes



posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 07:27 AM
link   
The appearance of the UFO during the first few seconds of the film reminds me of the NASA UFOs filmed from space during the 90s:



The film appears genuine to me at the moment. I can't think of any known man-made objects which this could be.



posted on Jan, 8 2006 @ 07:37 AM
link   
To be honest, if I came across a perfect video of a ufo I'd think that was more likely to be a hoax.
A perfect picture to me means that you had a little too long to prepare for its arrival, get the right camera and sort it out.

Plus jerky footage adds to the mystique!



posted on Jan, 9 2006 @ 07:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by JackofBlades
To be honest, if I came across a perfect video of a ufo I'd think that was more likely to be a hoax.
A perfect picture to me means that you had a little too long to prepare for its arrival, get the right camera and sort it out.

Plus jerky footage adds to the mystique!


I know what you mean - remember the video of the ufo filmed from a helicopter next to the twin towers? Looked astonighingly real but just turned out to be a Sci-Fi channel promo! Keeping a steady hand whilst filming something astounding like a ufo is virtually impossible unless you're using a tripod I would guess.



posted on Apr, 20 2009 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
There seems to be no end to the demands from debunkers.

-If the video or pic is jerky or poor quality, it is a hoax.
-If the video or pic is good quality, it is a hoax.
-if people's voices are heard in the background, its layered over and a hoax
-if there are no voices or background noice, it is a hoax
-if an object is seen, it is a meteor, venus, balloons,clouds and err...blimps.
-if only one person seen it, he is a liar, a conman, a drunkard, a pimp,etc.
-if many has seen it, all who saw it are suffering from mass hysteria.
-etc.
-if witness gives up explaining in frustration, he is a hoaxer
-if witness continues to explain what he saw, he is perpetrating a fraud.

sometimes i wonder why...


Lol -good call

Video has been removed -was it any good?



posted on Apr, 20 2009 @ 11:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by karl 12

Video has been removed -was it any good?


Karl, Here is a short version of the video in question:

(click to open player in new window)

Source

There should be a longer version somewhere


In 1991, near Rio (Brazil), a UFO was filmed from a very busy road of Espiritu Santo. Several motorists had stopped to observe it. The UFO appears to show us some of these capabilities: flash lights of several colors, missing it ...

Accuracy: There were no aircraft in flight during this observation.

www.ovni-infos.fr...




posted on Apr, 20 2009 @ 01:56 PM
link   
Internos, a thousand thanks for posting that one -its very strange footage indeed.


Have absolutely no idea what that object could be

Cheers.

[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join