US will invade Iran in '06, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 3-1-2006 @ 06:34 AM by Souljah
I found this Article, which you might find Interesting.

Der Spiegel

Recent reports in the German media suggest that the United States may be preparing its allies for an imminent military strike against facilities that are part of Iran's suspected clandestine nuclear weapons program.

It's hardly news that US President George Bush refuses to rule out possible military action against Iran if Tehran continues to pursue its controversial nuclear ambitions. But in Germany, speculation is mounting that Washington is preparing to carry out air strikes against suspected Iranian nuclear sites perhaps even as soon as early 2006.

According to Ulfkotte's report, "western security sources" claim that during CIA Director Porter Goss' Dec. 12 visit to Ankara, he asked Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to provide support for a possibile 2006 air strike against Iranian nuclear and military facilities. More specifically, Goss is said to have asked Turkey to provide unfettered exchange of intelligence that could help with a mission. DDP also reported that the governments of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Oman and Pakistan have been informed in recent weeks of Washington's military plans.

I think the Attack will begin in Early Spring 2006.


reply posted on 3-1-2006 @ 06:46 AM by TaupeDragon
There's a link although obviously the source is probably going to take the Israeli point of view.


TD

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...

(edit - usually helps if I post the link. Hmm. Time for that second cup of coffee I think.)

[edit on 3-1-2006 by TaupeDragon]


reply posted on 3-1-2006 @ 03:59 PM by LivinInTraffic
Originally posted by Conquistadork
When it comes to the youth of a nation wanting a regime change, I think it's safe to say that can be applied to any nation at this particular moment in history. Especially in the US.

Does that mean Venezuela is going to start bombing military facilities and launch amphibious assaults on Florida?

Doubt it.

The people of a nation wanting a change in government is hardly justification for another war, especially when that same thought process could be applied to almost any major nation. If we started liberating people based on their feelings towards their government we should start with ourselves and then worry about others.


well, it is true that the will of the people wanting change is not justification for another country to declare war, it IS justification for a change

However, I disagree when you say that the thought could be applied to any other nation. Here and in other democratic country, change can come about through elections, and public opinion will (ideally) rule. In closed societies like iran, that is not possible. The ruling party, in this case conservative muslims, censor the society and do not allow dissent to affect them. This is ecspecially true in theocraticly ruled countries like Iran, where almost all aspects of people's lives are under government control.

It is in these despotic governments that the hatred and the sort of frantic patriotism exists that spawns those who commit terrorism. That is not to say that all terrorists come from these sorts of governments, but it is very true that these sorts of governments do create a sort of breeding ground for the extremism required of terrorism. That is why we as a free people must foster change in such countries, to not only protect ourselves, but open closed societies and allow the personal freedom that is necessary for peace.

Of course, fostering change does not mean you have to invade, there are many other ways to cause change in a closed society from the outside. The best way, in my opinion, to end Iran's theocracy is to let the youth keep watching mtv on thier satillite televisions, or in other words expose them to our culture. While our culture is far from perfect, young Iranians see our society and they envy it. They grow tired of thier closed, constrictive society, and grow to desire a more open country. However, this sort of method takes time, and those in power in Iran see these changes coming and become even more adament in thier control over thier people and hatred of the example we set. So if Iran becomes a threat before these changes can take place, an military invasion would be necessary to protect our own country, and to liberate the iranian people. The negatives of this of course are the loss in American lives, and the chance that other neighboring countries will use a war in Iran as an excuse to radicalize themselves, which is a little of what is happening in Iraq. So, its a tough decision and all consequences must be considered before war should be declared.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



You heard of SOPA and PIPA.Now ACTA! Must read.
  Posted 19 days ago with 25 member flags
On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 6 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags