Originally posted by wang
Well thats is something i have wonderd myself, the people who deny the holocaust, why? Anti-semitism? White supremists? And honestly how much can
they gain from denying it? They straight out get labeld as nuts and some have been arrested and deported from certain countries.
Why are they denying it? Everyone has a reason.
Excellent questions, wang.
From the research I have done, it is because of their ideological beliefs.
Virtually all holocaust deniers have a number of things in common: they are either antisemitic, white power idealists, disguise their antisemitism
under anti-Jew, anti-Israel, anti-Zionists claims, have not once sought to question the numbers for other world event genocides, but single out but
one: the Holocaust, they proliferate anti-Semitic conspiracy theories [Israel was behind 9/11, etc], etc., etc.....
This article [linked below] may be of interest?
It mentions in the matter of proofs for the Holocaust:
We prove the Holocaust through a convergence of data that include: Written documents-letters, memos, blueprints of the camps, orders, bills, speeches,
articles, memoirs and confessions. Eyewitness testimony accounts from survivors, members of the Jewish sonderkomandos who took bodies out of the gas
chambers, SS guards, commandants, local townspeople and high-ranking nazi officials. We have many letters from German soldiers stationed on the
Russian front to their families in, which they describe the mass shooting of Jews. Photographs-including official military and press photographs,
civilian photographs, secret photographs taken by survivors, aerial photographs, German and allied film footage and photographs taken by the German
military. The camps themselves; And inferential evidence-population demographic, reconstructed from pre-World War II. For example, if six million were
not killed, what happened to all these people?
Then concerning holocaust denial and deniers, the article goes on to mention:
For such reasons, denial of the Holocaust is much like the denial of something in science which has been confirmed by multiple lines of independent
evidence, such as evolution. Just as creationism, which is presented as opposition to evolution, is nothing more than a psuedoscience, so, too, is
Holocaust denial nothing more than pseudohistory.
--snip--
The reasons why people engage in holocaust denial are varied, but among the Holocaust deniers a very common theme is "the Jews" - it doesn't matter
what the actual content is, so long as something negative is being said about Jews. Their anti-semitic orientation is quite plain, and so the motive
of anti-semitism cannot be ignored when examining their revisionist works.
--snip--
Shermer and Grobman through this book reveal that Holocaust Denial is not skepticism, and that the revisionists are not being genuinely skeptical.
Honest skepticism involves an inquisitive attitude which, as far as is humanly possible, is not marred by political or ethnic prejudices. Skepticism
also involves a willingness to follow the evidence wherever it leads, rather than ignoring that which does not fit preconceived desires.
Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened and Why do they Say
it?
seekerof
[edit on 7-1-2006 by Seekerof]