Unlike you, I'm investing my spare time here, so it's becoming somewhat illogical to waste it voluntarily by arguing for reasons other than fact
finding.
You claim you have adressed the points raised - back it up!
I claim you haven't adressed the points raised - my back up:
Your posts
Now do you want me to prove how you never adressed them by posting the posts in which you didn't? Impossible. A post that shows you adressing them
(and I mean adresssing them scientifically, with reason, not ridiculing them without fact backing) would prove me wrong though - couldn't find one.
I'm sure you know better than I do where it could be found, so...
Why is there no computer simulation of the WTC collapse?, page 3
privacy
reply posted on 3-1-2006 @ 08:37 AM by AgentSmith
Originally posted by Lumos
Unlike you, I'm investing my spare time here, so it's becoming somewhat illogical to waste it voluntarily by arguing for reasons other than fact finding.
Ah there you go again, and you wonder why I stick a tin-foil hat on your head.
Your absolutely right - I'm actually a special agent and I've been specially assigned just to you because you're so important..
Don't you think they'd get someone with a little more tact and a lot more knowledge? Duh...
A megalomaniac who screams at people, puts them down and acts like a moron is hardly an ideal Government shill, I seem to make people even more set in their views if anything - so I think I'd probably be sacked by now.
Common sense should point that out - hence the evidence of paranoia against anyone that even hints at any support of anything 'official'.
You claim you have adressed the points raised - back it up!
I doubt I addressed the ones regarding the metal analysis - mainly due to not having bothered reading it and therefore not really being able to enter the argument one way or another. I have a full time job and a home life - as well as numerous other interests to spend it all reading that to be honest - it's really not a priority to me. I'm not an architect or structural engineer so I really don't care and may not understand it enough.
You asked initially about:
If you're really a genuine truth seeker, what explanation did you find convincing enough to no further discuss the squibs, the unprecedented paralysis of the US air defense and the freefall collapse of WTC7? I'd <3 to hear it.
Which I have discussed before, I've even remember making little animated GIFs when talking about the squibs. You want to read about my view - you find it - I don't have time.
I claim you haven't adressed the points raised - my back up: Your posts
See above
[edit on 3-1-2006 by AgentSmith]
An Overview and Debunking of the AE9/11T\'s List of Demolition Signs
Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags
Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Final Decision: Court sanctions lawyers behind September 11 conspiracy case
Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.098 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.098 seconds
