I keep hearing people say, well maybe it isn't appreciated quite how complex this is to achieve and how much computing power it actually takes.
To put things into persepective, I found this article on a computer simulation showing the impact of the airliner into the Pentagon:
news.bbc.co.uk...
Note this section:
Professor Sozen first created a mathematical model of the reinforced concrete columns which supported the Pentagon building.
This was turned into a simulation, representing the plane as thousands of small squares containing specific physical characteristics.
It was a laborious process. Creating just one-tenth of a second of the simulation took about 95 hours of computation time on a supercomputer.
And this was relatively simple, so perhaps that is the answer why we are still waiting for a computer simulation of the collapse, because it takes an
incredible length of time to input the data and then for the computer to actually do the calculations. The WTC fires and collapse would be far, far
more complicated than this simulation and this one takes
95 hours for
1/10th second.
Some people seem to think it could be done over a weekend or even a year. If we use these figures as a base, forgetting that the simulation of the WTC
collapse would be FAR more complicated and would require even MORE computing time:
It was about 104 minutes between the North Tower impact and it's collapse, everything would have to be simulated to make it realistic. I'm sure if a
simulation was made of just the collapse for instance, a lot of people would be crying that it was a farce as they didn't simulate the conditions
properly
So 95 hours for 1/10th second, One second of the simulation would take 950 hours.
In 104 minutes there are 6240 seconds.
6240 seconds times 950 hours is 5,928,000 hours.
5,928,000 hours divided by 24 gives 247000 days.
247000 days divided by 365 gives 676.71 years.
Obviously in practice, I'm sure that certain aspects like the initial impact and the collapse would take much longer to compute than others, but this
is probably the reason we are not seeing lots of lovely simulation video like we all hoped for.
Even if we just took into account the collapse itself over about 12 seconds, it would still be 475 days. And I'm sure the calculations required for
the collapse would be far more complicated and take far longer than than the calculations required to simulate the aircraft impact into the
pentagon.
This is also pure computing time, it doesn't take into account the many, many weeks required of data input to create the simulation in the first
place.
I also doubt anyone would have exclusive access to a computer powerful enought to do the task for such extended periods of time.
Good luck to those of you hoping to re-create it on your home computer
[edit on 2-1-2006 by AgentSmith]