posted on Sep, 29 2003 @ 12:18 PM
Originally posted by The Real Deal
They were built from around 500BC, by the Nubians who eventually became pharos of Upper and Lower Egypt.
No disputing that! www.egyptologyonline.com...
However, the pyramids, considered one of the wonders of the ancient world, are considerably older than the Nubian pyramids. The Giza complex of
pyramids has always been known... the Nubian pyramids were lost until 1890.
They had been ruled by Egypt proper a thousand years or 2 before hand, but after that had stopped, they maintained many of the ancient ways, and so
reintroduced forgotten arts and styles back once they ruled Egypt.
If you go to the museums, you'll see that they introduced new styles and that the Nubian art of the 2000 BC era is rather different than the Egyptian
art and the later Nubian art. It wasn't so much a reintroduction (because it really didn't sweep the more technologically advanced Egypt) but a
BYRD...Where do ya think they got the eye from..Egypt Perhaps??
The eye as a symbol is very ancient. In the case of the dollar bill, it's a Masonic influence. However, as the Masons themselves admit, their
knowledge and symbols began in the 1700's.
The Nubians are believed to be the first human race on earth,
I'd dispute that from a scientific standpoint. Australopithecenes are the first hominids, and homo erectus was the first human and therefore
(technically) the first race. Africans aren't primitive humans (unlike homo erectus) OR neanderthals OR heidelbergensis (which may also have had
racial groups.) They're modern man but modern man isn't the FIRST man to walk on earth.
and most of their customs and traditions were adopted by the ancient Egyptians,passed on to Solomon and David the knowledge kept being handed down
finally on to the Masons and as america seems to have sooo much masonic sybolism which comes from egyptians thats where they got it from...
The problem with this argument is that when you say "okay. Show me the ancient knowlege" you get a lot of answers and a lot of intellectual
A proof of the reality would be a known and certifiable ancient manuscript or engravings showing the important and arcane knowledge. That knowledge
would have to match the knowledge we see in Egyptian translations we have by scholars (with better scholarship than Sitchin, who still can't read
Babylonian cuneiform.) That would then have to match some of the old documents and books we have from the Knights Templar and the Illuminati sects
(and I can tell you that there's no match there) and those would have to match the Masonic documents (weak match.)
Sad to say (because I love the field) but the occultic groups generally rely on "channeled" and "inspirational" evidence. Very little of it has
been proved true.