Originally posted by zoso28
Throughout history, soldiers of all nations have added their own kit to there basic issue materials. Everything from knives and guns, clothing and
footwear. Body armor is no different. Excellent body armor can be purchased by any soldier to add to his kit.

There are one or two problems with purchasing your own body armour, even if it is superior to the issue stuff. The biggest problem is litigation. If
you are killed while wearing privately purchased armour, military life insurance may not cover any wounds that you receive as you were not using
authorised personal protection equipment. This may leave your family with a financial burden to add to their great personal loss. Another question is
that of quality control. If allowed to buy their own armour, the average GI is likely to use the kit that is most comfortable or easy to wear.
Unfortunately, comfy body armour tends not to stop a lot of the stuff flying around the sandpit. This leads to lots of folded flags.
I believe that the army is fully capable of issuing body armour to all of the troops on deployment. They are capable of issuing everyone a
weapon/webbing/uniform etc., so what is the problem with issuing a piece of equipment that is proven to save lives?