It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theshadowknows
Originally posted by JIMC5499
I have designed thousands of parts. I do CAD design for a living. The original intention of this project was to design a viable aircraft, if we want to change that to concepts I have no problem with that. I would like to see what we could come up with as a viable design though. I figure with some work and research we might hit the equivilent of an F-5. When I build a machine I don't worry about things like motors and hydraulic pumps, I define my specifications and then look for an existing component that meets my specifications. I don't expect us to design a jet engine someone else had done that for us. This is why I feel that if we want a serious aircraft we should stay within the limits of proven technology.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
My vote would be to walk before we run. Let's keep it simple. Nothing says that we can't try one now and something more advances later. My vote would be something with the capabilities of say an F-5
Originally posted by planeman
I assumed this whole thing was about coming up with a concept design. Trying to design an aircraft to the point that someone could actually build it is far beyond the vast majority of site members and at any rate, people seem more interested in fast jets than motorized gliders.
If the “real plane” guys want to start the ATS-2 project then cool, but I suggest that we keep ATS-1 as a concept aircraft.
Fighter Master FIN, maybe when you have all the suggestions in you should put the poll as a new thread. Each submission could have a 200 word description to explain the basic design ideas.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
I'd suggest something along the lines of:
- Single engined (off the shelf unit)
- Strictly subsonic, with slightly swept wing (15-20 deg @ MAC)
- Aerodynamically stable
- No canards
- Two-crew (reduce avionic complexity and allow service as trainer)
- Trike landing gear (again off shelf if possible)
But I'll leave that up to others here to decide
Once you guys have finalised your design brief (what you want the aeroplane to do), next step is to get as much data on contemporary, comparable machines as possible, things like:
Wing area,
Engine thrust (or power if its prop driven),
MTOW,
EmptyW,
Range,
as much general data as possible for more accurate predictions on the initial sizings of the ATS-1.
[edit on 28-12-2005 by kilcoo316]
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Kilco, with what you want, we might as well go with a trainer jet.
Shattered OUT...