It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THENEO
You know, I can't disagree with anything you said here but there is annother side to this story,
did the other side tell the truth?
HUH!?! We're talking about reporters....reporting!
when in a conflict do you want to hand your opponent the ammo to deep six you?
In the military, there are people who's job is to be nothing BUT a filter of possibly damaging information
would everyone agree with what was going on if they did say everything?
And you see a problem with disagreement? One of the tenants of Heir Goebbles brand of facist propaganda was to immediately label & damage any dissent with the heading of TREASON. (psst....learn from history)
would more lives have been lost if complete disclosure was made?
Lives would have been saved and actions brought into tighter scrutiny so that military men can make military plans....not the S of D
was the UN and the opposing countries telling the complete truth (such as France, Germany etc.)?
Operating under a media lens OR getting a bye via a complicit media....tell me the source more likely to tell the truth?
should we tell the truth or the whole story when no one else is obligated to do so?
how could someone not be capable of seeing the quandry here?
How can someone believe in a fantasy MATRIX, yet be blind to the one trying to ensnare those who chose the right color pill and are FULLY AWARE!?!?!