Originally posted by riley
I still have not seen any evidence that it is specifically the illuminati [as in the actually group not 'them' or a vague definition] running
things. I was under the impression that they were a group that were born through intellectual oppression and consisted of scientists, philophers,
writers, artists etc.. who needed protection from the *Catholic church [which is why I find it strange when people say the pope is a member?]
Wouldn't it be contradictory for them to want to control populations to the point where they cannot express new ideas? Wouldn't 'illuminating'
humanity be their ultimate goal opposed to wanting to put it in shackles and prevent the next generation from making intellectual and technological
progress? There may very well be shadow governments etc.. but there's no reason to assume it's this one group when historically their princibles
have been at odds with those with [official] power. I'm starting to think this group is a victim of propaganda and has been used as a scapegoat..
further proved by Ratz's request for a *new world order.
The illuminati [if they exist] may be the good guys.
If there still is a modernday Illuminati, this is my take on them:
Their mission is not to illuminate humanity. Because, from what I understand, the Illuminati is a group of select few people who have the knowledge of
many things that ordinary people don't, these things, whatever they are, enable them to control people to some extent. Then they have their
followers, who want to attain this knowledge, but few of them ever will. Maybe that's what enables them to control these followers, gullibility?
Maybe there is no 'secret knowledge'?
Anyway, it's a bit like when the first caveman learned how to create fire, and knew how to keep it going, other cavemen and women gathered around the
fire because it gave them warmth when it was cold and it gave them light when it was dark. They probably thought it was magic.
So basicly, this caveman who knew how to create fire, the 'illuminated' caveman, could then control other people to some extent with his knowledge.
Like if this illuminated caveman requested that another caveman would give him some of his food, and that caveman would deny the request, the
illuminated one could deny him fire, and thus, eventually the other caveman would probably give in. Then this illuminated caveman would probably at
some point make alliances with a select few cavemen that he trusted etc.
However, eventually some other cavemen figured out how to create fire, and shared the knowledge with others, and so the first illuminati ended.
Do you get what I'm saying?
The catholic church was nothing better. They claimed they had this divine knowledge and somekind of special connection with God. They said they knew
that places like heaven and hell existed, that the bible was the truth, that the Church was the house of God and that people had to worship God there.
The Church was very powerful back then, and had control over many countries.
They were nothing but control freaks, just like the Illuminati.
However, they were competitors to the Illuminati, they burned illuminated ones on the stake ... witches, warlocks etc.
The fact that other people learn stuff isn't their fear, as long as they can control what people believe. They want people to think as they think,
and to believe as they believe. To them there is only one truth, just like with these organized religions and certain ideologies, well infact, you
could say illuminism is a religion.
They want to create a world according to their "truth", and they, in their own minds think that this is the right thing to do, and that it will save
humanity.
Freedom is their enemy.
Stick to your personal beliefs, not to one "truth" that somebody claims to know.
[edit on 1/1/2006 by SwearBear]
[edit on 1/1/2006 by SwearBear]