Did They Need to do This as a Joke or is it True?

Here is another old ATS thread from 2004. It is on the Jokes, Puns, & Pranks board.
One small step for man " Oh hell "



Its too bad that the links don't work anymore.

wow that was a good laugh,thank for the link.

I might have been fooled if it was`nt so Key stone cops type acting ,Neil dos`nt crap himself with the big crash only slowly turns and does the bloopers shrug.

or set up,the shock technique would have had the same result if Osama ran across set with G.W chasing him,the lenghts people go to,i loved it tho

If I recall correctly, that was created by a studio who had recently bought a camera from that time period and decided to make the clip as a prank. The audio is actual audio edited (and possibly some new stuff added?).

Definately a fake video as others have pointed out, but it is amusing.



You can't. That would be some insane resolution to be able to read a newspaper from orbit. I don't think even the secret spy satillites could do that. Not yet anyway.

But we can get clearer images of the Earth from space because the satillites are closer to Earth, then a telescope on Earth looking at the Moon. You would need to put an imaging satillite in orbit around the Moon to get images of the Apollo landing sites. And NASA will be doing that next year I believe.

350,000km is alot further than the 300km a spy satellite is from the surface of the earth, lol

im a astrophysicist (ok so only for a year but still im qualified) (u can tell by the bad spelling)

no optical telescope on earth has the resolution to see any of the flags left by the apollo astronauts, they would just appear as dots, along with the spacecraft

any questions?

So now we are grabbing at straws saying that is not Armstrong's voice
Sounds the same to me...



history1900s.about.com.../XJ&sdn=history1900s&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.historychannel.com%2Fspeeches%2Farchive%2Fspeech_9.h tml

LOL the origional link is to Gaiaguys, a web site run by a cousin of mine in Australia.

The video shown was made for a comercial and is NOT serious.... yes it is a joke.

The Admission to the joke has been cached at this link.
web.archive.org...://www.moontruth.com/full.htm

web.archive.org...*/www.moontruth.com...

The Way Back Machine is your friend

It seems the page was taken down between the dates of Oct 12, 2004 and Feb 5, 2005.

[edit on 25-12-2005 by sardion2000]

You propose an interesting scenario here; do you have any recommendations for further reading on these theories?

All you ever seem to hear from a conspiracy point of view is that the landing never happened, but the idea that it might have done and some unusual circumstances followed is an intriguing one.

Just google up Richard C Hoaglund and you'll get what you're looking for. I think at one point he claimed they stopped the moon missions because they found a domed "City" up there, and claimed to show photographic "proof" of such domes. He claims they also exist on Mars, Ieptus and probably Venus and Saturn to boot. You'll find that side much more entertaining to say the least. I miss the 90s sometimes

[edit on 25-12-2005 by sardion2000]

Your desperate to find a conspiracy arn't you!
The discussion is only 2 pages long, surely you must have bothered reading that! It's not like it's 50 pages or something

Just in case you missed, the video is an admitted hoax.

EDIT:

The hiding stuff might be true, we did ask Dr Aldrin about Aliens briefly, but he didn't really elaborate much. His wife said more to be honest and he went kind of quiet. The Armstrong speech a few years abck where he says at the end:



is interesting, Apollo Hoax Believers like to filter it down to

"Today we have with us a group of students, among America's best. To you we say we have only completed a beginning. We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truth's protective layers."

or better still:

"breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of the truth's protective layers"

but when you look at it within context it seems to imply there is more going on than we know.

[edit on 25-12-2005 by AgentSmith]

Not at all, I called it a BADLY manufactured,hokey cartoon when I saw it live
on TV in 69, and a box of rocks does not prove a thing.
We will not be allowed onto the Moon even if we wished to.It is off limits.

Why do you ignore the Apollo mirror siriuslyone?

You know its there, so does nearly every scientist on earth that has calculated distance to the moon.

Deny Ignorance?

Guess we will have to agree to dis-agree, as conspiracies have been cooked since way before Roswell..Philadelphia Experiment??etc. etc.

www.orwelltoday.com...

If Armstong was the first man on the moon, who took the outside picture?
Science tells me I am a quark, so how can they be believed since a quark CANNOT be seen?

If you want to make a point, at least try find some "evidence" that doesnt say the moon landing was a Stanley Kubrick production.

Ugh... I hate when that is mentioned.

Really, if the moon landing was a hoax, the Russians would have been all over the "evidence".

I would gladly debate any "evidence" you can bring up that the moon landing was a hoax.

And before you even bring up the whole "b-b-b-but who filmed Neil Armstrong" argument here:




www.redzero.demon.co.uk...
external image

There is no such thing as evidence if a person is a believer.I have studied this anamoly since 1969 and CANNOT find any evidence as to why we are not going back..There is too much garbled rhetoric about WHAT the rocks told us..and why it is not published..
No reason to continue, same as debating the lone gunman theory, never will come to naught.

Many nations around the globe are planning moon missions in the coming years.



www.usatoday.com...

www.news10.net...

I'll give you a hint. It's green, very thin, made of a paper like material, it has a set value... and NASA lacks a lot of it.

That's really all there is to it. NASA doesn't have the money to develop a vehicle to get to the Moon at this time. Not to hard to figure out. Plus it seems a lot of American's either don't care or don't want there tax dollars going towards something they think is pointless.

>>I'll give you a hint. It's green, very thin, made of a paper like material, it has a set value... and NASA lacks a lot of it.

That's really all there is to it. NASA doesn't have the money to develop a vehicle to get to the Moon at this time. Not to hard to figure out. Plus it seems a lot of American's either don't care or don't want there tax dollars going towards something they think is pointless.<<

There was NO point in "MAKING it to the Moon in the first place, but trying to keep a promise that JFK made, so they had to deliver.NASA was and is in the stone age..Neanderthal technology...