I was just using it as a example of a ellusive nocturnal creature we know exist and yet nobody stumbles across one of the sleeping in the wild. That
just dosent happen.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
ahem ...........comparing a north american big foot and the snow leaopard is pure apples and orranges
the google search of " snow leopard " images draws 16 thousand returns
Yeah and a google search for "bigfoot" images draws 105 thousand returns. Using google returns is a rather weak arguement for any topic.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
the ecology of snow leapoard is some of the most remote terrain on earth , look at its ` range ` - and the population density [ human ] of those
areas - there are HUGE uninhabited areas big foot is claimed to live in california and new england - there is simply no comparision in the human
encoachment of its alledged habitat
Yes its indeed remote it also happens to be said to share its terrain with a bigfoot though its called Yeti. The Northwest of US and Canada (where
most biggfoot sightings occur) has vast uninhabited areas larger then that of even the himalayas. Sightings in places like New England are a Joke no
serious Bigfoot researches bother to look in that area. I think your vastly underestimating just how elusive these cats are in the wild.
link
BTW dgtempe yes Nocturnal means a animal is active at night. I dont know how anybody could make such a claim about bigfoot though
[edit on 23-12-2005 by ShadowXIX]