It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

To those who think NASA is Hiding Evidence

page: 1
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 22 2005 @ 08:18 PM
link   
This is a question directed at those who think NASA has been hiding UFO / ET life evidence.

First off, doesn't NASA want to find ET life?




No life has been discovered on any planet other than the Earth. However, many scientists have concluded that intelligent life may exist on planets orbiting some of the hundreds of billions of stars in our galaxy, the Milky Way.

www.nasa.gov...

The shape of extraterrestrial life
science.nasa.gov...

Searching for Life While Tending the Home Fires
science.nasa.gov...

Goal 2: Explore for past or present habitable environments, prebiotic chemistry and signs of life elsewhere in our Solar System.
astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov...

The Meaning of Life
nai.arc.nasa.gov...

Signs of Life: On the Lookout for Extraterrestrial Sweet Spots
astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov...

imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov...

In Search of E.T.'s Breath
science.nasa.gov...

Looking For Life
nasaexplores.nasa.gov...

This next link contains tons of info.
astroventure.arc.nasa.gov...

So do you think that NASA would hide information on ET life, let alone intelligent ET life just hours of travel away from earth?

Do you believe they are hiding evidence on UFO's?
If so, why? They are obviously doing research to look for signs of life.
Why hide it if they spend the money to research it?

Of course, you could say that its the government telling them to keep it under wraps etc etc. But those excuses get old fast.

What would they need to hide?




posted on Dec, 22 2005 @ 09:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dulcimer

Of course, you could say that its the government telling them to keep it under wraps etc etc. But those excuses get old fast.

What would they need to hide?



The government and NASA, which is part of the government, lack the authority or the knowledge of how to divulge the existence of Extraterrestrials.

It would be like first graders making important announcements for the principle of the school.

First graders have no clue of anything let alone able to make important announcements.

For anyone to come out and tell us there are thousands of Unidentified phenomena that has the power to cloak and they are all over our planet without explaining what that phenomena is would be emasculating for our leaders.

It would be like telling your young children that you are clueless about taking care of them.

ETs hold all the cards and they could bypass the governments on earth and make themselves known to the people in an official way if they wanted to.

They are smart enough to know that would be a bad thing.

NASA is not looking for intelligent life, they know it exist, NASA can’t sneeze without a UFO or two dropping in and watching NASA’s every move. Every mission into space has had an extraterrestrial audience; UFOs have been photographed by astronauts, and picked up by surveillance satellites and spy plains. Not a day goes by that one country or other hasn’t chased a UFO.

If you could throw a stone into space you could possibly hit one----NASA knows it and so do all the governments of the world.

And they don’t like it.



posted on Dec, 22 2005 @ 11:34 PM
link   
Its been 43 years since NASA pilot Joseph Walker made the claim to the media that he was told to film UFOs while in flight and did film UFOs while flying. The film has yet to be released to the public.

There are also a number of other undebunkable UFO sightings like the 1957 RB-47 incident, the 1965 Edwards AFB incident, and the 2000 Illinois incident to name three.

NASA is hiding what they know.

NASA itself is simply a disinformation front by the government. Its whole purpose is to lead the public away from UFO/ET sighting reports to some fantasy that they aren't actually here already.

The entire purpose of hiding ET information by our governments boils down to a simple, one word answer.

Control.

If the public ever realized that there were advanced civilizations that live far better lives than we could ever have under our own contemporary governments, like the dinosaurs, our leaders and institutions would become extinct overnight. Do the people who control our lives want that to happen? Absolutely not. They are going to maintain their grip on us until its pried from their cold, dead hands.

[edit on 22-12-2005 by heelstone]



posted on Dec, 22 2005 @ 11:51 PM
link   
Most of NASA are contract employees whose loyalty is to the company and their paychecks. If they had any proof it would already be exposed by the tens of thousands of contract employees that work in the private sector on NASA contracts.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:07 AM
link   
So why would they create space programs to explore the universe... while at the same time covering up any known evidence to people who could see the evidence with their own eyes on many occasions if it is true.

Why do we need space programs when the ET life comes here?

We have as much proof of et life as NASA in my opinion.

Prove me wrong though.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dulcimer
Why do we need space programs when the ET life comes here?


I would say we would need a space program more then ever if it was proven alien life was already comming to earth. That would mean Earth is very far behind other life forms in terms of space travel. There would be global out cry for advancements in space travel.

If NASA could prove there was alien life it would be a huge boon for their program and their budget would skyrocket. It would no longer be a question of "can we" travel to the stars it would just be a matter of how much resources we have to pour into that tech before we can do it too.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:18 AM
link   
Nasa is just a PR front for the American people.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:27 AM
link   
I think people sometimes really overestimate the knowledge of our leaders. Just because we have video footage of UFO's flying around our spacecraft, doesnt mean we know eveything about their ET civilization.

Yet at the same time, wether we have information pertaining to ET life or not, the information will be held until the time is right. A time when our planet as a whole is ready to work together to achieve a common goal- ie. advancing to the next stage of universal knowledge.

Were still just a bunch of sibblings and school kids fighting eachother and measuring p3nises





posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dulcimer

Why do we need space programs when the ET life comes here?



Maybe its like healthy Elk strutting in front of Wolves to show how strong and healthy they are.


The simple fact is that everyone like me who has said that we have seen UFOs can now point you towards NASA T.V. if you don't believe me.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:47 AM
link   
One thing I guess I should have mentioned is that I have seen some of the so called UFO films taken from shuttle missions etc.

But they are really not that convincing to me. Nothing that would make me say, hmm that really is unexplainable.

A lot of people ignore the fact that the objects can be explained as ice etc.

Again, I want to believe, but I also do not believe NASA is hiding all that much from us.

Yes perhaps they are, but its not to the extent some believe.

Think of it this way. A piece of tape comes back, and everyone is shouting at NASA, what is that, what is that.

Well they are supposed to be the experts. Do they really want to ruin any credibility by saying it is a UFO. *again UFO does not mean spaceship*.

People will start blaming them that the shuttle is falling apart, its unsafe and on and on.

Maybe THAT is the cover up.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 12:58 AM
link   
I think its the fact that no one can or has been able to explain these things.

To me , a person that has had a UFO encounter , it is not so strange for me to see UFOs also in space.

If they can be seen on Earth why not in Space as well.

When you stop thinking about why they can't be here , you are only left with evidence that they are here.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:08 AM
link   
But many of them have been explained, for and against the subject of ufo's.

Some say the objects are ice, close to the camera, some say they are objects several kilometres away from the camera.

But who is to really tell from the videos.

I will not discredit the opinion of anyone, but you do have to accept the fact that ice does build up on every mission and that because of that, it can be a factor in the videos.

UFO's come second.

And if they are spaceships... well don't you think they should be moving a bit faster than we can see on camera?

[edit on 23-12-2005 by Dulcimer]



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Well I can't guess at what videos you are talking about , but the facts are that the STS-114 mission had the most cameras of any STS mission and we have from that mission the highest number of good "Unknowns" captured on film from NASA T.V.

That in and of itself speaks volumes.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:23 AM
link   
What was the name of that rich guy that just came back from his little space trip awhile back.

Didnt he have his camera along with him.

Surely he would capture some good shots.

Although I thought he "lost" his camera or something.....



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:28 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:34 AM
link   
Dulcimer, myself and many others believe that their is and has been a protocol in place for many years now as to how to release this information to the public. Yes, I believe they do know other intelligent life exists but they will not just come out and say it. I think a perfect ex. of this is the recent Mars missions where we found out Mars once had water,(shocking) next will be Mars once had life. Then, maybe Mars does have microbial life now, and so on and so forth. I believe the people in power beleive doing it this way will make it easier and less of a shock factor when the time comes.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:44 AM
link   
People thought there was an actual face monument on mars at one time too.

Im saying that all the photo's and video in the world is nothing without the concrete proof as to what is actually in the photos.

The next time you are in a snowstorm, watch the flakes flutter about and make hair pin turns.

It is better evidence than the NASA material.

Same stuff too. Ice.

Again, my opinion only.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dulcimer

Im saying that all the photo's and video in the world is nothing without the concrete proof as to what is actually in the photos.



At some point you need to ask , what is on the videos?

Should we just dodge these things in space forever?

And simply say they can't exist because we can't explain them?


Or is it simply easier to believe that Airline pilots and hundreds of thousands of people all over the Earth for generations are all crazy?

The mass hysteria argument falls completely apart when UFOs are present in NASA T.V. footage.



[edit on 23-12-2005 by lost_shaman]



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 03:08 AM
link   
dulcimer,


first off the new face pics aren't all that convincing as to it's nonexistence... but otherwise some of the shuttle vids and other circumstantial evidence tend to make some of us skeptical of the "official" story.



posted on Dec, 23 2005 @ 03:11 AM
link   
Dulcimer, you might argue away a lot of the NASA video's, but theres some pretty unexplainable footage too.
It only takes one of those incidents to be true for the whole ET affair to be true.

[edit on 23-12-2005 by Denied]



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join