 |
|
Topic started on 22-12-2005 @ 06:42 AM by waynos
|
In all the recent talk about the Saudi sale I noticed something, the sale is credited as a 'BAE sale' not a Eurofighter sale. On looking at it
further I also notice that the deal with Austria was done by Germany and that the Turks are talking to Italy over a potential order for 100
Typhoons.
So why are sales not handled by Eurofighter as an single entity?
Also, if this is the arrangement are they running a sweepstake for the winner? Maybe the country with the most exports will be the first to get AMSAR
and TVC into service?
If so then Spain needs to pull its finger out!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 08:21 AM by matej
|
If it is true, maybe consortium Eurofighter divided the world on "areas of interest". Germany has middle and east Europe, Italy has Greece and
Turkey, BAe has the rest of close east and Spain has Latin America. But it is only my speculation.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 10:02 AM by waynos
|
Actually you are almost spot on Matej, I think you are only out in terms of the specific areas covered but you are generally right.
Spain still needs to pull its finger out if its going to win the sweep though
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 10:25 AM by waynos
|
Isn't Japan looking for a new fighter as well?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 01:40 PM by Lonestar24
|
Yup, Japan seems to be in the first stages of new procurement. The "Spheres of interest/respect" could be true; however it would also be possible
that by making a deal directly with Eurofighter GmbH it has to be approved by all 4 participating countries; if lets say Suadi Arabia gives BAe the
order to buy X amount of planes and then RESELL them to S-A I think the deal has only to be approved of by the british government.
I´d say its a legal trick to reduce the paperwork. Well, that, and maybe the Eurofighter GmbH simply doesnt have good own promotioners and lobbyists
yet
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 03:25 PM by FredT
|
I think, think mind you that Japan may the first export customer for the F-22 instead of the EF. Just a guess on my part. At least for the Air Sup.
role. The have the money and have the requirment between the North Koreans and the Chinese. I also think that Japan will go with whoever will give
them more offsets as well.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 04:00 PM by tomcat ha
|
Its good to see that the Turkish AF is looking at the Eurofighter. I dont remember if they participate in the JSF programme but this is a better
choice none the less.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 04:01 PM by FredT
|
Originally posted by tomcat ha
Its good to see that the Turkish AF is looking at the Eurofighter. I dont remember if they participate in the JSF programme but this is a better
choice none the less. 
It is a good fit for them both in a military sence and in a politcal sence in terms of joining the EU.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 08:03 AM by waynos
|
I have found a table from Jan 2004 and it is entitled 'Eurofighter Typhoon export prospects'.
Does anyone have any more up to date information (later than Jan 2004) on the following possibilities?
South Korea - 40
Norway - 48+
Australia - 60
Czech Republic - possible 36
Netherlands - up to 70
Poland - 60
All of the above were actual prospective sales where dialogue was ongoing at the time. The list also included Austria Singapore Saudi Arabia and
Greece (subsquently lost 1 won 2 and with Greece in abeyance following an F-16 buy).
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 09:48 AM by matej
|
I can say that number 36 next to Czech republic is VEEEEEEEERY unrealistic. The word "possibe" is very good, because Czech republic had a big
problem to find money for 12 + 2 Gripens.  They also suspended MiGs-29 because they have two engines and burn a lot of fuel. To buy and use
Eurofighters is unreal.
Also Poland bought 40 F-16s, so there is no gap to sell Eurofighters.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 10:01 AM by waynos
|
Thanks Matej (and also for the article which I now have :up  .
I know about the Polish order for the F-16 (and also South Korea I think) but I am curious as to when these orders were placed, if after Jan 2004 then
they would almost certainly kill off Eurofighters hopes there, but if after there might still be some scope for a later sale (as with Greece).
It might also be true that the cheaper Gripen was selected by the Czech Republic instead of Typhoon, this makes sense. I know they are getting Gripens
- I have seen a photo of a Czech Gripen on test flight, I was just wondering about it in relation to this table.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 10:14 AM by matej
|
It is exactly what I am saying. I cant qualified describe the other states, but I have a lot of friends and some family in Czech republic, so I 100 %
know that they are not going to buy any new fighters during next (at least) 10 years. But the hope of manufacturers is still a funny reading....
PS: South Korea bought F-15K.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 10:25 AM by waynos
|
Doh, or course they did, silly waynos
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 11:32 AM by Harlequin
|
external image
12 JAS-39C and 2 JAS-39D aircraft have been ordered for delivery starting 2005. There will be some adaption to Czech airforce requirements - they will
also have the option to buy them (they are only leasing them) at teh end of the contract.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 12:25 PM by waynos
|
Don't you just hate those all-grey low viz roundels that so many air forces use these days? No style. Thankfully the latest pictures of USN
F/A-18E's show the full three colour original reinstated
I'm glad the RAF never followed this route but it has to be said that the 'pink and powder blue' version is less than macho.
[edit on 23-12-2005 by waynos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |