It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a little-remembered debate from 1994, the Clinton administration argued that the president has "inherent authority" to order physical searches — including break-ins at the homes of U.S. citizens — for foreign intelligence purposes without any warrant or permission from any outside body. Even after the administration ultimately agreed with Congress's decision to place the authority to pre-approve such searches in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, President Clinton still maintained that he had sufficient authority to order such searches on his own.
"The Department of Justice believes, and the case law supports, that the president has inherent authority to conduct warrantless physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes," Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on July 14, 1994, "and that the President may, as has been done, delegate this authority to the Attorney General."
Makes you wonder....
So your argument is that because we had two former dirty presidents we shouldn't give a hoot if the current president may be doing dirty things?
Originally posted by Valhall
So your argument is that because we had two former dirty presidents we shouldn't give a hoot if the current president may be doing dirty things?
Is that your argument?
Originally posted by Seekerof
Are you saying that there was, curme?
seekerof
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Don't try change the subject, whether some other president did it does not make it right. Bush broke the law and says he will continue to break the law, that is the issue. You definitely work for the administration, i have seen this attempt somewhere else, pathetic.
Bush was caught in a lie! How can you trust him? Last year he said that searches still needed court ordered warrants but now we know those statements were lies.
Question for people on the Bush bandwagon about illegaly spying on Americans.
Bush gets slagged because he's a bad President and doesn't do good things for the nation.
Originally posted by UFObeliever
Carter did not do the samething but Clinton did.
Bush should be impeached for violating the 4th amendment and abusing his executive powers. Bush was caught in a lie! How can you trust him?
Last year he said that searches still needed court ordered warrants but now we know those statements were lies.
Supporting the Patriot Act, spying of Americans with out warrant, and what ever other violations of law will come out durring this administration is a more liberal move then a conservative one. Party affiliation really does blind people.
Originally posted by curme
I remember the hoopla when the Clinton adminstration went after that CIA agent Aldrich Ames, the illegal searches. It was a big story, but I'm a little older trhan most, and some have longer memories than others.
Originally posted by marg6043
The fact still remind the same, he abuse his power when he had not need to do it and a patriot act to back him off.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Bush was caught in a lie! How can you trust him? Last year he said that searches still needed court ordered warrants but now we know those statements were lies.
It might interest you to know that the current debate and thread is not about illegal searches, but about phone calls conversations. I do hope you can get your facts straight.
Question for people on the Bush bandwagon about illegaly spying on Americans.
And It is a moot point, but I’ll try on more time, can you please show me where President Bush broke the law? You can say it as much as you want, but words are cheap you know?
The fact still remind the same, he abuse his power when he had not need to do it and a patriot act to back him off.