proof: CIA responsible for global terrorism: michael meiring

hello ats.

while we are being expertly deflected by one juicy story -- the president spying on us citizens -- another struggles to remain secret -- the cia is behind global terrorism.

cia agent michael meiring blew his own legs off during a covert attempt at planting a "terrorist" bomb.
there is a coordinated coverup (spike) by factions of the cia controlled media to prevent reporting of this information.
the mission that went bad was a "terrorist attack" mission in the philippeans where meiring mishandled the device while traveling to the target.

www.voxfux.com...

i really had a hard time when i started reading books about this topic 3 years ago getting my mind around it.. it seems so large and almost like a movie.. but now i completely get it.. and i get why its done and who gains and who controls money movements. my biggest issue now is there is so much disinformation out there and some people are down right crazy its very hard to filter threw it all and find what is real and not.. but i have tons of time so i have learned to follow the money, who gains, and what else was happening at the time of the event. this tends to help get me threw what is real and not

brian

Read all of the source's articles and links to it.

www.voxfux.com... Read them all.

deltaboy: i just bookmarked the site ...after i sleep ..i tend to be up all night and sleep all afternoon hehe ..i will go and read it all.. are u pro or con for that site ?

brian

Pretty much con for the site. So much hatred and so very bias.

ok i will still skim it then .. i have been on here a little while before i signed up and read your posts on other topics and know your name as someone who seems to know what they are talking about.. one example of a post i followed before hand was that guy with the whole cnn headquarters on the 110 floor of the wtc and no deaths ect ...not sure if u remember that it was back in 2004 hehe but i been following some people on here to see who knows what.. do u have a link to add that u are pro for that you feel would be better info that i could also look at?

brian

The sources of stories is something I always pay close attention to when read anything on here. Something everyone should do when reading or posting info is check your sources to make sure it is something as a community we can all agree is a reliable one. If you want to deny ignorance, use reliable sources.

There is a deep end... and long ago, Vox gleefully jumped into the center of it.

While some of his work has interesting echoes of familiarity (his Nick Berg analysis reads like a rehash of our famous thread) and possibly even truth, his well-beyond-the-top presentation severely hurts any hope of achieving credibility.

Here's a prime example of a conspiracy theorist with maybe the right intentions, but his unfortunately intense style prevents any possibility that the message may travel outside conspiracy circles.


(Wonders why they're always like this.)

Oh yeah, this is a reputable site for unbiased information (not!!). I may be misremembering, but wasn't this the same site that predicted somesort of chem-bio-dirtybomb attack during the last presidential go-'round? If not please someone correct me. Vox seems to be less concerned with accuracy in their stories, and more with spewing their unrelenting hatred and anger at Pres. Bush, and his administration.
I don't know a whole lot about the people who run the Vox site, but paranoia seems to be rampant. I mean seriously, not every break in is a black bag job. Sometimes a burglary is just that.
Just an aside, if the cia is so all powerful, running the media giants, etc...
could they not hire someone a bit more ummm... well competant to handle the bomb making operations?