The Inherent Need to Believe
As plausible as the concept and curiosity of the Trojan Horse maybe be to many of us, in truth, Homer did what Hollywood today does: Homer took a long
and complicated historical oral tradition of a conflict, condensed it, and made it simpler to understand, while
spicing it up, so to speak,
with romance and grand rivalries.
There is
no archaeological evidence(s) that specifically or directly supports and/or reinforces Homer’s
Hollywood version of a
ten-year long [interestingly, also according to Greek oral tradition, ten-years was how long the romantic and mythical war between the Zeus and his
allies and the Titans was believed to have lasted], Bronze Age conflict pitting the herculean Mycennaean Greeks against the vaunted and mighty
Trojans, ending in the Trojan Horse being the romantic and deadly tool that led to the fiery and castastrophic destruction of Troy. Additionally,
along with the Trojan Horse mention, there are way too many inconsistencies to Homer's epic battle involving Troy.
The story of the Trojan Horse is simply a
hollow, forgive the pun, romantic and tragic myth, having no verifiable basis in and of
archaeological or historical validity or
truth. It does, however, make for grand and exciting movies.
seekerof