It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Briggs
You can spin it anyway you want . I dont think he cares as long as you get what he is trying to say.
Originally posted by SKMDC1
Originally posted by sleeper
Not sure what your question is but if you are asking where is it written that Jesus murder Jews and Romans----it's written in the many books of Josephus. There are too many chapters on it but I will quote a sentence or two, "When Valerian came near the city, he and his troops dismounted, but before any talks, the rebel leaders, led by a certain Jesus, charged out at them."
Link please?
Originally posted by sleeper There are many more passages filled with blood and gore and for the sake of the women and children I will not quote them here---read up on Josephus and see for yourself.
Link please?
Originally posted by sleeper Josephus did not believe or know about the Jesus of Nazareth, however three hundred years later some one inserted Jesus of Nazareth into Josephus's writings----only the most ardent of Christian historians believe that passage to be authentic.
I think you're behind the news on Josephus. First of all the passages are included in a copy of the Antiquities dated at 200 years after Josephus, so your at least 100 years off there. And then there's this:
Originally posted by Wikipedia
Modern consensus
Over the last century, the consensus seems to have changed, and the subjective nature of many of the arguments used in the 19th century has been recognised. Judging from the 2003 survey of the historiography, it seems that the majority of modern scholars consider that Josephus really did write something here about Jesus, but that the text that has reached us is corrupt to a perhaps quite substantial extent. There has been no consensus on which portions are corrupt, or to what degree. However a significant number of scholars consider it genuine, on the grounds that all of the passages supposed to be corrupt are upheld by other writers; a significant number of scholars likewise consider the passage interpolated, on the ground that all the passages upheld are likewise demolished by other writers.
I would provide a link to this, but it is in fact from the same Wikipedia article I linked in my very first post. It seems that your contention that only the most ardent Christian historians think that passage is authentic is about 100 years out of date too. From what Wikipedia says it looks to be more like a 50/50 split at this point, and clearly still up for debate.
Originally posted by MagicPriest420
Originally posted by Briggs
You can spin it anyway you want . I dont think he cares as long as you get what he is trying to say.
I agree with you on this...what he said was important to all humanity,but it does depend on how you interpret it.....the reason why i focused directly on christains is because they only believe inn one god...i im not to sure about the hindus and such....i thot they believed in more then one god...i have no probems with them...there religons was around before christanity spread.. personally i think they have a better meaning of god then the christains do...christains want everyone to have a guilt trip,because of jesus...oh he died for you..so this is the truth...blah blah...unless i can have picture perfect evidence i wont ever believe that is true
one other thing i noticed mr briggs ...you dont comment on any other stuff i say...maybe because its sinking in your thick skull..and you cant refute what im saying...dont ask me what i said..why dont you just go back and read it
[edit on 21-12-2005 by MagicPriest420]
Originally posted by Briggs
No Magicpriest , I dont comment on the other things you say because
I have respect for your beliefs.
I wont put you down for what you believe in, so i try to make my comments
constructive in some way . albeit i dont always succeed .
I am fascinated by what other people have to say , and i try to keep in Mind
that in every Story no matter how crazy it may sound , there may be some
truth to it .
And i never said you wrong about anything , although i do think you maybe
a little sidetracked.
Originally posted by sleeper
I don't have links, you have to buy the books or find then at the library or inquire at your local seminary. I haven't looked to see if that info is on the net----I don't need to I have all Josephus' books.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus never converted, never believed, and therefore would not have written the small blurt found in his writings about Jesus.
Josephus never wrote about Jesus the Christ, no matter how much you or others what to believe that, its historical fact.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by sleeper
I don't have links, you have to buy the books or find then at the library or inquire at your local seminary. I haven't looked to see if that info is on the net----I don't need to I have all Josephus' books.
It must be nice to make claims without specific references. Gee, I wish I could post a whole bunch of stuff about the Bible without having to refer to particular passages when asked. It's a might bit unfair, is it not?
[edit on 21-12-2005 by saint4God]
Originally posted by sleeper
Jesus was a common name in Judea back two thousand years ago, and there are more than one person with that name who are in Josephus' books.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus was a soldier who fought the Romans, he later converted and became a Roman, in effect he was part of the machine that destroyed most of the Jewish nation.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by sleeper
Jesus was a common name in Judea back two thousand years ago, and there are more than one person with that name who are in Josephus' books.
Well, he referred to James as, "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ". That looks pretty specific to me who he was talking about, no confusion there.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus was a soldier who fought the Romans, he later converted and became a Roman, in effect he was part of the machine that destroyed most of the Jewish nation.
And? Are you saying Paul wasn't? The book of Acts, is a great place to start to see the parallels.
[edit on 21-12-2005 by saint4God]
Originally posted by sleeper
What I told you are quotes from the book, if you wish to verify what I quoted go get the books and verify.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus’ books are copy righted or I would post the pages.
Originally posted by sleeper
The internet has created a lazy attitude, if it's not on the net and easy to get to forget it-----does anyone read books anymore?
Originally posted by sleeper
And we wonder why so few know anything.
Originally posted by MagicPriest420
Its ok to have faith in jesus,...but he did not die for your sins..or for anyone
Originally posted by sleeper
I read the New Testament inside and out,
Originally posted by sleeper
and all most became a preacher---my problem I didn't know when to stop researching. Not only the whole bible but anything I could get my hands on about Christianity, Judaism and the Roman Empire.
Originally posted by sleeper
I even wrote two books about Christianity and the history of the Jews after the Romans. I will not post or give out the names of those books for obvious reasons.
Originally posted by saint4God
God cares about the heart. Being a preacher doesn't make anyone holy. Seeking the truth never turned anyone away from God, else He would not have said, "seek and you will find". What was it you were seeking?
I respect that you'd not use the forum as an ad agency . Or is it to protect your identity?
Originally posted by sleeper
I was going to preach to get the word out like you are doing, not for brownie points.
Originally posted by sleeper
I researched so that I could prove that the story of Jesus was true, instead my seeking brought me to other conclusions.
I go to church, and all my family are Christians, but I am no longer, still I pretend that I am for their sake.
Originally posted by sleeper
I have no intention to persuade anyone away from their beliefs----beliefs are good and help many people get through this life.
Originally posted by sleeper
I respect that you'd not use the forum as an ad agency . Or is it to protect your identity?
Both
originally posted by MagicPriest420
what ezekiel saw was ufos....end of discussion
Originally posted by sleeper
I don't have links, you have to buy the books or find then at the library or inquire at your local seminary. I haven't looked to see if that info is on the net----I don't need to I have all Josephus' books.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus was a Roman Jew had he believed that Jesus was the Messiah he would have converted to Christianity as did others who believed.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus never converted, never believed, and therefore would not have written the small blurt found in his writings about Jesus.
Originally posted by sleeper
Jesus was a common name in Judea back two thousand years ago, and there are more than one person with that name who are in Josephus' books.
Originally posted by sleeper
Josephus never wrote about Jesus the Christ, no matter how much you or others what to believe that, its historical fact.