The case for God's existance..., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 12:05 PM by e-nonymous
Originally posted by ThereIsATrUtH
Ok...first of all you start of with an incredibly weak arguement "You've never seen your god, never heard your god, and anything they can't explain is attributed to being a miracle performed by god"....first of all...have you ever seen your brain? have you ever heard your brain? touched it? smelled it? tasted it?....With your logic i must have to say that you have no brain....just because something doesnt appear directly to your senses doesnt mean that it doesnt exist...and you say that what we can't explain is attributed to a miracle performed by God?...that is ridiculous...There is scientific proof that God exists and I would be more then happy to prove to you that Christianity is true.

You also say that religion claims to have all the answers...I beleive you are sadly mistaken...Religion claims that "all the answers" are out there, and that God does in fact possess them all.

Anyways...feel free to instant message me (link224488) or send me a reply and i will show you that God does exist



Hey, don't mean to belittle you but... there is such a thing called a brain. Neurologist's study it everyday. Brain surgeon's operate on it everyday. AI developer's try to emulate it everday. I don't see how his argument was weak when you give the brain example. We KNOW there is a brain. However, there is no scientific proof of god. There is no direct physical proof of god. There is a book that was written by man that talks about god. There are many religion's all saying they're the true religion of god. That doesn't mean any single one IS the true religion, such as christianity. For all you could know, it's actually the wrong one. There's over a dozen, they all can't be right. Now, saying that because we don't know how the universe formed.. that would be a weak argument for proof of god. Saying that life is to complex for you to understand how it could have came about would also be a weak argument for proof of god. Saying that because we haven't found a missing link yet would also be yet again, another weak argument for proof of god. See where I'm going with this?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
The meaning or point of existence or life
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Sand Castles and Science
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags