This topic is in the Regional Politics discussion forum.  (rss)


Holocaust denier




Topic started on 17-12-2005 @ 01:29 PM by bodrul


i am just curious why people are called Holocaust deniers if they question the amount of jews killed by hitler
and in some countries a arrestible offence
isnt it someones right of freedom of speach and so on to be able to question things


on a side note i have done the holacaust in history and so forth



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 01:35 PM by kenshiro2012


that is easy.
by questioning the validity of "Historical facts" you must be deying everything. You know along the lines of George Washington having slept everywhere and of course his wooden teeth.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 01:39 PM by bodrul


not really
dening something happend and questioning some aspects of something is completely diffrent.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 01:51 PM by kenshiro2012


Not by theones who accuse people of denying the holocost.
by their definition to question any part is exactly the same as saying it did not happen. Look at the news in the past few weeks.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 02:05 PM by Seekerof


Question Mr. Bodrul:
Why are those holocaust deniers and unlegit historical revisionist solely looking to reduce the Holocaust numbers of murdered Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, Russians, etc, etc, etc? Have you actually ever wondered why they solely concentrate on Jews and the Holocaust [a genocide], all the while not concentrating on no other historical genocide? Have you researched most of these holocaust deniers to see how they are connected to neo-nazism, white supremacy organizations or groups or having such other like type antisemitic affiliations, etc? Why do they say and assert that the Holocaust did not happen or the gas chambers never existed, etc, etc when they are debunked by ongoing and well-established academic and ligitimate historical invesitigation and research?

Their agenda, the Holocaust denial agenda, is not an honest pursuit of number corrections or anything dealing with ligetimate accuracy on anything connected to the Holocaust itself, hell Bodrul, we have legit academic historians doing Holocaust number corrections all the time, based upon past and ongoing legitimate academic research. Their agenda is obvious and deplorable, and defending them is even more unthinkable and detestable.





seekerof

[edit on 17-12-2005 by Seekerof]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 03:26 PM by bodrul


in no way did i say its right for people to deny that it happend
nor have i defended any

my intentions are just based on to know why people cant question it not Deny it

ps i know almost all of the deniers are some kkk freaks

but as i said before to deny something and question is completly diffrent



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.091 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread