Song sites face legal crackdown

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Dec, 17 2005 @ 05:41 AM
link   

Song sites face legal crackdown
By Ian Youngs
BBC News entertainment reporter



Unauthorised guitar tabs and other musical scores are widely available
The music industry is to extend its copyright war by taking legal action against websites offering unlicensed song scores and lyrics.
The Music Publishers' Association (MPA), which represents US sheet music companies, will launch its first campaign against such sites in 2006.

MPA president Lauren Keiser said he wanted site owners to be jailed.

He said unlicensed guitar tabs and song scores were widely available on the internet but were "completely illegal".

Mr Keiser said he did not just want to shut websites and impose fines, saying if authorities can "throw in some jail time I think we'll be a little more effective".

Bitter battles

The move comes after several years of bitter legal battles against unauthorised services allowing users to download recordings for free.

Publishing companies have taken action against websites in the past, but this will be the first co-ordinated legal campaign by the MPA.

The MPA would target "very big sites that people would think are legitimate and very, very popular", Mr Keiser said.

"The Xerox machine was the big usurper of our potential income," he said. "But now the internet is taking more of a bite out of sheet music and printed music sales so we're taking a more proactive stance."

Music publishers and songwriters will consider all tools under the law to stop this illegal behaviour

David Israelite
National Music Publishers' Association
David Israelite, president of the National Music Publishers' Association, added his concerns.

"Unauthorised use of lyrics and tablature deprives the songwriter of the ability to make a living, and is no different than stealing," he said.

"Music publishers and songwriters will consider all tools under the law to stop this illegal behaviour."

Sandro del Greco, who runs Tabhall.co.uk, said the issue was not serious enough to warrant jail time and sites like his were not necessarily depriving publishers of income.

Learn

"I play the drums mainly but I play the guitar as well. I run the website and I still buy the [tab] books," he said.

"The tabs online aren't deadly accurate so if someone really wants to know it they'll buy the book.

"But most of the bands I listen to don't have tab books to buy so if you get them online, that's the only way you can really learn it unless you work it out yourself."

The campaign comes after lyric-finding software PearLyrics was forced off the internet by a leading music publishing company, Warner Chappell.

'No alternative'

PearLyrics worked with Apple's iTunes, searching the internet to find lyrics for songs in a user's collection.

"I just don't see why PearLyrics should infringe the copyright of Warner Chappell because all I'm doing is searching publicly-available websites," PearLyrics developer Walter Ritter said.

"It would be different if they had an alternative service that also provided lyrics online and also integrated [with iTunes] like PearLyrics did. But they don't offer anything like that at all."

A Warner Chappell statement said the company wanted to ensure songwriters were "fairly compensated for their works and that legitimate sites with accurate lyrics are not undermined by unlicensed sites".

"We have requested that PearWorks provide us with information regarding the sources of their lyrics, and have further asked that they discontinue the service if these sources are operating without a licence


See full article here news.bbc.co.uk...




posted on Dec, 17 2005 @ 03:03 PM
link   
Didn't they do this already, people will always find a way around it like drugs, etc., which begs the question why? Why Backstreet Boys and other record companies go after these people? It rarely works out well for either.


Plus, it's a crazy legal circus for everyone.



posted on Dec, 17 2005 @ 04:24 PM
link   
I'm quite ambivalent about this whole fight.

I don't pirate anything that I would otherwise have to pay original retail for, simply because I appreciate books and movies and music and games, and I want to see those who work to create them be rewarded for their work. However, I have no qualms about pirating things that are long since gone from the retail market.

For instance, I wouldn't pirate a new game, but I have no problem with downloading an original Nintendo ROM. If I were able to find the cartridge version of one of those games, it would either be on eBay or at a pawn shop, and the game designer wouldn't get any of that money anyway, so they're not out anything. So the whole issue doesn't affect me that much anyway.

The problem that I have with this sort of legal action though is that, despite claims to the contrary, it's not taken on behalf of the author of the thing in question, but on behalf of the publishers and producers and representatives and other assorted parasites that are sucking a living out of somebody else's work, and I honestly don't care in the least if they don't get the money that they're arguably not entitled to in the first place.

As I saw posted elsewhere, paraphrased by my faulty memory-- when a movie is pirated, all that means is that some producers kid can only buy a BMW instead of a Porsche. I really find it hard to care.

Piracy that hurts the creator of something is wrong. Piracy that hurts the parasites who make a living off of somebody else's creation sort of makes me smile.



[edit on 17-12-2005 by Bob LaoTse]





new topics
 
0

log in

join