It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I cant wait for those to say this is unreliable info and its not true.
Originally posted by ImJaded
That search in itself is damning enough info, even if not true but go ahead and claim all these sources unreliable ... it's enough to raise the questions at least.
Every time we publish a major story that puts some elected official in a bad light we get a chorus of boos from detractors who claim everything we publish is garbage and/or just a figment of an overactive imagination.
From 1994 until 2001, when Bill Clinton led the follies at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the cackle of disapproval came from hardcore Democrats who couldn't believe we would dare question the actions of their beloved President.
Since 2001, the rabid right-wing packed the cheap seats and showered us with catcalls because we uncovered the many misdeeds of George W. Bush and the questionable Republican leadership of Congress.
Oh, we still get raspberries from the lefties. They remember what we wrote about Clinton and we still go after Democrats who screw up. To partisans, anyone who doesn't write from a politically-biased point of view is automatically suspect.
Our latest story on President Bush's disrespectful comments on the Constitution ("it's just a goddamned piece of paper") brought the usual flurry of emails from readers who wanted to let us know that (insert name of web site here) is (pick one) "questioning your integrity/calling you a clown/saying your web site is a joke/etc."
Often, when we check into who's calling us what we find the questions come from an anonymous poster on a bulletin board or a partisan blogger who publishes under a nom de plume. They question both our use of anonymous sources and the credibility of those sources.
There is a laughable irony that comes from some keyboard commando who hides behind an anonymous "handle" criticizing us for publishing a story that uses anonymous sources.
The first journalism award I won, a Feature Writing First Place from The Virginia Press Association in 1967, came from a story about an anonymous teenager in Roanoke who obtained an abortion that was illegal at the time. I've won more than 30 journalism awards over the last 38 years and about half of them for stories that depended heavily on anonymous sources.
In a political system where retaliation rules, you can't expose corruption or misdeeds by depending entirely on those willing to allow use of their names. Without anonymous sources, the truth about Watergate would never have emerged. The Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting most often goes to a newspaper story or series of stories that depends heavily on use of anonymous sources.
It’s About A Lot More Than A "Goddamned Piece of Paper"
Bush Remark Reiterates Arrogant Globalist/Neocon "Crazies" Insane Lust For New World Order Prevalence And Power.
But after all, what's the big deal about Bush trashing the Constitution? Fox News didn't report it, that means it didn't happen, doesn't it?
Besides, I thought that if you defend the Constitution, you were now considered a terrorist? That's what this FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force brochure says anyway. Defenders of the US Constitution and the common law from which it grew are being classified on the same level as Nazis and the KKK.
Therefore George Bush was right to say “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”, otherwise he's a terrorist.
Originally posted by ludaChris
Yeah, most of those websites that came up on your littles search are either socialist, leftist or just opinion blog sites, that doesnt substantiate anything. Further more, none of them are from a legitamate news source, besides, why would it be public, its called HIPPA, the patient privacy act. When someone is prescribed drugs for anything it stays between the physician, pharmacist, and the patient. Swing and a miss, strike 2.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I think the fact that the first result that came up was from the same person spreading this is the most damning thing of all -- damning of this story as pure fantasy.
Originally posted by marg6043
Yeah, that sounds like Bush alright
Still think you have the best avatars, though
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Umm... Marge why don't you tell us of the first hand accounts you have had of his tantrums? Oh wait I forgot, its just your opinion which like most times is backed up by nothing.