posted on Dec, 14 2005 @ 11:41 PM
Originally posted by ludaChris
I just dont see why everythings a damned conspiracy. I say 9/11, someone says CIA conspiracy, I say Almenjaeda, someone says Illuminati agent. I
still stand by Occams Razor, being the simplist solution is the correct one.
Occams Razor is a false logic when events are so detailed that they span over decades and have a future of more decades ahead.
How can the simplest solution be the correct one each time? The world is not a simple place of yes/no, left/right, right/wrong, black/white,
intelligence organisations spend billions making sure of that so they have a cover to move behind.
At what point does this logic begin then? At what point can one safetly say 'this is the begining of the event' to be able to have a base for Occams
Razor to be applied?
For example on 9/11, people who use Occams Razor to 'prove' it was terrorists and not a NWO, are not starting that logic at the begining of events,
they are only applying that logic to the day. Therefor, Occams Razor fails because the simplest path doesn't begin in the middle of the event and
without all the knowledge of the history leading up to it and taking into account the propaganda and disinformation that spreads like wildfire, you
can't even begin to apply Occams Razor.
I'm not saying this example is proof of CIA etc etc but it could be if things progress in a way which support a NWO like most events so far have and
if so, then again, Occams Razor logic needs to be applied to this situation in a completely different context.
The only way for Iran to be taken out is for them to look like the worst thing on the planet. This is what happened with Iraq and this is what's
carefully being planned now for Iran which is why this guy is raising flags with the conspiracy crowd.