Content Tagging is Here!, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 14-12-2005 @ 06:54 PM by masqua
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Here's an interesting side-effect of the tagging:
www.abovetopsecret.com...


that's a great feature...I just looked up a few I tagged identically and they were lined up like ducks in a row.

Wonderful stuff!!!

So many tags already...what a busy bunch we are.



reply posted on 15-12-2005 @ 12:32 AM by Majic
What Would Jesus Type?

I know there are some questions about what “rules” members should use for tags and concerns about consistency and accuracy, etc.

I don't presume to speak for SO on this, but here's my take based on my work with various kinds of database systems:

Don't worry about it.

It'll be fine. Search systems like this actually work better if members “widen the field” by being creative with their tags.

If members are too rigid in categorizing threads, the benefits of member tagging are actually diminished.

As an example, say you use the same keyword to describe all threads on Iraq: the word “Iraq”. There are thousands of threads on Iraq, so if you search for the keyword “Iraq”, you'll get thousands of hits.

Helpful, but not very.

Celebrate Obversity

But if you get more specific -- and creative -- and offer more specific terms, like “Battle of Fallujah”, “Iraq Constitution”, “Zarqawi” or “Butcher of Baghdad”, then someone searching for that data will definitely appreciate the more specific tag.

On a grand scale, the general idea is that members will type in the kinds of words/phrases to tag a thread that they might use to search for the same thread later. Or so the theory goes.

Thus a good way to think when you're tagging a thread is “what would I type to find this thread?”

Or not. Your call.

It's all good, baby.





Edit: As for case sensitivity, I would be extremely surprised if that were an issue. For some funky reason, I've been capitalizing my keywords (maybe I subconsciously think of them as subtitles), but that's an unnecessary affectation.

Case-sensitivity is generally anathema to search systems, so I don't see the need to worry about it, and I'll probably just use lowercase going forward.

Put another way: if it mattered, I'm sure the Overlord would have mentioned it.

[edit on 12/15/2005 by Majic]


reply posted on 15-12-2005 @ 01:41 AM by wecomeinpeace
I noticed that whatever tag you enter, the WHOLE thing becomes the search term. It seems seperating them with commas does not designate them as separate tags.

E.g. A member has entered the tag "prediction, earthquake, tokyo" for
this thread. When you look in the tag list, you see that all three words plus the commas become one tag, one search term, one link:



Clicking that link will only bring up that thread. It will not bring up threads tagged with the single words "prediction", "earthquake", and "tokyo".

I'm not sure if this will affect the search function later, and whether or not a search for simply "earthquake" would pick up on this particular tag. If not, then such tags are pretty much wasted because it's unlikely anyone will search for those exact three terms in that exact order, with commas to-boot.

[edit on 2005-12-15 by wecomeinpeace]



reply posted on 15-12-2005 @ 09:28 AM by Hellmutt
A little bug perhaps.

It only register the first word. I just assigned three tags to a thread (separated by comma) :
Heroic Actions On The Battlefield

All three words I used appear tagged in the thread:

"This thread is currently defined by these tags:
war heroes, war stories, war,
"

I choose "war" because there were already someone who used the tag "war" for another thread and because it was a short word since the total can´t be more than 30 characters...

So far, so good...

However, the thread was only assigned to "war heroes" and not "war stories" or "war" :
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^