 |
reply posted on 10-1-2006 @ 09:15 PM by Esoteric Teacher
|
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
why can't we just attribute this to humans until actual evidence to the contrary springs up?
does anyone have any actual evidence to support the influence of an outside source on the construction of the pyramids? 
Hmm.
I don't recall being taught trigonometry in kindergarden.
They had us learning how to count.
I don't recall having learned anatomy and physiology in kindergarden.
They had us learning right from left.
So, why is it the earliest civilizations knew such mathamatical percision at the dawn of civilization?
So, why is it the earliest civilizations knew such doctoring skills, and the art of mumification?
How did they master these skills in so little time, with so little proof of any trial and error?
Why is there extremely conflicting evidence concerning the dates of construction? Sometimes puching the dates back to 10,500 b.c.?
Could we build this today, with what we accredit them to having?
If so, i'll need to see the end product, as proof.
I think these are some of the arguements that i've heard.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 12:22 AM by BlackGuardXIII
|
all true, still, people are the best bet for builders
It is perfectly logical that you can't have the best technology first, and then get worse as time passes, which is like what the pyramids seem to
indicate. The great pyramid is one of the oldest, and is the best. Thats like one of the first cars ever built being a Ferrari BB512, alongside the
Model A... It just doesn't make sense.
But, no aliens are required to explain the pyramid. The theory that this present civilization is the first, one and only advanced one ever to walk
the earth, is in my view, vanity. Geneticists have estimated that for about 200 000 years, people just like you and me have been around. What did we
do for the first 190 000 years?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 12:29 AM by Esoteric Teacher
|
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
What did we do for the first 190 000 years? 
Worship the Gods from the heavens, on every continent?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 12:44 AM by BlackGuardXIII
|
We sure did.
You have voted Esoteric Teacher for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
But, it is possible that those powerful beings from the skies were just people too. The Vedas describe vimanas, ancient flying vehicles, which only
the royalty could afford. If these royals were buzzing all over the planet, an ancient version of cargo cults could have sprung up.
I am not saying there aren't aliens, probably there are, considering the government doesn't usually cover up stuff that isn't there....
But I guess the pyramids builders, if it wasn't Khufu, (I feel it wasn't), may never be known. Unless of course the Illuminati know....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 12:47 AM by djohnsto77
|
There were inferior pyramids built before the Great Pyramid, such as the Step Pyramid and the Bent Pyramid.
That clearly shows an evolution of technique. Pyramids built after the Great Pyramid are just as advanced (arguably more so in some aspects)
architecturally albeit not as big, which probably indicates more a change in the ability of the builders to organize as big of a labor force, not a
loss of knowledge or skill.
You can see the timeline here:
www.nationalgeographic.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 03:25 AM by BlackGuardXIII
|
more advanced than the great pyramid? I'd like to see that.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Pyramids built after the Great Pyramid are just as advanced (arguably more so in some aspects) architecturally albeit not as big, 
I will agree to disagree. I might be mistaken, but I have not seen any pyramid before or after the great pyramid that even comes close to it in any
way. I did say it was built near the beginning, not that it was first, although I personally believe it was built much earlier than is accepted
generally. I stand by my point, that the great pyramid is an anomaly even accepting the official timeline. It is my feeling that there is no
building as advanced or more so than the great pyramid, before or after, in some respects, that is true to this day.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 10:25 AM by merka
|
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
I will agree to disagree. I might be mistaken, but I have not seen any pyramid before or after the great pyramid that even comes close to it in any
way. I did say it was built near the beginning, not that it was first, although I personally believe it was built much earlier than is accepted
generally. I stand by my point, that the great pyramid is an anomaly even accepting the official timeline. It is my feeling that there is no
building as advanced or more so than the great pyramid, before or after, in some respects, that is true to this day. 
Can you define "advanced"?
Sure its a pretty construction. The people that built it where obviously very skilled. But its still a pile of stones. There isnt much "advanced"
too it. The middle american pyramids easily rival the egyptian pyramids both in size and complexity. They arent really that advanced either, not even
with the fact they have the largest pyramid in the world.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 10:42 AM by DaFunk13
|
Yeah, I gotta agree. Sears Tower is advanced. These are still just piles of rocks. The skill employed to construct them is some feat, no doubt, but
still very possible.
Whoever created the pyramids just had a lot of time and creativity on their hands.
Or maybe bigfoot built it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 10:49 AM by BlackGuardXIII
|
advanced as in we haven't figured it out yet
I don't know how much study you have done on the details incorporated into the Giza pyramid, but there are some which the best minds of our time have
not been able to explain how they did it, nor how to duplicate it.
That is of course disputed, but I have yet to see the explanations.
So, to me, it is advanced. Granted the pyramid of the sun and moon have some very intriguing and unexplained aspects too, but from what I have read,
not nearly as many as the Giza pyramid. Specifically, one example is the drill bit score marks inside the sarcophagus in the kings chamber. Still
unexplained as far as I know, and I believe, not yet able to be duplicated.
This in no way implies alien assistance, as I feel that is not the most probable source of a solution, very smart humans is far more likely.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 11:26 AM by BostonBill99
|
According to Mark Lehner, one of the archeologists at the Giza site, the core of the pyramid (not the limestone casing) are NOT perfectly assembled,
with as much as 5-6 inch gaps between stones.
Mark's Interview on PBS
Yes, some of the stones have no gaps, but a lot of them do. We have to eliminate the myth that the ENTIRE pyramid is perfectly assembled. It's NOT.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 11:39 AM by CDXWED
|
ME ME ME; THERE IS NO I IN GOD
GOD IS SOVEREIGN; 100% HE EXISTS OUTSIDE OF OUR NORMAL SPACE AND TIME AND IS INFINITE IN ENERGY AND POSSIBILITY. JUST BECAUSE SOME CANNOT ACCEPT THIS
OR EVEN CHOOSE TO RUN/ HIDE FROM IT DOES NOT MAKE IT WRONG. GOD NEEDS NO ONE OR ANYTHING (ALTHOUGH HE LOVES US AND ASKS US TO GLORIFY HIM) AND
EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS WAS CONSTRUCTED FOR HIS GLORY. UNTIL A MAN OR WOMAN LETS GO OF 100% OF HIMSLEF/ HERSELF AND REALIZES THAT THE CHEF END OF MAN
IS TO GLORIFY GOD HE/SHE WILL REMAIN LOST. AFTER SOME LEAVE THIS UNIVERSE OF MATERIAL AND ENTER INTO HEAVEN (WHATEVER FORM IT MAY HAVE) WE WILL FIND
THAT IT WAS NOT CONSTRUCTED FOR US. IT EXISTS FOR US TO SHARE IN HIS GLORY FOREVER.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 12:25 PM by DaFunk13
|
A valid opinion that could be posted without SHOUTING.
Good point non the less.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 12:35 PM by merka
|
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
I don't know how much study you have done on the details incorporated into the Giza pyramid, but there are some which the best minds of our time have
not been able to explain how they did it, nor how to duplicate it.
That is of course disputed, but I have yet to see the explanations.
So, to me, it is advanced. Granted the pyramid of the sun and moon have some very intriguing and unexplained aspects too, but from what I have read,
not nearly as many as the Giza pyramid. Specifically, one example is the drill bit score marks inside the sarcophagus in the kings chamber. Still
unexplained as far as I know, and I believe, not yet able to be duplicated.
This in no way implies alien assistance, as I feel that is not the most probable source of a solution, very smart humans is far more likely.

We havent duplicated it today because we havent really tried. We've been busy building common things like cities and factories instead of massive
tombs.
And there are a TON of suggested ideas on how they did it (many pretty logical). We cant know exactly what they did unless we find evidence of it
(which in some aspects we have)... Hell, maybe they used many different ideas to complete it!
Just the other week I saw an idea about that used a rope system across the pyramid for pulling the heavy stones right up the side of the pyramid, a
weight on one side and the stone in the other. You empty the weight (which can be sand), put in another stone and repeat. An ancient elevetor using
the pyramid itself as leverage. A pretty easy system, although one that gets harder the higher you get.
Want to know where I read about it? A Donald Duck magazine!
[edit on 11-1-2006 by merka]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 01:08 PM by BlackGuardXIII
|
I have read of 200 years of trying to figure it out
Maybe we could duplicate it, it is quite possible. But, there are still unsolved mysteries that we would need to resolve in order to exactly do what
they did. Not at all impossible to think we might, if we really needed to, solve them all. But I can't say we haven't really tried. Since
Napolean almost 200 years ago, numerous brilliant scientists, engineers, builders, researchers, mathematicians, physicists, etc. have had a go at
them. There are alot of books written by them about their attempts to find workable theories. Many features once unknown are now at least solved,
though we may have a different solution than the original builders did. But ours look workable.
But, some of the anomalies are still nagging them, their ancient secret still hidden. At least that is my finding. I have yet to see a complete list
of solutions for all the hurdles, that has not been disproved as implausible.
It is at least 2 centuries that we have had the access, and math skills to accurately appreciate it, you'd think we'd have put this one to bed by
now.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 01:16 PM by BlackGuardXIII
|
Mark Lehner may be the foremost expert on them.
Originally posted by BostonBill99
According to Mark Lehner, one of the archeologists at the Giza site, the core of the pyramid (not the limestone casing) are NOT perfectly assembled,
with as much as 5-6 inch gaps between stones.
Mark's Interview on PBS
Yes, some of the stones have no gaps, but a lot of them do. We have to eliminate the myth that the ENTIRE pyramid is perfectly assembled. It's
NOT.

I have known of Mark Lehner for many years, and I agree, the interior is very likely just as he says. That does not however solve any challenges, it
just clrears up a mistaken belief some people assumed. The Mark Lehner I first read years ago was a much different pyramid researcher. He has
changed, maybe in order to be accepted in the established Egyptology circles. He is now very accepted there, and is possibly the most informed living
pyramid researcher. His focus has changed from pointing out the mysteries, to playing them down instead.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 01:52 PM by madnessinmysoul
|
Originally posted by BostonBill99
According to Mark Lehner, one of the archeologists at the Giza site, the core of the pyramid (not the limestone casing) are NOT perfectly assembled,
with as much as 5-6 inch gaps between stones.
Mark's Interview on PBS
Yes, some of the stones have no gaps, but a lot of them do. We have to eliminate the myth that the ENTIRE pyramid is perfectly assembled. It's
NOT.

excellent point
also i'd like to bring up a somewhat recent excavation of a site on the giza plateau. they found what appears to be the buried bodies of people who
worked on the pyramids. they were found to have died from broken bones which appear to be the result of straining the back muscles. this supports the
idea of massive amounts of cheap labor.
i'm trying to find a link to the info, so be patient.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 04:46 PM by BlackGuardXIII
|
I know why humans couldn't have done it
Ever listen to Carl Sagan describe the start of the universe? Compare that to the ancient cultures versions of creation. Which one would you, now be
honest, find more entertaining. I find the dry scientific descriptions of creation hard to make interesting. Some voices are worse than others, too,
for making me drowsy. The Australian Aborigine creation tale, the bible one, the Native ones, they all have something the rational, logical version
lacks, sizzle.
The story that humans built the pyramids...its not a story. There is nothing worth reporting there, and that won't sell newspapers. Like they say,
'not doing anything out of the ordinary is not news.' Living a normal life, common sense explanations of ancient things, not committing crimes, or
having a horrible accident, those are death to the news agencies. So, you add some sizzle, spice it up a bit, dramatize it, change the names, add a
few exciting, albeit fictional, details, for effect. Now you have a story. That is worth printing. No one is going to buy, "Pyramids built by
people." because it is dull, and it is what you'd expect. It is death for the publishing industry. Chariots of the Gods, Eternal Damnation,
hellfire and brimstone, the thunderbeings, alien pyramid builders,..... those stories have sizzle.
Sure they may not portray the exact truth.... but that is not the point here.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 05:23 PM by merka
|
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
Ever listen to Carl Sagan describe the start of the universe? Compare that to the ancient cultures versions of creation. Which one would you, now be
honest, find more entertaining. I find the dry scientific descriptions of creation hard to make interesting. Some voices are worse than others, too,
for making me drowsy. The Australian Aborigine creation tale, the bible one, the Native ones, they all have something the rational, logical version
lacks, sizzle.
The story that humans built the pyramids...its not a story. There is nothing worth reporting there, and that won't sell newspapers. Like they say,
'not doing anything out of the ordinary is not news.' Living a normal life, common sense explanations of ancient things, not committing crimes, or
having a horrible accident, those are death to the news agencies. So, you add some sizzle, spice it up a bit, dramatize it, change the names, add a
few exciting, albeit fictional, details, for effect. Now you have a story. That is worth printing. No one is going to buy, "Pyramids built by
people." because it is dull, and it is what you'd expect. It is death for the publishing industry. Chariots of the Gods, Eternal Damnation,
hellfire and brimstone, the thunderbeings, alien pyramid builders,..... those stories have sizzle.
Sure they may not portray the exact truth.... but that is not the point here. 
Ók then, I can stretch as far as aliens coming down to earth to give the humans advanced nano-loincloths so they could work without sweating to
much.
Sizzling enough for you?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 05:41 PM by BlackGuardXIII
|
Welcome to the news biz, no sizzle, no sale.
Ók then, I can stretch as far as aliens coming down to earth to give the humans advanced nano-loincloths so they could work without sweating to much.
Sizzling enough for you?
merka
Well it is a good start, there is definitely more intrigue than straight science there. If the loincloths were artificially intelligent, could fly,
and glowed in the dark, it would be more exciting. And then if these loincloths revolted and took over the world, and they built the pyramids... now
that is getting pretty sizzling.
Remember the words of Henry Ford, "History is the lie agreed upon."
Sure, you have to be careless with the truth, and some credibility is sacrificed, but it does make for a memorable story.
In a more rational view, it is much easier to believe the story that is logical, and is the most probable possibility, but inevitably that solution is
just dull.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-1-2006 @ 08:07 PM by slayerfan
|
carpenter builds stonehenge by hand in back yard
this guy has a good idea on how thay were built.
watch the video at the bottom of the page.
titled Backyard Stonehenge
www.exn.ca.../17/2004#
and his web site.
www.theforgottentechnology.com...
Oh, and he also uses a variation of his technique to move a pole barn by himeself over 300 feet
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |

<< 1 2 3 4 5 >>
|
|
Top Topics Right Now:
Active Topics Right Now:
ATS MIX Podcasts:
Newest Topics:
|
ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:
pyramids, who built the pyramids at giza, could humans build a pyramid, giza pyramid, pyramidology, necropolis, orions belt, lost ancient technology,
| |
|