It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Army has exceeded recruiting goals in the first two months of this fiscal year, reversing a trend that had some Iraq critics saying the armed services branch was "broken."
The Pentagon yesterday said the Army signed up 5,856 recruits in November, 5 percent above its goal. It previously announced the Army also exceeded its target in October, the first month of the 2006 fiscal year.
The Army has that hit its recruiting mark for six straight months, a promising development for the Bush administration. President Bush's critics had cited the Army's failure to achieve its recruiting goals in fiscal 2005 as proof that the war in Iraq is breaking the force.
Rep. John P. Murtha, Pennsylvania Democrat and one of the party's chief Iraq war critics, has called the Army "broken" and urged the White House to withdraw all U.S. troops from the country.
But Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon, said the service is more confident of filling the ranks as the recruiting year unfolds.
"Part of the reason is it's like steering a boat," he said. "The changes we made in the last year take a while to take effect."
Army Secretary Noel Harvey and Gen. Richard Cody, the vice chief of staff, said Monday that the Army is using looser Defense Department rules that permits it to sign up more high school dropouts and people who score lower on mental-qualification tests, but they denied that this meant it was lowering standards.
Until Army recruiters began having trouble signing up enough recruits earlier this year, the Army had set minimum standards that were higher than those of the Defense Department.
The Army has had a recruiting shortfall of 6,000 to 8,000 soldiers during the past 12 months. It hasn't fallen so short of its annual goal since 1979, several years after the Vietnam War.
military.com
Uncle Sam wants you – even if you’re 42 years old
By Rick Maze
Times staff writer
The Defense Department quietly asked Congress on Monday to raise the maximum age for military recruits to 42 for all branches of the service.
Under current law, the maximum age to enlist in the active components is 35, while people up to age 39 may enlist in the reserves. By practice, the accepted age for recruits is 27 for the Air Force, 28 for the Marine Corps and 34 for the Navy and Army, although the Army Reserve and Navy Reserve sometimes take people up to age 39 in some specialties.
The Pentagon’s request to raise the maximum recruit age to 42 is part of what defense officials are calling a package of “urgent wartime support initiatives” sent to Congress Monday night prior to a Tuesday hearing of the House Armed Services military personnel subcommittee.[
Army Times
Originally posted by curme
I
Lower the standards, get more soldiers! Genius!
Originally posted by skippytjc
VIVA IRAQ!!! VICTORY IS YOURS!
Originally posted by namehere
souljah so? 43 days vs over 700 and you dont expect more deaths during the longer period?
Originally posted by Seekerof
The Coalition remaining troops will come home when the Iraqi government asks us to leave, not when you say.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Those Iraqi leaders mentioned in your articles are not the Iraqi government leaders.
Next?
Originally posted by Souljah
Ahhh YES I forgot!
The ONLY Iraqi Leaders are the Ones put in Power by the USA, right?
The Voice of the Iraqi people does not Count anyway!
Ahhh YES I forgot!
The ONLY Iraqi Leaders are the Ones put in Power by the USA, right?
The Voice of the Iraqi people does not Count anyway!
Originally posted by Souljah
The ONLY Iraqi Leaders are the Ones put in Power by the USA, right?
The Voice of the Iraqi people does not Count anyway!
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Nukunuku can you please elaborate on your post.
Originally posted by nukunuku
yes sure, your country is in the war which it doesnt want to win....im sorry let me rephrase....your country has been hijacked by multinational corporations which trough lobyists control your country and make a lot of money by making sure the war keeps on going forever....and they need people to fight their wars.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
the Iraqi Leaders are the ones put in power by
the Iraqi people...
Try reading the blogs from Iraq - the uncensored voice of
Iraqis. They are VERY happy to be free and to be able to
speak. They are also grateful for their freedoms and they
are grateful to America and the coalition for bringing it to them.